UCLA / TENN
<TABLE class=data cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2><TBODY><TR><TD class=datahl2>09/06/97</TD><TD class=datacell>TENN 30 - UCLA 24</TD><TD class=datacell>UCLA 14.5</TD><TD class=datacell></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>09/07/96</TD><TD class=datacell>UCLA 20 - TENN 35</TD><TD class=datacell>UCLA 18.5</TD><TD class=datacell></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD></TR><TR><TD class=datahl2>09/03/94</TD><TD class=datacell>TENN 23 - UCLA 25</TD><TD class=datacell>UCLA PK</TD><TD class=datacell></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD><TD class=datacell align=right></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
UCLA is 3-0 ATS in the last 3 meetings. People favor the VOLS in this situation.quote]
Not sure it is a relevant statistic dating back 14 years. Not disrespecting your system but a more current head-to-head would be plausible. Still believe UCLA can be respectable especially with Neuhesiel as coach and more so with Fulmer coaching Tenn.
Good luck with your continued plays....
It's the best I could bring up... I didn't even realize the dates. If you can think of teams that are similar quality to TN I can try to bring those up and see how those went.
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>08-31-2008 10:43 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5719961" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Leatherballs</TD><TD class=alt2>Good info. you have here JET....I think i am going to be on the opposite side of you tom. I still have a night of sleep to think about it though
BOL
About the SEC. The only stats I could pull up for UCLA vs SEC was:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=left width="12%">09/01/2001</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap width="25%">at Alabama</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="8%">20-17</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
It was a PK so they won SU and ATS. There might be more games but I don't know where to find them lol. As far as TN playing PAC-10:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=left width="12%">09/01/2007</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap width="25%">at California</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="8%">31-45</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="8%">L </TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="8%">(L ATS)</TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="8%"></TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="10%"></TD><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="10%"><TD class=TSN5 noWrap align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=left width="12%">09/02/2006</TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap width="25%">vs. California</TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="8%">35-18</TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="8%">W </TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="8%">(W ATS)</TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="8%"></TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="10%"></TD><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="10%"><TD class=TSN1 noWrap align=middle width="10%"> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
High scoring affairs. I also found some recent news:
University of Tennessee defensive back Brent Vinson and defensive tackle Donald Langley have been suspended for the team's first game of the season.
The school's head coach, Phillip Fulmer, announced that Vinson and Langley will miss the season opener at UCLA on September 1 because of an academic- related issue.The players will, however, be eligible for the Volunteers' game against University of Alabama-Birmingham on September 13. Vinson, a sophomore, played in 14 games (10 starts) last season and was second on the team with eight passes defended. Langley redshirted last season.
Word on the street is that OLSON (BRUINS QB) is also out... which I think may be good news if anything. It's also eye-catching and superstitious that TENN likes to score about 30PPG in the stats I've listed.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Ova looks like another solid one!!!!
changing my fresno pick to Rutgers perhaps because they have at least some defense and i think too too many on Fresno for them to cover?? what do you say ?
pissed just a tad that i didnt wager today, would have been 2-0 with kentucky and game UNDER... ooooh well, fukkkkkkkkk
i guess there is just soo much football i can watch in a given weekend.... shooting hoops became more fun...
changing my fresno pick to Rutgers perhaps because they have at least some defense and i think too too many on Fresno for them to cover?? what do you say ?
pissed just a tad that i didnt wager today, would have been 2-0 with kentucky and game UNDER... ooooh well, fukkkkkkkkk
i guess there is just soo much football i can watch in a given weekend.... shooting hoops became more fun...
JetPlane,
Way too many thing here can control the tempo of the game. Crompton ism uch different than Ainge and Clausen seeing as he can set up and actuall get 5-15 if there has been an opening for a running lane. Crompton also brings to the table something else different, he LOVES to try and make plays. He can throw a deep ball so you can probably bring up that the Volunteers will have a better YPG.
Also, the defensive secondary for the Volunteers is incredible. I don't see the numbers that you are listing being anywhere close to relevant here against this poor UCLA offense. UCLA is on their third (3rd) QB and I just don't see how you could play the seven here. I don't speak up much against your plays but this one seems to be a play on UTK or nothing at all my man.
