randolph said:I think one of the more popular wagers while scouring the forums today was the Boston Red Sox over the Atlanta Braves. Now with both Schilling and Smoltz throwing for their respective teams, unless Red Sox bettors were counting on Schilling going the distance, what could they have been thinking when they wagered their hard earned cash? Surely and I mean surely they weren't counting on the Boston pigpen. I mean it's no secret that the Boston pigpen is the absolute shit and sure enough, they produced as scheduled in coughing up a 3-2 Red Sox lead to allow the Braves to go ahead 5-3 in the 7th inning. As I said, what could the numerous Bosox bettors have been possibly thinking?
ucking: :howdy:
randolph said:I think one of the more popular wagers while scouring the forums today was the Boston Red Sox over the Atlanta Braves. Now with both Schilling and Smoltz throwing for their respective teams, unless Red Sox bettors were counting on Schilling going the distance, what could they have been thinking when they wagered their hard earned cash? Surely and I mean surely they weren't counting on the Boston pigpen. I mean it's no secret that the Boston pigpen is the absolute shit and sure enough, they produced as scheduled in coughing up a 3-2 Red Sox lead to allow the Braves to go ahead 5-3 in the 7th inning. As I said, what could the numerous Bosox bettors have been possibly thinking?
:realtongu
:money:
As bad as Boston's bullpen is the Braves bullpen is twice as bad that is what I bet most bettors took into consideration
Very good point nwsbball31 and I suppose their offense may have had something to do with it now that I see the score. (9-5 Boston)
mofume, next time I want some b.s. out of you like the moronic comment above, I'll squeeze you're fucking head!ucking:
Very good point nwsbball31 and I suppose their offense may have had something to do with it now that I see the score. (9-5 Boston)
mofume, next time I want some b.s. out of you like the moronic comment above, I'll squeeze you're fucking head!
ucking:randolph said:As bad as Boston's bullpen is the Braves bullpen is twice as bad that is what I bet most bettors took into consideration
Very good point nwsbball31 and I suppose their offense may have had something to do with it now that I see the score. (9-5 Boston)
mofume, next time I want some b.s. out of you like the moronic comment above, I'll squeeze you're fucking head!
you're a sharp baseball mind. a true gift to the forums.
you said, "As I said, what could the numerous Bosox bettors have been possibly thinking?
"you deserve to made fun of. you made a fool of yourself and i am pleased by it. i did not make you say something so stupid. dont blame others.
arty:
Listen chump I know a hell of a lot more about this game than you'll ever know, though I don't think I'll ever know as much as you've claimed to have lost loser. If I'm not mistaken mofume, you recently got your ass booted out of the EOG forum because of your constant trouble making at that site. I really enjoyed reading the General's thread when he tuned you up before sending you off to the dump where you belong. However it looks like the dump lost a bit of garbage. You might wanna head back where you belong because I don't think it'll be too long before you get the boot out of here either! :missingte
As for you there Francis, as the saying goes, when I want any of your usual bullshit input in my thread, I'll kindly squeeze that little head of your's after I summon you. :missingte
As for you there Francis, as the saying goes, when I want any of your usual bullshit input in my thread, I'll kindly squeeze that little head of your's after I summon you. :missingte
randolph, not only am i one of the most popular members there, but i can do what i like. you are very unaware of things, as most here seem to be. im flattered that you try to keep up with me though.
i crap out things that know more about this game than you do. your sophmoric comments here are a fine indicator of just how knowledgable you are about the game. you are a sqaure.
also, i am pleased to see that you call the Coat factory your home.
later, square
arty:
i crap out things that know more about this game than you do. your sophmoric comments here are a fine indicator of just how knowledgable you are about the game. you are a sqaure.
also, i am pleased to see that you call the Coat factory your home.
later, square
arty:
Well at least you got that right, but I didn't ask for an idiot to enter my thread. Unfortunately I got one who has stirred up shit, not uncommon for him to do so upon any forum he intrudes upon. Give it a rest and go back to the 'Dump' where you belong jackass! (You obviously need help my little man) :nohead:
mofome...
he frequently needs correcting... just a lil rookie who doesn't have the balls to put up any plays of his own, but jumps all over others' even when they are on fire...
kinda like a 9 year old on daddy's puter for the first time...
rook 4 sure and gutless too......
burlington huh? vermont? rofl... probably was a Dean supporter...
he frequently needs correcting... just a lil rookie who doesn't have the balls to put up any plays of his own, but jumps all over others' even when they are on fire...
kinda like a 9 year old on daddy's puter for the first time...
rook 4 sure and gutless too......
burlington huh? vermont? rofl... probably was a Dean supporter...
Francesco said:
i see. thanks for the heads up. In that case its simple enough to put him on block. Wins, laughs, good times....if you cannot contribute to one or all of those things, no point to reading your posts. i will learn about some over here soon enough. Its about the wins and if thise dufus doesnt produce, no need to read. its fairly obvious that hes not much more intelligent than a decent sized frog. Your information confirms this.
BOL Franc
:toast:
