Teeth? This is it?
Ive watched a variety of Saddam speeches during the run up to the war today.
His bottom teeth are most certainly f-ed up.With his big ass mustache and no reason to smile his shiny uppers are not anywhere to be found.But then again thats not the point of contention...its the lowers.They are not so straight,in fact they look identical to those nasty baked beans during his capture...just a little bit whiter.
Id suggest you do the same.
Theyve matched the DNA,which of course could be faked or lied about, but then youve just added a host of folks to the conspiracy.
In any case,if I play devils advocate and we say that the teeth dont match,which they do,how do you know the pics you post showing Saddams nice teeth arent of his doubles mug? How old were those photos again?
So you suppose the Shia lynch mob,who took such joy in humilating him at the gallows would simply allow a double to be hung in his place? Or do you think those those guys were fooled as well.Not to mention the massive team of lawyers hired by his wife to defend him? Never once did I hear them state the man they hed been hired to represent wasnt him.
Was his defense team also in on it?
For every Iraqi you find that said 'thats not him' I reckon theres about 1000 that say 'thats him, good riddence'.
Ive watched a variety of Saddam speeches during the run up to the war today.
His bottom teeth are most certainly f-ed up.With his big ass mustache and no reason to smile his shiny uppers are not anywhere to be found.But then again thats not the point of contention...its the lowers.They are not so straight,in fact they look identical to those nasty baked beans during his capture...just a little bit whiter.
Id suggest you do the same.
Theyve matched the DNA,which of course could be faked or lied about, but then youve just added a host of folks to the conspiracy.
In any case,if I play devils advocate and we say that the teeth dont match,which they do,how do you know the pics you post showing Saddams nice teeth arent of his doubles mug? How old were those photos again?
So you suppose the Shia lynch mob,who took such joy in humilating him at the gallows would simply allow a double to be hung in his place? Or do you think those those guys were fooled as well.Not to mention the massive team of lawyers hired by his wife to defend him? Never once did I hear them state the man they hed been hired to represent wasnt him.
Was his defense team also in on it?
For every Iraqi you find that said 'thats not him' I reckon theres about 1000 that say 'thats him, good riddence'.
Saddam worked for the CIA
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2005/03/saddam-worked-for-cia.html
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r+&hl=en
Richard Sale, UPI Intelligence Correspondent, wrote about Saddam and the CIA on 4/10/2003.
According to Sale, British scholars and former U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials say that Saddam Hussein was used by the U.S. intelligences services for over 40 years.
In 1959, Saddam was part of a CIA-authorized six-man squad trying to assassinate Iraqi Prime Minister Gen. Abd al-Karim Qasim.
CIA operative Miles Copeland told UPI the CIA had had "close ties" with Iraq's Baath Party, and with the Egyptian intelligence service. Roger Morris, a former National Security Council staffer, confirmed that the CIA had chosen the Baath Party "as its instrument."
According to another former senior State Department official, Saddam was in his early 20s, when he became a part of the U.S. plot to get rid of Qasim.
Adel Darwish, Middle East expert and author of "Unholy Babylon," said that Saddam's CIA handler was an Iraqi dentist working for CIA and Egyptian intelligence. U.S. officials separately confirmed Darwish's account.
The 1959 assassination was botched. Qasim escaped death, and Saddam escaped to Tikrit, thanks to CIA and Egyptian intelligence agents, several U.S. government officials said.
Saddam then moved to Beirut, according to Darwish and former senior CIA officials. In Beirut, the CIA put Saddam through a training course, former CIA officials said.
Saddam then moved to Cairo. According to former U.S. intelligence officials, Saddam made frequent visits to the American Embassy.
In 1963 Qasim was killed in a Baath Party coup. Morris claimed that the CIA was behind the coup.
The CIA provided the Iraqi National Guardsmen with lists of suspected communists who were then murdered, according to former U.S. intelligence officials.
Middle East expert Adel Darwish told UPI that Saddam presided over the mass killings.
A former senior CIA official said: "It was a bit like the mysterious killings of Iran's communists just after Ayatollah Khomeini came to power in 1979. All 4,000 of his communists suddenly got killed."
Saddam became head of al-Jihaz a-Khas, the secret intelligence service of the Baath Party.
The CIA/Defense Intelligence Agency connection with Saddam continued.
