Yes,
Schiano, Bradley deny witnessing, suspecting Sandusky abuse http://www.thescore.com/news/1058642
Greg Schiano, who served as an assistant coach at Penn State in the early 1990s, denies he was ever aware of Jerry Sandusky's child molestation.
"I never saw any abuse, nor had reason to suspect any abuse, during my time at Penn State," Schiano said Tuesday, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter.
Related: Paterno told of Sandusky abuse in 1976, testimony in unsealed docs shows
Schiano, who is now the defensive coordinator at Ohio State, and current UCLA defensive coordinator Tom Bradley were alleged to have been aware of Sandusy's abuse in documents unsealed by a Pennsylvania court earlier Tuesday.
In a statement put out Tuesday afternoon by his representative, Bradley also denied having any knowledge of Sandusky's abuse:
At no time did Tom Bradley ever witness any inappropriate behavior. Nor did he have any knowledge of alleged incidents in the '80s and '90s. He has consistently testified as such. Any assertions to the contrary are false. When he became aware of the 2001 incident it had already been reported to the University administration years earlier.
Former Penn State assistant Mike McQueary testified In a deposition from an insurance case in 2015 that Bradley told him Schiano said he witnessed Sandusky touching a boy in the shower, saying: "I can't remember if it was one night or one morning, but that Greg had come into his office white as a ghost and said that he just saw Jerry doing something to a boy in the shower. And that's it. That's all he ever told me."
not only is it old news, Joe reported it to the authorities, he did what he's supposed to do
the police have always said Joe was forthcoming in these instances and throughout their investigations
while they charged many university officials with crimes, including perjury (yes, it really is a crime but I digress), they never charged JoePa in any way shape or form
now old news that's been addressed many times in the past resurfaces and it's reported as if this stuff is all new
the media and their low standards is very disturbing, they're a big part of what's wrong with this country
IMHO, JoePa's biggest problem was that he was naive with respect to the behavior of a good friend of his, I don't think he had any idea how deeply rooted Sandusky's diabolical behavior was
and I'm no PSU fan either, I never convict on media reports and innuendo, I just can't
Person # 1: Jerry is being investigated for allegations of child abuse
JoePa: what are the results of that police investigation
Person # 1: the police are not charging Jerry with any crimes
JoePa: thank god, that's good news
some people interpret the above set of circumstances as proof JoePa was involved in some sort of cover-up
others think he may have believed the police did their job and found no wrong doing
based on what people closest to him say about his character, and there are so many character witnesses, I tend to believe the later
JoePa: what are the results of that police investigation
Person # 1: the police are not charging Jerry with any crimes
JoePa: thank god, that's good news
some people interpret the above set of circumstances as proof JoePa was involved in some sort of cover-up
others think he may have believed the police did their job and found no wrong doing
based on what people closest to him say about his character, and there are so many character witnesses, I tend to believe the later
