They're down to their last 20 million. Better run!
http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=100090022&f=988094022&m=22410219
http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=100090022&f=988094022&m=22410219
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bulldog77:
How could any book be in trouble when underdogs went 4-0 this weekend? I have lost there recently so I only have a few hundred there but if WWTS goes under that's it for me for off-shore for all time. They are as solid as they come.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bulldog thats exactly how I feel if books like this go under thats it for me to...I have never heard anything but WWTS being solid
How could any book be in trouble when underdogs went 4-0 this weekend? I have lost there recently so I only have a few hundred there but if WWTS goes under that's it for me for off-shore for all time. They are as solid as they come.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bulldog thats exactly how I feel if books like this go under thats it for me to...I have never heard anything but WWTS being solid
acw,
I think you are right! How often does WWTS with a large clientelle offer that?? I feel they need the funds too! 20 million or 30 million,lol, is it true did anyone see this actually happen, see any bank statements,lol! Bottom line is how does one prove a sportsbook owes you money?? Have a mod here verify it,lol!Anyway I think there is something going on with WWTS, maybe not to a closing point but found that promotion from a very reputable shop at this time of year as needing cash, or why else would a strong shop offer a bonus like that! TWO REASONS, NEED CLIENTS OR NEED CASH!!
I think you are right! How often does WWTS with a large clientelle offer that?? I feel they need the funds too! 20 million or 30 million,lol, is it true did anyone see this actually happen, see any bank statements,lol! Bottom line is how does one prove a sportsbook owes you money?? Have a mod here verify it,lol!Anyway I think there is something going on with WWTS, maybe not to a closing point but found that promotion from a very reputable shop at this time of year as needing cash, or why else would a strong shop offer a bonus like that! TWO REASONS, NEED CLIENTS OR NEED CASH!!
I'm going to continue to play there but lets wait and see what happens, maybe just another scammer trying to hurt a books reputation! Fish who were the people who tried to hurt WWTS's reputation last year?? I think it was someone from OHIO if I remember correctly?? It sucks that ANYONE can say anything they want bout any Sportbook on these forums and get away with it! I guess its called FREEDOM OF SPEECH! Which smaller shops fall under the WWTS umbrella??
What is their relationship with Neteller? I don't think it's a simple one like ANY other book. (Has to do with security questions when asking for a payout. Neteller told me the questios were "generated" from them. However, it was written by WWTS to me, with no mention of Neteller needing to know.
I know that I'll get a lot of flack for saying it-but very very strange.
I know that I'll get a lot of flack for saying it-but very very strange.
What I don't get is the assumption that employees are forced to stick up for advertisers. Is it really true? I mean I sure haven't had a single directive to do this in what I write. If you don't believe me ask Ken if he has ever said I should give an ounce of better regard to an advertiser. I just happen to think that most of the advertisers here are among the best in the business and for that reason get the benefit of the doubt from most people regardless of their status here. And I would have to guess Mods are in the same boat as me.
I believe 100% in the fact that Ken would be the first to say something here if he got good VERIFIABLE information that any book, no matter their status here, was in trouble or doing something detrimental to the industry. I think Ken's actions regarding Royal back this up completely.
I believe 100% in the fact that Ken would be the first to say something here if he got good VERIFIABLE information that any book, no matter their status here, was in trouble or doing something detrimental to the industry. I think Ken's actions regarding Royal back this up completely.