According to a former DIA official, the U.S. shared satellite intelligence with both Iraq and Iran during the Iran-Iraq war in an attempt to produce a military stalemate.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2005/03/saddam-worked-for-cia.html
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cach...view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r+&hl=en
Richard Sale, UPI Intelligence Correspondent, wrote about Saddam and the CIA on 4/10/2003.
According to Sale, British scholars and former U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials say that Saddam Hussein was used by the U.S. intelligences services for over 40 years.
In 1959, Saddam was part of a CIA-authorized six-man squad trying to assassinate Iraqi Prime Minister Gen. Abd al-Karim Qasim.
CIA operative Miles Copeland told UPI the CIA had had "close ties" with Iraq's Baath Party, and with the Egyptian intelligence service. Roger Morris, a former National Security Council staffer, confirmed that the CIA had chosen the Baath Party "as its instrument."
According to another former senior State Department official, Saddam was in his early 20s, when he became a part of the U.S. plot to get rid of Qasim.
Adel Darwish, Middle East expert and author of "Unholy Babylon," said that Saddam's CIA handler was an Iraqi dentist working for CIA and Egyptian intelligence. U.S. officials separately confirmed Darwish's account.
The 1959 assassination was botched. Qasim escaped death, and Saddam escaped to Tikrit, thanks to CIA and Egyptian intelligence agents, several U.S. government officials said.
Saddam then moved to Beirut, according to Darwish and former senior CIA officials. In Beirut, the CIA put Saddam through a training course, former CIA officials said.
Saddam then moved to Cairo. According to former U.S. intelligence officials, Saddam made frequent visits to the American Embassy.
In 1963 Qasim was killed in a Baath Party coup. Morris claimed that the CIA was behind the coup.
The CIA provided the Iraqi National Guardsmen with lists of suspected communists who were then murdered, according to former U.S. intelligence officials.
Middle East expert Adel Darwish told UPI that Saddam presided over the mass killings.
A former senior CIA official said: "It was a bit like the mysterious killings of Iran's communists just after Ayatollah Khomeini came to power in 1979. All 4,000 of his communists suddenly got killed."
Saddam became head of al-Jihaz a-Khas, the secret intelligence service of the Baath Party.
The CIA/Defense Intelligence Agency connection with Saddam continued.
According to a former DIA official, the U.S. shared satellite intelligence with both Iraq and Iran during the Iran-Iraq war in an attempt to produce a military stalemate.
Mrs. Saddam says defendant Saddam is not her Saddam
From: Idaho Observer: Mrs. Saddam says defendant is not her husband
According to Lauren, upwards of 60% of well-known Americans and other world figures are covert operatives of the ol' CIA
If you're reading this post while in a room with at least four other people, look to your left, look to your right and look both forward and back.
If at least three of the four people you see are NOT covert operatives of the CIA, then I guess that leaves YOU.
If you're reading this post while in a room with at least four other people, look to your left, look to your right and look both forward and back.
If at least three of the four people you see are NOT covert operatives of the CIA, then I guess that leaves YOU.
<TABLE style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" class=tborder border=0 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center><TBODY><TR title="Post 6752760" vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=125 align=middle>BASEHEAD</TD><TD class=alt1>Teeth? This is it?
YES IT IS. INVESTIGATORS PREFER TO CALL IT FORENSIC SCIENCE - WHERE EVIDENCE IS USED EVERY DAY IN COURTROOMS TO INDICT PEOPLE OR AQUIT THEM OR JUST IDENTIFY THEM. YOU TALK AS IF TEETH ARENT VERY GOOD EVIDENCE IN CASES OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY.
A VERY POOR SUPPOSITION I MIGHT ADD.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
YES IT IS. INVESTIGATORS PREFER TO CALL IT FORENSIC SCIENCE - WHERE EVIDENCE IS USED EVERY DAY IN COURTROOMS TO INDICT PEOPLE OR AQUIT THEM OR JUST IDENTIFY THEM. YOU TALK AS IF TEETH ARENT VERY GOOD EVIDENCE IN CASES OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY.
A VERY POOR SUPPOSITION I MIGHT ADD.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
WHAT ELSE YOU SAYIN BASE?
Ive watched a variety of Saddam speeches during the run up to the war today.
His bottom teeth are most certainly f-ed up.
SO YOU ARE READY TO BELIEVE THAT SEVEN MONTHS ON THE RUN DID THAT KIND OF DAMAGE TO HIS (THE REAL SADDAM'S) TEETH AND REVERSED HIS BITE PLANE AS WELL?
