the best video I've seen on the subject.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVDdjLQkUV8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVDdjLQkUV8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVDdjLQkUV8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YVDdjLQkUV8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
This plane is clearly coming in around a 45° angle. When the collision occurs the right wing will be flush against the building. Ask any pilot what is going to happen to the left wing and he will tell you it will break off.
I defy anybody to refute the conclusion that aerodynamically the forces on the left wing would rip it right off the fuselage and it would have been seen on the lawn.
See thats where they mess up again. The other planes were straight shots. This plane was different. It came in at an angle. It wouldnt have disintegrated like they said even by their own hyperbolic standards and speed estimates.
No response... because your assertion doesn't make sense.
Again...simple. It's not even about aerodynamic's...the plane isn't flying anymore when it hits the building.
It's straight physics...what you talking about aerodynamics for something that isn't flying?
I fail to see any reason why the left wing should just fall off rather than disintegrate as it did.
Take an aluminum can and rocket it against any concrete wall at +200 mph...get back to us if you find a can...or aluminum dust and fragments.
You are comparing lead to aluminum wrapped around jet fuel...and you question my logic?
No pipe here...are you shooting heroin?
Nevermind...I forgot you are from Cali.
A jet fly's into a building and you think it can't leave a hole...based on what?
Geezus...whats the use with some of you people.
Where did I give you loyalty to the military and Pentagon?...or for that matter that the world is flat?
Again I ask...A jet fly's into a building and you think it can't leave a hole...based on what?
So you're saying that if you put an aluminum can on the front of a race car and drive it at a building and smash into it going 200 miles per hour you won't find the aluminum can? It will have been converted to dust using the old 9/11 recipe for making dust out of steel girders!
<DIR><DIR>Okay, it is straight physics. The left wing will rip off that plane and will detach itself. Once the main body in the right side of the plane has been immobilized by the wall the left wing will continue 500mph. Stress of that will rip the left wing off. It cannot be denied this is Physics 101. Objects will keep traveling in the same direction, if there is no resistance. Newton's 1st Law says an object in motion, i.e., the wing, will travel in a straight line at constant speed until another force acts on it. Since the plane was coming in on an angle both wings did not strike the building at the same time.
</DIR></DIR>When a wet dog walks into your living room and shakes the water off, or you stand stomping snow off your boots it's the same principle. Water with the dog and snow with the boot it is unable to stay attached to the dog or the boot and comes flying off.
Last edited:
Yeah yeah....water coming off cats and dogs...whatever.
I still don't see any reason to believe in your conspiracy theories...or why the plane did anything strange when it slammed into the Pentagon.
And there were parts found...and they were entered as evidence in court.
I believe your facts are mixed up. Sure pieces were found conveniently being able to be carried. As a pieces needed to be placed on the pristine lawn. To look like something was there. People walk around dropping pieces off placing samples of what they thought were similar plane parts, but in some cases, the engines were found to be incompatible a rotor from a Rolls-Royce engine that has nothing to do with parts from American Airlines . What court? Might as well be a kangaroo court , a secret military tribunal, because as far as I know, no pieces out any of the four planes that supposedly crashed have ever, been officially identified as coming from those particular planes. Find one piece of evidence that a piece was positively identified that specifies the special aircraft ID number that's on every piece, every plane part of a commercial airliner that is unique to that plane, and therefore identifies it unequivocally. Nothing like that has ever been done, and it won't be because there were no planes.
Pretty much the same story for the World Trade Center and for the Pentagon and Shanksville. No information ever given to the public about the true identification of those parts linking them to the actual aircraft they say were involved . I guess we're supposed to take their word for it the same way we take their word for it when they say there's no other video captures of the event except three frames in the most heavily surveilled institution on the planet . The Pentagon. And I'm not just talking surveillance cameras. Do you know they have satellites in space watching them 24-7? Of course. They do. Cheney tricked them into thinking it was just an exercise however. Thing is, it was. An exercise in psychological operations against your mind. They attempted to make up your mind They are still trying. With some they have not been as successful as they had hoped. In a perfect world you know?.
Pretty much the same story for the World Trade Center and for the Pentagon and Shanksville. No information ever given to the public about the true identification of those parts linking them to the actual aircraft they say were involved . I guess we're supposed to take their word for it the same way we take their word for it when they say there's no other video captures of the event except three frames in the most heavily surveilled institution on the planet . The Pentagon. And I'm not just talking surveillance cameras. Do you know they have satellites in space watching them 24-7? Of course. They do. Cheney tricked them into thinking it was just an exercise however. Thing is, it was. An exercise in psychological operations against your mind. They attempted to make up your mind They are still trying. With some they have not been as successful as they had hoped. In a perfect world you know?.
Last edited:
I would love to see the plane hit the pentagon. I truly believe it never happened.
It's still baffling that a steel skyscraper is capable of collapsing from a fire. I still argue with people about that one.
Maybe I just refuse to believe all the coincidences that happened that day, it's possible like anything is, but highly unlikely.
It's still baffling that a steel skyscraper is capable of collapsing from a fire. I still argue with people about that one.
Maybe I just refuse to believe all the coincidences that happened that day, it's possible like anything is, but highly unlikely.
And what plane do you think that came from? I'm sorry, but without proper identification, it proves nothing. Could easily have fallen off the back of a pickup truck rounding the corner. Know what I mean?
Yeah sure...the CIA has invisible cloking that allowed it's agents to secretly dump thousands of airplane parts in downtown Manhattan at 9 am. on a business day...and nobody noticed.
LMAO...
