Link to Twin Aces Casino on Rx front page??????????????????

SunDevil · Dec 3, 2003

Shrink,

I know nothing of this casino, but if they are truly the rogue that they are reported to be then what is to stop the new owner from putting up and ad for SBG, Black Rhino, etc? If you fail to object to one rogue advertiser it just opens the floodgates. I can't believe that you can't see that.

Mjulian · Dec 3, 2003

"The new owner put one friggin link to his casino on the home page...

It doesn't mean that I would recomment them, nor are they on our PREFERRED LIST...

God forbid an owner wants free advertising?"

Yeah well God forbid it appears the owner is a fukin stiff!

BillyB+ · Dec 3, 2003

New owner put a stiff casino up on the RX so now if a book's in trouble the book can stay up as long as the new owner is greased

LazyEye+ · Dec 3, 2003

this is very disturbing. is this whats going on here general. this is the first gambling board that i posted at and i get this shit. if i can't trust the owner of this site then i'll be gone. if anything i believe in paying debts and this place obviously doesn't agree with that

Ladeda · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by THE SHRINK:
The new owner put one friggin link to his casino on the home page...

It doesn't mean that I would recomment them, nor are they on our PREFERRED LIST...

God forbid an owner wants free advertising?

THE SHRINK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Of course Mr Jensen is the owner and can do whatever he wants. Just because this is the #1 online sportsbook site now doesn't mean it will stay that way. Sometimes industry leaders for they can do no wrong. This isn't the end of RX, but the sale to this guy sure seems like a turning point.

Shrink, You have to expect these type of complaints to arise. It is no different then Russ selling his site to the BetFlamingo or Reggie from Blue Marlin and telling everyone it is no big deal after they put up their BetFlamingo banner.

drunk · Dec 3, 2003

Shrink, I think you need to visit a shrink. Why would you want to be associated with a known con-artist scammer. I thought this site was your "BABY". I guess you sold out for the money. This site is no longer a watchdog, its as bad as sting's piece of shit site. My recomendation to all who visit here is not to make any decision regarding a sportsbook from what the "SHRINK" recomends. play with your local, like the old days. If you have to play offshore stick with the top tier books. You know who they are. I think the Shrinks gone crazy.

docdekay · Dec 3, 2003

I love how they think shit like this will just be swept under the carpet. Unfu(king real.

spidermonkey · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Chuck Sims:
David, do you consider yourself part owner of The RX? Since it was your money and many others who were stiffed by the new owner that bought The RX.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

JudgeWapner · Dec 3, 2003

The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'.

-Slim- · Dec 3, 2003

Ok, even Im getting a tad scared with all the questions and people claiming they got stiffed......

I have absolutely no clue who this Marty fellow is but I think, if he was interested in buying this website, perhaps he should be interested in at least attempting to step up to the plate and answer a few questions.

If one owes nothing, one fears nothing.

Im sure a few people here would like a formal introduction, might as well take advantage of this opportunity.

Slash · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by -SLIM-:
If one owes nothing, one fears nothing.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't remember the exact amount he stole from the Danes, but I think we are in the 100k region.

PatrickMcIrish · Dec 3, 2003

I've sent a message to him as well. I have less than zero knowledge of on-line casino's, I wouldn't know a good one from a bad one. Maybe he can speak on all these allegations from days past. Will pass on anything I get back if it's not posted here first. Carry on....

Guest · Dec 3, 2003

Appreciate it Irish. I know you're not obligated to ask anything on our behalf but it would be nice to hear from the source.

Thanks and good luck tonight...

sb

Buzzsaw · Dec 3, 2003

McIrish,
Just curious, if it turns out the new owner is a stiff, will that effect your status here?

Slash · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Buzzsaw:
McIrish,
Just curious, if it turns out the new owner is a stiff, will that effect your status here?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Hasn't this been proven already??? Does anyone here still think that Marty hasn't stolen thousands of dollars?

Ladeda · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Buzzsaw:
McIrish,
Just curious, if it turns out the new owner is a stiff, will that effect your status here?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Hey Buzz,

Ever notice how strongly The RX defends it's friends and advertisers here? Take for example the Rio siuation.

Now look at all that has been posted about the RX's NEW OWNER! Don't you think it is strange that no one comes to his defense except for some who say he seems to be a "good guy."
Shrink and moderators were extremely quiet on the issue until being forced to respond and even then the all stuck their heads in the sand with the "don't know much about online casinos...yada..yada.."

To be honest, if I were in Shrinks shoes I would do the same thing. There is no defense for Jensen and his casinos. The proof of his thieving ways have been public record for years now. What else can Shrink do? The damage has been done. I would like to think he was unaware of Jensens past when he sold , but who knows.

PatrickMcIrish · Dec 3, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Buzzsaw:
McIrish,
Just curious, if it turns out the new owner is a stiff, will that effect your status here?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't know for certain, would have to see all the facts first. If I did move on it will be because I decided to for whatever reason, not because of any pressure from people who wanted me to quit. The whole If you don't resign you are making a statement you support this activity..... has never really worked for me. I'm not the smartest guy in the world so generally attack life by doing things I enjoy. My wife gets hounded by relatives who belong to PETA so I get the updates on how I am making a vicious statement against all animals every time I eat a steak. When I was a sophomore playing baseball we were pressured and made to feel guilty as the AD was accussed of being a womanizer. Every activist group on campus told us we were supporting this behavior if we showed up on the ballfield. I did my regular 0-4 with an error but showed up and played ball as always. I tend to be in the game versus sitting in the stands throwing peanut shells at the participants and passing judgement on those who dare suit up every day.

Anyway don't want to paint myself into a corner but I have always believed a man represents himself by his own actions, not by who others can link to him somehow. Athletic directors who can't keep their ding dong in their pants, cows over in India, or a mystical owner of the RX I have never met, I only speak for myself in my dealings. Others can see it differently of course but my actions and my actions alone will define who I am and what I am about. Let the attacks begin on me if it makes you feel better Buzz. When the guy in the mirror and his family are proud of him the drunken Irishman will always settle for that. Good day.

Buzzsaw · Dec 3, 2003

Ladeda & Slash
I don't know. It's a tough spot for the Shrink and Pat, that's painfully obvious.

Does one work for a known stiff? Does one have a moral obligation to resign if the owner is a thief?

I honestly don't know. I know what I would do if it were me but if I had a family that depended on the Rx paycheck then I think I would stay, right? I mean just because the owner did something wrong should not mean my family should suffer.

I'm just glad I don't have to answer those questions.

Buzzsaw · Dec 3, 2003

btw Pat,
I'm not throwing shots at you on this one Pat although I'm sure you would if our roles were reversed

LOL. Just imagine the fun you would have if a known stiff owned SBR? LOL

All bs aside, personally I would support your decision either way. That's just not something for me to judge and I would hope others would see it the same. You can't control who owns the site and I think most will agree you should not base any decision on the owners past.