With his big ass mustache
THE MUSTACHE IM AFRAID WAS A STAGE PROP TO DIVERT YOU AWAY FROM HIS WEAKNESS AS A DOUBLE- HIS TEETH.
and no reason to smile his shiny uppers are not anywhere to be found.
EXCEPT THIS MAN HAS NO UPPERS TO SMILE WITH!
But then again thats not the point of contention...its the lowers.
wRONG. BOTH THE UPPER AND LOWER TEETH SHOW EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.
They are not so straight,in fact they look identical to those nasty baked beans during his capture...just a little bit whiter.
GLOSSING OVER THE IMPORTANT FACTS TO HAMMER HOME YOUR THEORY THAT THE REASON THE TEETH DONT MATCH IS BECAUSE THEY ARE DISCOLORED.
Id suggest you do the same.
BELIEVE ME I HAVE.
Ive watched a variety of Saddam speeches during the run up to the war today.
His bottom teeth are most certainly f-ed up.
SO YOU ARE READY TO BELIEVE THAT SEVEN MONTHS ON THE RUN DID THAT KIND OF DAMAGE TO HIS (THE REAL SADDAM'S) TEETH AND REVERSED HIS BITE PLANE AS WELL?
With his big ass mustache
THE MUSTACHE IM AFRAID WAS A STAGE PROP TO DIVERT YOU AWAY FROM HIS WEAKNESS AS A DOUBLE- HIS TEETH.
and no reason to smile his shiny uppers are not anywhere to be found.
EXCEPT THIS MAN HAS NO UPPERS TO SMILE WITH!
But then again thats not the point of contention...its the lowers.
wRONG. BOTH THE UPPER AND LOWER TEETH SHOW EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.
They are not so straight,in fact they look identical to those nasty baked beans during his capture...just a little bit whiter.
GLOSSING OVER THE IMPORTANT FACTS TO HAMMER HOME YOUR THEORY THAT THE REASON THE TEETH DONT MATCH IS BECAUSE THEY ARE DISCOLORED.
Id suggest you do the same.
BELIEVE ME I HAVE.
FINISHING UP....
Theyve matched the DNA,which of course could be faked or lied about
OF COURSE
, but then youve just added a host of folks to the conspiracy.
TESTERS DONT KNOW THEYRE PART OF THE CONSPIRACY. THEY CAN ONLY IDENTIFY WHAT THEY ARE GIVEN.
In any case,if I play devils advocate and we say that the teeth dont match,which they do,how do you know the pics you post showing Saddams nice teeth arent of his doubles mug? How old were those photos again?
YOU DONT BUT GIVEN THAT YOU CANNOT SAY THAT YOU KNOW THAT THE MAN THEY HUNG WASNT A DOUBLE EITHER CAN YOU?
IF I WERE YOU I WOULD TEND TO BELIEVE THE EARLY PICS ARE GENUINE. BEFORE THE CIA GOT THEIR CLAWS TOO DEEP INTO HIM AND MADE HIM A MAN WHO WOULD ACTUALLY NEED DOUBLES.
So you suppose the Shia lynch mob,who took such joy in humilating him at the gallows would simply allow a double to be hung in his place?
WHAT SHIA LYNCH MOB? THATS THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE AGAIN.
ALL STAGED. ALL STORIES CONCOCTED TO INJECT FALSE FRAMES OF REFERENCE JUST AS YOU HAVE FALLEN FOR. DISINFO- MISINFO AND LIES. SEE HOW EASYILY THEY CAN CONTROL WHAT YOU THINK ARE FACTS.
Or do you think those those guys were fooled as well.Not to mention the massive team of lawyers hired by his wife to defend him?
HIS WIFE THOUGHT IT WAS HER HUSBAND SHE WAS PAYING FOR DEFENDING. THEY WOULDNT ACCEED TO HER DEMANDS YO SEE HIM. WHEN SHE FINALLY DID IT WAS A FARCE.
SEE THE NEW ANGELINA JOLIE MOVIE OUT NOW "THE CHANGLING"
SAME ATTEMPT TO MAKE CORRUPTION DISPELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IDENTITY.
Never once did I hear them state the man they hed been hired to represent wasnt him.
bECAUSE THE ENTIRE AFFAIR WAS STAGED. OF COURSE THEY CAN NEVER BRING UP HIS APPEARANCE.
