Now where did I put that link...
Oh, here it is:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-10-03-bush-troops_x.htm
:finger::nopityA:
Oh, here it is:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-10-03-bush-troops_x.htm
:finger::nopityA:
RobFunk said:
Yes, of course, Rob. All lies. But then why even bother with a patriotic truth squad when there are "anti-war" quotes like this lying around:
"They told the stories at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, tape wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country...."
-- John Kerry
You're right, again. Faced with a choice between a "we'll stand up when they stand down" policy toughening this out, ultimately achieving victory, versus one of the endless Democrat cut'n run proposals -- ooops, I mean "redeployment strategies" -- the ratio would be even higher in Bush's favor.
I guess it is difficult to comment on this post as it puts a bad face on the right wings little war (and from someone we're bringing DEMOCRACY too). So it gets spammed by JoCo. Not one post pertaining to the subject.
Some assholes were having vapors and rending there clothes over Doc doing this.
Business as usual. Fucking dirtbag.
Some assholes were having vapors and rending there clothes over Doc doing this.
Business as usual. Fucking dirtbag.
Awww, Jinn, you're upset I allegedly trashed your thread with off topic spam? I did no such thing. I would never do such a thing. Quite the opposite:
You see, I hold your contributions in high regard. Hence, I did you a favor, reviving your thread, because, if you'll notice, nobody cared. That’s because each point raised in the letter you posted has been debated and refuted in these parts and across the country ad nauseam. To put the letter into a historical context, I'm confident there were many soldiers back in WW II who shared this guy's rosy outlook. He's entitled to his opinion. But he doesn't speak for the vast majority of his colleagues (the letters Basehead posts) which is precisely why I posted the source citing the 4-1 ratio for Bush over Kerry in the armed forces. Although the Martha Murthas would have us believe otherwise, the troops love their current Commander-In-Chief and believe strongly in their mission. Obviously, judging by his anti-Bush cynicism at every stretch, the letter you posted was written by one of those misguided souls who voted for Kerry. What’s the point, again? So this particular soldier wishes he was home safe and sound, making us all sitting ducks for the next 9-11. What can I say, Jinn? Democracy's a bitch.
You see, I hold your contributions in high regard. Hence, I did you a favor, reviving your thread, because, if you'll notice, nobody cared. That’s because each point raised in the letter you posted has been debated and refuted in these parts and across the country ad nauseam. To put the letter into a historical context, I'm confident there were many soldiers back in WW II who shared this guy's rosy outlook. He's entitled to his opinion. But he doesn't speak for the vast majority of his colleagues (the letters Basehead posts) which is precisely why I posted the source citing the 4-1 ratio for Bush over Kerry in the armed forces. Although the Martha Murthas would have us believe otherwise, the troops love their current Commander-In-Chief and believe strongly in their mission. Obviously, judging by his anti-Bush cynicism at every stretch, the letter you posted was written by one of those misguided souls who voted for Kerry. What’s the point, again? So this particular soldier wishes he was home safe and sound, making us all sitting ducks for the next 9-11. What can I say, Jinn? Democracy's a bitch.
Taking a vote of the military about the president or administration policy is like taking a poll of popes to see how they view pro-life stances on the abortion issue.....
Obviously biased crowd there.
Dentists will tell you that sugar is good for your teeth, and gas station owners will tell you those gas sucking SUV's are really hip to have on the highway these days....
Obviously biased crowd there.
Dentists will tell you that sugar is good for your teeth, and gas station owners will tell you those gas sucking SUV's are really hip to have on the highway these days....
