Italy Terrible Value

Search

Rx. Senior
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,744
Tokens
The books always knew they were in a Straight Jacket with this Game and no choice but to chalk the Crybabies up skinnier than usual. What they didnt bank on was the Public's complete lack of interest in Ukraine, stemming possibly from an opening 4-0 loss still fresh in their minds. Football's a Funny Game and so are Punters, once logged in no price is good enough so The Books had to push their price out even more.

On paper this Game is Italy's but its not played on Paper and while The Crybabies are without doubt the better side, these Two Teams have gone in opposite ways mentally over the last Two Weeks. Ukraine's campaign is already deemed a success and there's nothing but positives going forward. They have nothing to lose, will be relaxed and have a belief in their play. Italy on the otherhand has had nothing but negative things happen in the Fortnight. From sending offs, injuries, poor performances and Team shuffling to off pitch problems hanging over them like a sword of Damacles. Now not only do they meet another Banana skin but one with Shevchenko written on it. He may not be playing well in this tournament but nobody knows more than the Italians what He's capable of and Psychologically they may over compensate.

Regardless of all this, at this point in the Competition it would be stupidity to underrate anyone, and that being the case, the prices on Italy are scandalous. :toast:
 

Winning isn't everything ... it's the ONLY THING !
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
2,816
Tokens
Yo Winnie

Who's
crow.gif

now???

Ya ol' Wankah'. :missingte
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
86,920
Tokens
to bad they didn't have a -2.5 line

:smoking:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,100
Tokens
I find it interesting that the Italians have been labeled crybabies. I have watched most of the games and everybody seems to do alot of whinning. Unforunately with the way the officiating has been the players do have alot of reasons to complain. Just a thought maybe they need more referees out there. Always been amazed by having one official on the field. Correct me but only the on field referee can determine fouls??????
 

RX Spaniard
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
1,161
Tokens
the assistants can call fouls on the sides anytime, but the main ref has to agree with the call. If the main ref is in a bad position and the assistant calls a foul, he will always call it then, but if he saw nothing he might let the play go on, but i have only seen that happen once or twice in my life. They dont like to disagree with their assistants. Also assists usually only call offsides, they let fouls be called by the main ref, although they should call them, they wait for the main ref to call it from far away, and then swing the flag in the same direction, as if agreeing, or as if they were going to call it as well. Its so fucked up...
 

RX Spaniard
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
1,161
Tokens
you can almost murder in front of an assistant, he will look at the main ref and carry on running along the line if the main ref didnt see it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,843
Messages
13,560,275
Members
100,691
Latest member
ybb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com