Was his defense team also in on it?
WHAT DEFENSE TEAM? THERE WAS NO REAL TRIAL. IT WAS A KANGEROO COURT. YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS.
For every Iraqi you find that said 'thats not him' I reckon theres about 1000 that say 'thats him, good riddence'
YOU RECKON WRONG. IRAQIS ARE ALOT SMARTER THAT YOU THINK.
IT WAS ALL RIGGED UP BEFOREHAND. THATS WHY IT WAS NEVER MADE A PUBLIC TRIAL THAT AMERICANS COULD WATCH LIKE COURT TV DOES.:grandmais
Theyve matched the DNA,which of course could be faked or lied about
OF COURSE
, but then youve just added a host of folks to the conspiracy.
TESTERS DONT KNOW THEYRE PART OF THE CONSPIRACY. THEY CAN ONLY IDENTIFY WHAT THEY ARE GIVEN.
In any case,if I play devils advocate and we say that the teeth dont match,which they do,how do you know the pics you post showing Saddams nice teeth arent of his doubles mug? How old were those photos again?
YOU DONT BUT GIVEN THAT YOU CANNOT SAY THAT YOU KNOW THAT THE MAN THEY HUNG WASNT A DOUBLE EITHER CAN YOU?
IF I WERE YOU I WOULD TEND TO BELIEVE THE EARLY PICS ARE GENUINE. BEFORE THE CIA GOT THEIR CLAWS TOO DEEP INTO HIM AND MADE HIM A MAN WHO WOULD ACTUALLY NEED DOUBLES.
So you suppose the Shia lynch mob,who took such joy in humilating him at the gallows would simply allow a double to be hung in his place?
WHAT SHIA LYNCH MOB? THATS THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE AGAIN.
ALL STAGED. ALL STORIES CONCOCTED TO INJECT FALSE FRAMES OF REFERENCE JUST AS YOU HAVE FALLEN FOR. DISINFO- MISINFO AND LIES. SEE HOW EASYILY THEY CAN CONTROL WHAT YOU THINK ARE FACTS.
Or do you think those those guys were fooled as well.Not to mention the massive team of lawyers hired by his wife to defend him?
HIS WIFE THOUGHT IT WAS HER HUSBAND SHE WAS PAYING FOR DEFENDING. THEY WOULDNT ACCEED TO HER DEMANDS YO SEE HIM. WHEN SHE FINALLY DID IT WAS A FARCE.
SEE THE NEW ANGELINA JOLIE MOVIE OUT NOW "THE CHANGLING"
SAME ATTEMPT TO MAKE CORRUPTION DISPELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IDENTITY.
Never once did I hear them state the man they hed been hired to represent wasnt him.
bECAUSE THE ENTIRE AFFAIR WAS STAGED. OF COURSE THEY CAN NEVER BRING UP HIS APPEARANCE.
Was his defense team also in on it?
WHAT DEFENSE TEAM? THERE WAS NO REAL TRIAL. IT WAS A KANGEROO COURT. YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS.
For every Iraqi you find that said 'thats not him' I reckon theres about 1000 that say 'thats him, good riddence'
YOU RECKON WRONG. IRAQIS ARE ALOT SMARTER THAT YOU THINK.
IT WAS ALL RIGGED UP BEFOREHAND. THATS WHY IT WAS NEVER MADE A PUBLIC TRIAL THAT AMERICANS COULD WATCH LIKE COURT TV DOES.:grandmais
Oh TR where to begin.....
Undated photos of teeth (which actually match the disputed teeth in question) would not qualify as forensic evidence,most likely wouldnt even be allowed into a trial.Perhaps official dental records is what you allude to?You have those?DNA on the other hand,is the foremost method of ID.
We know how the DNA tests turned out right?
Anyway the trial was televised for a significant period,at least until Saddam forced them to remove them:
<!-- #adxToolSponsor --><!-- .toolsContainer --><!-- .articleTools --><!-- .toolsRight -->
Published: March 23, 2006
To the Editor:
Re ''What Every Iraqi Should See'' (editorial, March 16):
Court TV has long been a proponent of cameras in our country's courtrooms and was an advocate for televised coverage of Saddam Hussein's trial. The original presiding judge agreed with our position and permitted a camera in the courtroom, saying ''we have nothing to hide.''
Over the last several months, the world has been able to see Saddam Hussein for itself, complete with his occasional outbursts. For the very reason that a camera should be in the courtroom in this new era of transparency, we now support the current chief judge's decision to remove the camera.
