Las Vegas Wild Card Ratings

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 17, 2016
Messages
1,041
Tokens
I ask the same question. And if you look at this years tracking, closing lines have been more accurate to the final score than the openings.

Closing Line absolute error: 8.9692
Opening Line absolute error: 9.0808

Thanks for the analysis.

Only thing is the gross analysis will contain a lot of data points where the line movement has been negligible or very small, so may miss some useful info.

Could you run the analysis for.

1. Games that have moved more than 2pts.

2. Games that have move through/off key numbers.

3. Games where the lines show RLM, not sure if this is possible to get the data points for.

I'd be happy to run if I could get the raw data.

Thanks
 

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
3,584
Tokens
Thanks for the analysis.

Only thing is the gross analysis will contain a lot of data points where the line movement has been negligible or very small, so may miss some useful info.

Could you run the analysis for.

1. Games that have moved more than 2pts.

2. Games that have move through/off key numbers.

3. Games where the lines show RLM, not sure if this is possible to get the data points for.

I'd be happy to run if I could get the raw data.

Thanks

That would take me a while.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
509
Tokens
If you followed the ratings and played the teams that had the higher rating 4-0

Uh but you went 1-2 (33%) with your actual picks, Continuing your below-40% winning percentage at The RX. OBVIOUSLY YOU RATED THE TEAMS HIGHER WHO WERE FAVORED YOU FUCKING MORON. YET WITH ACTUAL PICKS YOU HAD YET ANOTHER LOSING WEEK. AGAIN. STOP TRYING TO RE-START YOUR RECORD FOR THE 876,298th TIME, CLOWN

You have the worst winning % in the history of the site, which is why every single poster talks shit about you, loser. Surprised you haven't killed yoursel since this forum is your life, yet no one likes you LMAOOOO keep losing every bet. Takes a real skill, while you get 40 viewers a week

Aw did I hurt da whittle baby? How about winning a bet? You are the biggest joke the RX had ever seen
 

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
3,584
Tokens
Hey catsoverunders.....take your bullshit somewhere else and go handicap some more teasers because you are junk with sides....2-3-1=33% vegas insider reject. Matt Zylbert is back at the Rx with a new username. Must have gotten fired because your dumb 1,000 word essay write ups with every play you made got a little boring. What name are you going to use next dumb ass
 

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
3,584
Tokens
uh but you went 1-2 (33%) with your actual picks, continuing your below-40% winning percentage at the rx. obviously you rated the teams higher who were favored you fucking moron. Yet with actual picks you had yet another losing week. Again. Stop trying to re-start your record for the 876,298th time, clown

you have the worst winning % in the history of the site, which is why every single poster talks shit about you, loser. Surprised you haven't killed yoursel since this forum is your life, yet no one likes you lmaoooo keep losing every bet. Takes a real skill, while you get 40 viewers a week

aw did i hurt da whittle baby? How about winning a bet? You are the biggest joke the rx had ever seen

You are the typical tout gone bad CATSOVERU NDERS aka MATT ZYLBERT. Welcome back to the rx bottom feeder low life. Take your cockwasher somewhere else.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,803
Messages
13,573,308
Members
100,871
Latest member
Legend813
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com