UT's defense will be improved and well... UCLA is not a very strong offense team so I can defintely see these numbers of 401 being off of teams to the likes of Florida and not UCLA.
Whats the response for the O-Line and Foster? Can they contain Foster and the five big hogs upfront with just seven or eight?
Mr. Jet, great day yesterday!! Talked to a buddy of mine in Bham who convinced me that Alabama was in better physical shape than Clemson.Jumped on Bama! Today I love Rutgers, everyone in many forums are on Fresno St. The line has moved tremendously! Fresno IS STILL IN JET LAG!!!! Rutgers to the bank!! ATLSLIM
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 10:47 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5726628" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>6er</TD><TD class=alt2>
ope:
larger play winner
:thumbsup2:
YOU KNOWWWWWWWWW!!!! WHO GOT EM? WHO!?
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 02:38 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5722305" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>ATLSLIM</TD><TD class=alt2>Mr. Jet, great day yesterday!! Talked to a buddy of mine in Bham who convinced me that Alabama was in better physical shape than Clemson.Jumped on Bama! Today I love Rutgers, everyone in many forums are on Fresno St. The line has moved tremendously! Fresno IS STILL IN JET LAG!!!! Rutgers to the bank!! ATLSLIM
Maybe you should start convincing ME! All you guys with good info holding out on me lol. Goodluck captain.... see you on the plus side.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 02:15 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5722184" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Cappin' Guru</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
JetPlane,
Way too many thing here can control the tempo of the game. Crompton ism uch different than Ainge and Clausen seeing as he can set up and actuall get 5-15 if there has been an opening for a running lane. Crompton also brings to the table something else different, he LOVES to try and make plays. He can throw a deep ball so you can probably bring up that the Volunteers will have a better YPG.
Also, the defensive secondary for the Volunteers is incredible. I don't see the numbers that you are listing being anywhere close to relevant here against this poor UCLA offense. UCLA is on their third (3rd) QB and I just don't see how you could play the seven here. I don't speak up much against your plays but this one seems to be a play on UTK or nothing at all my man.
UT's defense will be improved and well... UCLA is not a very strong offense team so I can defintely see these numbers of 401 being off of teams to the likes of Florida and not UCLA.
Whats the response for the O-Line and Foster? Can they contain Foster and the five big hogs upfront with just seven or eight?
It's alright. I like the insight you gave me... I had already taken in consideration of the TN OFF/DEF and UCLA DEF. The only thing I really had no clue about was the OFFENSE. I gauged the DEF kinda of close... and the game was a clencher but too many times have I been on the bad side of the fence. I'm glad I picked the right ones today.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 12:56 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5721726" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Mighty Ginseng</TD><TD class=alt2>With you on that over Jet. Hope It's 50-0 Ten
ope:
Easy on the 50-0! >
I had the Bruines too ya know.... GET EM!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
ope:larger play winner
:thumbsup2:
YOU KNOWWWWWWWWW!!!! WHO GOT EM? WHO!?
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 02:38 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5722305" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>ATLSLIM</TD><TD class=alt2>Mr. Jet, great day yesterday!! Talked to a buddy of mine in Bham who convinced me that Alabama was in better physical shape than Clemson.Jumped on Bama! Today I love Rutgers, everyone in many forums are on Fresno St. The line has moved tremendously! Fresno IS STILL IN JET LAG!!!! Rutgers to the bank!! ATLSLIM
Maybe you should start convincing ME! All you guys with good info holding out on me lol. Goodluck captain.... see you on the plus side.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 02:15 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5722184" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Cappin' Guru</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
JetPlane,
Way too many thing here can control the tempo of the game. Crompton ism uch different than Ainge and Clausen seeing as he can set up and actuall get 5-15 if there has been an opening for a running lane. Crompton also brings to the table something else different, he LOVES to try and make plays. He can throw a deep ball so you can probably bring up that the Volunteers will have a better YPG.