We have always believed that cameras should act as an impartial observer of courtroom proceedings. But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side, removing cameras seems appropriate.
Now that it is clear that Saddam Hussein is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda, he should not be allowed access to a world stage. We continue to campaign for cameras in courtrooms where trials are ably presided over by judges who maintain a proper level of decorum on behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
Henry Schleiff
Chairman and Chief Executive
Court TV
New York, March 20, 2006
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B00E7D81630F930A15750C0A9609C8B63
The defense team was hired after his wife supposedly was shown the Saddam who wasnt Saddam. Why would she bother? And the adding pro Bush,super neo con Ramsey Clarke to the conspiracy seems awfully risky.Not to mention one of the prominent lawyers she hired to represent him was Bouchra Khalil ,a family lawyer and long time freind of the Husseins? He was also in on it?
I see uppers and an overbite in one of his few smile during his court case.
What lynch mob....lol
Undated photos of teeth (which actually match the disputed teeth in question) would not qualify as forensic evidence,most likely wouldnt even be allowed into a trial.Perhaps official dental records is what you allude to?You have those?DNA on the other hand,is the foremost method of ID.
We know how the DNA tests turned out right?
Anyway the trial was televised for a significant period,at least until Saddam forced them to remove them:
TV at the Hussein Trial <!-- ADX= Frame4A -->
<!-- #adxToolSponsor --><!-- .toolsContainer --><!-- .articleTools --><!-- .toolsRight -->
Published: March 23, 2006
To the Editor:
Re ''What Every Iraqi Should See'' (editorial, March 16):
Court TV has long been a proponent of cameras in our country's courtrooms and was an advocate for televised coverage of Saddam Hussein's trial. The original presiding judge agreed with our position and permitted a camera in the courtroom, saying ''we have nothing to hide.''
Over the last several months, the world has been able to see Saddam Hussein for itself, complete with his occasional outbursts. For the very reason that a camera should be in the courtroom in this new era of transparency, we now support the current chief judge's decision to remove the camera.
We have always believed that cameras should act as an impartial observer of courtroom proceedings. But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side, removing cameras seems appropriate.
Now that it is clear that Saddam Hussein is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda, he should not be allowed access to a world stage. We continue to campaign for cameras in courtrooms where trials are ably presided over by judges who maintain a proper level of decorum on behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
Henry Schleiff
Chairman and Chief Executive
Court TV
New York, March 20, 2006
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B00E7D81630F930A15750C0A9609C8B63
The defense team was hired after his wife supposedly was shown the Saddam who wasnt Saddam. Why would she bother? And the adding pro Bush,super neo con Ramsey Clarke to the conspiracy seems awfully risky.Not to mention one of the prominent lawyers she hired to represent him was Bouchra Khalil ,a family lawyer and long time freind of the Husseins? He was also in on it?
I see uppers and an overbite in one of his few smile during his court case.
What lynch mob....lol
BASEHEAD Oh TR where to begin.....
Undated photos of teeth (which actually match the disputed teeth in question) would not qualify as forensic evidence,most likely wouldnt even be allowed into a trial.Perhaps official dental records is what you allude to?You have those?DNA on the other hand,is the foremost method of ID.
OF COURSE IM TALKING ABOUT DENTAL RECORDS.
We know how the DNA tests turned out right?
SURE WE KNOW THAT THEY WERE GIVEN DNA FRON THE REAL SADDAM - NOT THE GUY THEY TRIED.
THEY DO THEIR JOB. THEYRE NOT "IN ON IT."
Anyway the trial was televised for a significant period,at least until Saddam forced them to remove them:
IF YOU ARE CALLING THE TRIAL INDEPENDENT THEN YOU KNOW NOTHING. THE TRIAL WAS PAID FOR BY BUSH WITH U.S. MONEY. THREE LAWYERS FOR THE DEFENSE WERE MURDERED FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE OBVIOUS. THEY EVIDENTLY HAD A BACKBONE AND REFUSED TO BE INTIMIDATED. THEY BELIEVED IN THE RULE OF LAW. DEFENSE WITNESSES WERE THREATENED WITH IMPRISONMENT FOR EVER MENTIONING THAT THEY DONT BELIEVE ITS THE REAL SADDAM ON TRIAL DURING ANY TESTIMONY THEY MAY BE CALLED UPON TO GIVE.
THIS WASNT A TRIAL. IT WAS A TRIBUNAL. IT WAS A FARCE A JOKE AND A KANGEROO COURT.
Quote:
<TABLE dir=ltr border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width=624><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=center>IT WAS ALL RIGGED UP BEFOREHAND. THATS WHY IT WAS NEVER MADE A PUBLIC TRIAL THAT AMERICANS COULD WATCH LIKE COURT TV DOES
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
TV at the Hussein Trial
Published: March 23, 2006
To the Editor:
Re ''What Every Iraqi Should See'' (editorial, March 16):
Court TV has long been a proponent of cameras in our country's courtrooms and was an advocate for televised coverage of Saddam Hussein's trial. The original presiding judge agreed with our position and permitted a camera in the courtroom, saying ''we have nothing to hide.''
Over the last several months, the world has been able to see Saddam Hussein for itself, complete with his occasional outbursts. For the very reason that a camera should be in the courtroom in this new era of transparency, we now support the current chief judge's decision to remove the camera.
We have always believed that cameras should act as an impartial observer of courtroom proceedings. But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side, removing cameras seems appropriate.
Now that it is clear that Saddam Hussein is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda, he should not be allowed access to a world stage. We continue to campaign for cameras in courtrooms where trials are ably presided over by judges who maintain a proper level of decorum on behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
Henry Schleiff
Chairman and Chief Executive
Court TV
New York, March 20, 2006
SO YOU ARE USING A TALKING POINTS MEMO FROM AN EXEC AT COURT TV PRAISING THE MERITS OF TELEVISED TRIALS WHILE DEFENDING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLOSED ONES.
WHAT TALKING POINTS YOU SAY? LEMME BREAK IT DOWN FOR YA.
(1) ''we have nothing to hide.''...
BUT:
(2) But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side...
BECAUSE SADDAM:
(3) is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda....
THEN:
(4) removing cameras seems appropriate
(5) he should not be allowed access to a world stage (THATS MEANS YOU)
(6) On behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
SO THEY MADE SURE THAT THE FARCE DIDNT REACH THE OUTSODE WORLD. CONTAINMENT WAS THE ONLY OPTION. SO YOU DECLARE THE DEFENDANT "DISRUPTIVE" AND THE SCREEN FADES TO BLACK.
WHY DIDNT THEY PUT HIM IN A GLASS SOUNDPROOF BOOTH AND BE ABLE TO TURN OF HIS MICROPHONE IF HE STARTS SPEAKING OUT OF TURN? IT HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE- IN THE ADOLF EICHMAN TRIAL I BELIEVE IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME WELL. I WAS JUST A KID WHEN I SAW IT.
NOW YOU CAN CLEARLY ASCERTAIN THE REAL REASON FOR "SHUTTING IT DOWN"
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...50C0A9609C8B63
Quote:
<TABLE dir=ltr border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width=624><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=center>HIS WIFE THOUGHT IT WAS HER HUSBAND SHE WAS PAYING FOR DEFENDING. THEY WOULDNT ACCEED TO HER DEMANDS YO SEE HIM. WHEN SHE FINALLY DID IT WAS A FARCE.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The defense team was hired after his wife supposedly was shown the Saddam who wasnt Saddam. Why would she bother?
AFTER HER OUTBURST OUTSIDE THE JAIL SHE WAS PROBABLY THREATENED AND FORCED INTO PAYING FOR THIS FARCE. OR ELSE SHE WAS TOLD THE TRUTH ONLY IF SHE SIGNED A WHISTLEBLOWER CLAUSE THAT BASICALLY SAYS IF YOU TRY TO REVEAL THE TRUTH YOU ARE ABOUT TO LEARN TO OUTSIDE SOURCES IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN BECAUSE ALL MAJOR NEWS OUTLETS WORLDWIDE ARE CONTROLLED.
And the adding pro Bush,super neo con Ramsey Clarke to the conspiracy seems awfully risky.Not to mention one of the prominent lawyers she hired to represent him was Bouchra Khalil ,a family lawyer and long time freind of the Husseins? He was also in on it?
HE WOULD BE YES- OBVIOUSLY BEING A FAMILY FRIEND HE WOULD BE THE FIRST TO SEE THAT THIS MAN WAS AN IMPOSTER. BUT "IN ON IT" NOT AS EVIL DOES BUT AS GOOD DOES WHEN IT REALIZES THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO PLAY ALONG.
