I know that anyone who has admitted to doing simulations has received their share of ridicule. But, what I think these bashers fail to realize is that when we all handicap, we are just doing the same thing that the simulation is doing. We use statistics and matchups just like the machine. We account for weather just like the machine. The one thing the machine does better than us is it can do it faster. If I understand things correctly, the newer games try to use accurate stats. I think that any tool you can use to get an edge should be used. If you handicap a game and then run a simulation and it comes up with the same result you did, then you should consider it a good bet. I do not think you should blindly bet a simulation result with out doing your own due diligence. Keep up the good work Mista!!
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
fficeffice" /><o
></o>
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
fficeffice" /><o></o>
