well, they didn't want to leave the Patriots with any time on the clock either, since the Pats would only need a FG to tie it. So they certainly didn't want to score with 1 minute left
it was working out ideally from the Seahawk perspective. Enough time to use all three downs (if they passed once) and use up all the clock. win win
nobody expected a pass from a distance that wasn't intercepted all year in the entire league to be intercepted in that spot
Jesus with the Fluke play! If you want to go that route Pats were SUPER lucky that 4 out of 5 of Seattle's vaunted secondary were hurt! And the comeback began once Avril left the game with a concussion. No D-line depth Bennett had no help and ran out of gas! Again Morons running the Seahawks; Chancellor gets hurt on the Friday before the Super Bowl, idiots! Should just be doing walkthroughs and game film not anything to tire or hurt players 2 days before the Super Bowl!
However banged up they may have been, injuries are part of the game. You think having GRONK may have helped the Pats in 2011, 2012, 2013? Or having Brady not get hurt vs SD in '07? etc etc
Cmon that play was a fluke play. injuries happen all the time, receptions like that do not happen all the time.
24 for 102
that's good, that's far far far from great
and Lynch was already stuffed twice on third and short in that game. (had to look it up)
the argument he was running through the Pats is mythology
third and two early
third and one late
And I hear you but you can't say had they won it was a gift. They played a great game.
I mean, stats don't really lie. Maybe I'm wrong.
24 attempts, 102 yards and 1 TD. I'm not good at math but that's 4.25 YPC.
He also caught one pass for 31 yards.
they don't lie, and that's good, but it's not great
throw in being stuffed twice already in that very game, and the fact that Lynch scored once in five attempts from the one during the season, and the numbers clearly suggest it was not an automatic (which is even more mythology)
I wasn't saying if they won it would've been a gift, just that play was lucky. Their victory would've been more improbable because of that play than NEs victory because an INT was.
I was responding to Vitts assertion the Pats were given the game. You can't say that either.
i disagree
worst decision ever only because of the outcome
the only people that matter are the people who are willing to challenge conservative ideas to bring innovation to the table. you can never be great if you are afraid of failure.
I'm a Seahawks fan. Have been for ages. I can sit here and tell you Brady, Edelman and they all played great. I take nothing away from the Pats that day.
That's the difference between NE fans and all other fans.
I have to be honest with you, I have no idea what you're talking about now
just more trumped up mythology, especially since I didn't dis the Hawks at all
I've done nothing more than to try and explain why it's not black and white, why it's not the worst call in the history of sports, and now I'm doing such because I'm part of a bad fan base. I'm unreasonable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
my god, why
Willie "STFU", leave it be
thank you, great advice buddy
That's the difference between NE fans and all other fans.