UNLESS YOUVE GONE UP AGAINST SUCH A POWER YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND THE PRESSURES BROUGHT TO BEAR IN SUCH A SITUATION. I HAVE A FEELING THE DEATHS OF THE SHALL WE SAY LESSER IN STATURE LAWYERS SETS THE TONE FOR SUCH PRESSURES FELT BY ALL HIS LAWYERS. RAMSEY CLARKE WAS THERE TO LEND SOME CREDIBILITY BUT WAS A GAME PLAYER AS WELL BY REMAINING NEUTRAL ON THE ISSUE.
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...TRIAL+COURT&ndsp=20&hl=en&sa=N&start=380&um=1
I see uppers and an overbite in one of his few smile during his court case.
SURE HE HAS UPPERS. BUT THEY ARE BEHIND HIS LOWERS SO THEY ARE NOT USUALLY SEEN- UNLIKE THE BUGS BUNNY CHOPPERS THE REAL SADDAM FLASHED AT EVERYONE. THATS WHAT I MEANT. HE DOESNT HAVE THE RIGHT KIND OF UPPERS IS WHAT I WAS SAYING..
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...TRIAL+COURT&ndsp=20&hl=en&sa=N&start=420&um=1
What lynch mob....lol
CIA GUYS IN SKI MASKS DOES NOT MAKE A SHIA LYNCH MOB.
Undated photos of teeth (which actually match the disputed teeth in question) would not qualify as forensic evidence,most likely wouldnt even be allowed into a trial.Perhaps official dental records is what you allude to?You have those?DNA on the other hand,is the foremost method of ID.
OF COURSE IM TALKING ABOUT DENTAL RECORDS.
We know how the DNA tests turned out right?
SURE WE KNOW THAT THEY WERE GIVEN DNA FRON THE REAL SADDAM - NOT THE GUY THEY TRIED.
THEY DO THEIR JOB. THEYRE NOT "IN ON IT."
Anyway the trial was televised for a significant period,at least until Saddam forced them to remove them:
IF YOU ARE CALLING THE TRIAL INDEPENDENT THEN YOU KNOW NOTHING. THE TRIAL WAS PAID FOR BY BUSH WITH U.S. MONEY. THREE LAWYERS FOR THE DEFENSE WERE MURDERED FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE OBVIOUS. THEY EVIDENTLY HAD A BACKBONE AND REFUSED TO BE INTIMIDATED. THEY BELIEVED IN THE RULE OF LAW. DEFENSE WITNESSES WERE THREATENED WITH IMPRISONMENT FOR EVER MENTIONING THAT THEY DONT BELIEVE ITS THE REAL SADDAM ON TRIAL DURING ANY TESTIMONY THEY MAY BE CALLED UPON TO GIVE.
THIS WASNT A TRIAL. IT WAS A TRIBUNAL. IT WAS A FARCE A JOKE AND A KANGEROO COURT.
Quote:
<TABLE dir=ltr border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width=624><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=center>IT WAS ALL RIGGED UP BEFOREHAND. THATS WHY IT WAS NEVER MADE A PUBLIC TRIAL THAT AMERICANS COULD WATCH LIKE COURT TV DOES
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
TV at the Hussein Trial
Published: March 23, 2006
To the Editor:
Re ''What Every Iraqi Should See'' (editorial, March 16):
Court TV has long been a proponent of cameras in our country's courtrooms and was an advocate for televised coverage of Saddam Hussein's trial. The original presiding judge agreed with our position and permitted a camera in the courtroom, saying ''we have nothing to hide.''
Over the last several months, the world has been able to see Saddam Hussein for itself, complete with his occasional outbursts. For the very reason that a camera should be in the courtroom in this new era of transparency, we now support the current chief judge's decision to remove the camera.
We have always believed that cameras should act as an impartial observer of courtroom proceedings. But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side, removing cameras seems appropriate.
Now that it is clear that Saddam Hussein is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda, he should not be allowed access to a world stage. We continue to campaign for cameras in courtrooms where trials are ably presided over by judges who maintain a proper level of decorum on behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
Henry Schleiff
Chairman and Chief Executive
Court TV
New York, March 20, 2006
SO YOU ARE USING A TALKING POINTS MEMO FROM AN EXEC AT COURT TV PRAISING THE MERITS OF TELEVISED TRIALS WHILE DEFENDING THE RIGHT TO HAVE CLOSED ONES.