Also, the defensive secondary for the Volunteers is incredible. I don't see the numbers that you are listing being anywhere close to relevant here against this poor UCLA offense. UCLA is on their third (3rd) QB and I just don't see how you could play the seven here. I don't speak up much against your plays but this one seems to be a play on UTK or nothing at all my man.
UT's defense will be improved and well... UCLA is not a very strong offense team so I can defintely see these numbers of 401 being off of teams to the likes of Florida and not UCLA.
Whats the response for the O-Line and Foster? Can they contain Foster and the five big hogs upfront with just seven or eight?
It's alright. I like the insight you gave me... I had already taken in consideration of the TN OFF/DEF and UCLA DEF. The only thing I really had no clue about was the OFFENSE. I gauged the DEF kinda of close... and the game was a clencher but too many times have I been on the bad side of the fence. I'm glad I picked the right ones today.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-01-2008 12:56 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5721726" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Mighty Ginseng</TD><TD class=alt2>With you on that over Jet. Hope It's 50-0 Ten
ope: Easy on the 50-0! >
I had the Bruines too ya know.... GET EM!</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
NONE OF THESE ARE OFFICIAL YET
I have a shit ton of plays once again. If you want to be ballsy do AKRON and AIR FORCE ML PARLAY for small. I will make a final list when I'm ready to actually wager on them. Any opinions are welcome. I do need your help when it comes to PLAYERS, I'm capping by team... and I have not (for the most part) taken into consideration players that have left the team or new ones joining. Strength of plays can go up or down depending on new info that I get and cap.
SMALL PLAYS:
TEXAS A&M -3
I predicted the A&M loss ATS (not SU) last week and I'm predicting a win today but I'm not making a statement with it because if these guys truly suck this bad then I'm not gonna want to bet on them ever again.
KENT ST +7
Playing my Iowa State Cyclones who had a good showing last week but this game should be a good test. I like taking points here.
NORMAL PLAYS (1 UNIT):
WVU -8.5
I have WVU winning by 12 this week... nothing special.
KANSAS -20.5
Kansas just barely missed a cover and this week it looks to be the same situation BUT I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt... it just feels right this week as opposed to last week.
TOLEDO +23
Haven't gotten to see a TOLEDO game yet... AZ coming off that 70pt win which was never suspected. I have TOL losing by 10 here. If they lose by an additional 14--I'm gonna be pissed. Losing by 21 is fine, which is why I'm making this a normal play instead of medium.
MEDIUM PLAYS (2-3 UNITS):
AIR FORCE +3
Gonna win.
AKRON +4.5
Gonna win.
BUFFALO +13
Buffalo could potentially upset but I have them losing by 4 points (not no god damn 13!). Gonna win.
I have a shit ton of plays once again. If you want to be ballsy do AKRON and AIR FORCE ML PARLAY for small. I will make a final list when I'm ready to actually wager on them. Any opinions are welcome. I do need your help when it comes to PLAYERS, I'm capping by team... and I have not (for the most part) taken into consideration players that have left the team or new ones joining. Strength of plays can go up or down depending on new info that I get and cap.
SMALL PLAYS:
TEXAS A&M -3
I predicted the A&M loss ATS (not SU) last week and I'm predicting a win today but I'm not making a statement with it because if these guys truly suck this bad then I'm not gonna want to bet on them ever again.
KENT ST +7
Playing my Iowa State Cyclones who had a good showing last week but this game should be a good test. I like taking points here.
NORMAL PLAYS (1 UNIT):
WVU -8.5
I have WVU winning by 12 this week... nothing special.
KANSAS -20.5
Kansas just barely missed a cover and this week it looks to be the same situation BUT I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt... it just feels right this week as opposed to last week.
TOLEDO +23
Haven't gotten to see a TOLEDO game yet... AZ coming off that 70pt win which was never suspected. I have TOL losing by 10 here. If they lose by an additional 14--I'm gonna be pissed. Losing by 21 is fine, which is why I'm making this a normal play instead of medium.
MEDIUM PLAYS (2-3 UNITS):
AIR FORCE +3
Gonna win.
AKRON +4.5
Gonna win.
BUFFALO +13
Buffalo could potentially upset but I have them losing by 4 points (not no god damn 13!). Gonna win.
Last edited:
