So far I have said Sterling was a racist, saying the comment "for every 1 good black guy there are 10 that will cut you" is racist, and Willie's comment was racist. Not sure where you are getting "everything" is racist, lol. You have no clue what you are talking about, just looking to argue.
I even call him out for it and he defends it acting all pompous like he usually does...
Akp
Lol, by "working class", Willie means white! That's where he is getting his 88% and 72% figures. And you wonder why republicans don't appeal to minorities or women!!
Willie Obama has brought racial tensions to a recent high, it's what he wants, it's what he needed to succeed
and it worked, but I'll never respect that
and when I used the expression "non inner city vote", what on earth do you think I was referencing? you think you made some revelation?
I wouldn't go telling people it in public, thats for sure.
maybe he just misinterpeted the data I dunno. Even if Willie was racist, he probably wouldn't be so outward with it to just say the white vote is the working class vote. I think he was just trying to make the point Obama dominated the inner-city/minorities and just said it wrong. Maybe sour grapes at the time...
Saying a candidate won the working class vote by 20pts when infact he won the vote of whites by 20pts would be racist. Or just a total lack of understanding who does/doesn't work in America because you live in the woods, a hut or something of that nature.
maybe he just misinterpeted the data I dunno. Even if Willie was racist, he probably wouldn't be so outward with it to just say the white vote is the working class vote. I think he was just trying to make the point Obama dominated the inner-city/minorities and just said it wrong. Maybe sour grapes at the time...
Saying a candidate won the working class vote by 20pts when infact he won the vote of whites by 20pts would be racist. Or just a total lack of understanding who does/doesn't work in America because you live in the woods, a hut or something of that nature.
This was part of an ongoing conversation I was having with him. He knew and I knew exactly what he was implying. There is no question about that. He was all upset that people were making fun of him about his election predictions so he started blaming it on minorities. There is absolutely 100% no doubt that he was implying the white vote was the working class vote and being his pompous arrogant ass blaming it all on minorities (who apparently do not work). Funny thing is quantity wise there are millions more whites that don't work than blacks.
Because he is a racist, lol. All I'm saying is your comment that I say "everything" is racist is ridiculous. I have mentioned 3 incidences of racist comments. You are the one that denies everything including one of the more racist comments I've ever heard. Just because you have experiences does not mean your opinion is not racist. I've never been cut by a black guy so if I say black guys don't commit crimes because I've never seen it, doesn't mean they don't commit crimes, lol. You have a weird sense of logic.
This is one of the funnier lines I've seen in my time at the RX.
The Sterling and this thread combine for more than 31 pages and 99% of those 31 pages are of you arguing with every poster at the RX except for Vit and Shub. 31 pages of you arguing, calling people names and claiming you're the greatest person on the face of the earth.
Talk about someone wanting to argue...geesh.
Both of you are argumentative blowhards who just want to read yourself type for hours on end. This is pretty much consensus opinion on here.
However in this instance Akphi is right. If someone is saying working class but just using the statistics of the white demographic in regards to 72%, 88% and 20% margin then yes that would either be racist or just some type of misinterpretation of data. It isn't factually correct and is just making grossly demeaning assumptions.
However in this instance Akphi is right. If someone is saying working class but just using the statistics of the white demographic in regards to 72%, 88% and 20% margin then yes that would either be racist or just some type of misinterpretation of data. It isn't factually correct and is just making grossly demeaning assumptions.