WHAT TALKING POINTS YOU SAY? LEMME BREAK IT DOWN FOR YA.
(1) ''we have nothing to hide.''...
BUT:
(2) But when televised coverage is manipulated to the advantage of one side...
BECAUSE SADDAM:
(3) is using this opportunity to perpetuate his own disruptive agenda....
THEN:
(4) removing cameras seems appropriate
(5) he should not be allowed access to a world stage (THATS MEANS YOU)
(6) On behalf of those who seek justice, not theater.
SO THEY MADE SURE THAT THE FARCE DIDNT REACH THE OUTSODE WORLD. CONTAINMENT WAS THE ONLY OPTION. SO YOU DECLARE THE DEFENDANT "DISRUPTIVE" AND THE SCREEN FADES TO BLACK.
WHY DIDNT THEY PUT HIM IN A GLASS SOUNDPROOF BOOTH AND BE ABLE TO TURN OF HIS MICROPHONE IF HE STARTS SPEAKING OUT OF TURN? IT HAS BEEN DONE BEFORE- IN THE ADOLF EICHMAN TRIAL I BELIEVE IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME WELL. I WAS JUST A KID WHEN I SAW IT.
NOW YOU CAN CLEARLY ASCERTAIN THE REAL REASON FOR "SHUTTING IT DOWN"
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...50C0A9609C8B63
Quote:
<TABLE dir=ltr border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width=624><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=center>HIS WIFE THOUGHT IT WAS HER HUSBAND SHE WAS PAYING FOR DEFENDING. THEY WOULDNT ACCEED TO HER DEMANDS YO SEE HIM. WHEN SHE FINALLY DID IT WAS A FARCE.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The defense team was hired after his wife supposedly was shown the Saddam who wasnt Saddam. Why would she bother?
AFTER HER OUTBURST OUTSIDE THE JAIL SHE WAS PROBABLY THREATENED AND FORCED INTO PAYING FOR THIS FARCE. OR ELSE SHE WAS TOLD THE TRUTH ONLY IF SHE SIGNED A WHISTLEBLOWER CLAUSE THAT BASICALLY SAYS IF YOU TRY TO REVEAL THE TRUTH YOU ARE ABOUT TO LEARN TO OUTSIDE SOURCES IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN BECAUSE ALL MAJOR NEWS OUTLETS WORLDWIDE ARE CONTROLLED.
And the adding pro Bush,super neo con Ramsey Clarke to the conspiracy seems awfully risky.Not to mention one of the prominent lawyers she hired to represent him was Bouchra Khalil ,a family lawyer and long time freind of the Husseins? He was also in on it?
HE WOULD BE YES- OBVIOUSLY BEING A FAMILY FRIEND HE WOULD BE THE FIRST TO SEE THAT THIS MAN WAS AN IMPOSTER. BUT "IN ON IT" NOT AS EVIL DOES BUT AS GOOD DOES WHEN IT REALIZES THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION BUT TO PLAY ALONG.
UNLESS YOUVE GONE UP AGAINST SUCH A POWER YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND THE PRESSURES BROUGHT TO BEAR IN SUCH A SITUATION. I HAVE A FEELING THE DEATHS OF THE SHALL WE SAY LESSER IN STATURE LAWYERS SETS THE TONE FOR SUCH PRESSURES FELT BY ALL HIS LAWYERS. RAMSEY CLARKE WAS THERE TO LEND SOME CREDIBILITY BUT WAS A GAME PLAYER AS WELL BY REMAINING NEUTRAL ON THE ISSUE.
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...TRIAL+COURT&ndsp=20&hl=en&sa=N&start=380&um=1
I see uppers and an overbite in one of his few smile during his court case.
SURE HE HAS UPPERS. BUT THEY ARE BEHIND HIS LOWERS SO THEY ARE NOT USUALLY SEEN- UNLIKE THE BUGS BUNNY CHOPPERS THE REAL SADDAM FLASHED AT EVERYONE. THATS WHAT I MEANT. HE DOESNT HAVE THE RIGHT KIND OF UPPERS IS WHAT I WAS SAYING..
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...TRIAL+COURT&ndsp=20&hl=en&sa=N&start=420&um=1
What lynch mob....lol
CIA GUYS IN SKI MASKS DOES NOT MAKE A SHIA LYNCH MOB.
