Lmao. Alex Jones was just destroyed in court for his disgusting display about sandy hook. Trump was wrong about everything and lied so many times that all his people are in jail or testifying against him. He only has his low iQ cult with him….like you.
Money flows in. Money doesn’t get you the influence it once did. We just go to the next guy ready to write a check. There is a line. I’m the smartest guy here and by far the furthest up the ladder than any of you will have ever known…..you could not be more wrong on how things work. Your masters play you and get you riled up. They keep you stupid and angry for a reason. Haven’t you figured out yet why you’re still waiting for the “big news” to hit. It never will. They keep you on a string and laugh at you.
LIVE: Hearing on Motion to Unseal Search Warrant on #MarALago
Watch Now on @EpochTV theepochtimes.com/hearing-on-m
Watch Now on @EpochTV theepochtimes.com/hearing-on-m
Alex Jones was not "destroyed" by a corrupt Soros judge. (There we go with Soros again!)
The Soros judge tried to "fact check" him under oath trying and humiliate him, and instead he BLINDSIDED the DS exposing Bill Clinton on Pedo Island.
Alex was very sympathetic to the families, and some have since reached out and begun a dialogue involving their charities and such - even though the DS lawyers yelled at them in court pulling them away. It's all on video.
It's all a DS show and witch hunt designed to silence truth tellers, and you fall for their Fake News propaganda each and every single time! Holy hell, are you ever BRAINWASHED AND CONTROLLED!
"experts" = paid DNC/DS hacksOops!!
K N O C K O U T ! ! !
On the classification issue, both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama signed executive orders — which remain in force to this day — declaring that presidents have sweeping authority to declassify secrets and do not have to follow the mandatory declassification procedures all other government officials do.
The Jackson ruling and the declassification powers have left some experts worried the FBI raid was heavy-handed under the current laws.
Furthermore
For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.
"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.
"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.
For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.
"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.
"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.
