:lolBIG: Thanks BBlight.... I think some of them are still living in moms basement & out of touch reality if they have ever been able to experience that or even know what reality is.
Of course, I notice the usual array of moonbat lockstep party line hacks are posting against you, so you might just have something there.
Nobody has disputed that McCain doesn't want to make it an issue (yet). The question is why that is so. And the explanation that he doesn't make it an issue because his campaign knows that the assertions are not true seems much more likely than that he doesn't make use of it because it would "embarrass" him.
Let's see, there are basically two runners for president. It is complete conjecture to assume that if one of them were, for technical reasons, to get knocked out of the race the other one would most likely win?
And you call me a simpleton? Really, I find your style of argueing most entertaining, but perhaps not the way you intend it.
Obama not qualified for presidency lawsuit, Philip J Berg, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, September 10, 2008, SEEKS DEPOSITION OF BARACK OBAMA AND HOWARD DEAN BY END OF MONTH, Jeff Schreiber explains
September 10, 2008<!-- by citizenwells --> · 87 Comments
We received the following from Philip J Berg last night and posted it this morning:
“Hi Mr. Wells,
If Senator Obama is unable to prove his citizenship, which we feel he is unable to do, he will not be able to serve as president. In a case such as this, if this is learned before the presidential election, then according to the National Chairperson of the Democratic National Committe will confer with the Democratic leadership of the United States Congress and the Democratic Governors Association, whom will report to the Democratic National Committee which is authorized to fill the vacancy, the names of the candidate picks.
If Senator Obama were to be elected as President, he would be removed and the Vice President would take the President’s position.
If Senator Obama is indicted prior to taking his oath, I believe, and of course this would be a first, but I believe it would still go to Biden.
Just to update you a bit, I just filed a Motion for Expedited Discovery, Extensive Discovery, Deposition of Senator Obama and Howard Dean, Chairman of the DNC. This may get things moving a bit.
In addition, Senator Obama and the DNC must have their Answer to the complaint filed by September 24, 2008. The FEC has until October 21, 2008. http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2...dean-by-end-of-month-jeff-schreiber-explains/
September 10, 2008<!-- by citizenwells --> · 87 Comments
We received the following from Philip J Berg last night and posted it this morning:
“Hi Mr. Wells,
If Senator Obama is unable to prove his citizenship, which we feel he is unable to do, he will not be able to serve as president. In a case such as this, if this is learned before the presidential election, then according to the National Chairperson of the Democratic National Committe will confer with the Democratic leadership of the United States Congress and the Democratic Governors Association, whom will report to the Democratic National Committee which is authorized to fill the vacancy, the names of the candidate picks.
If Senator Obama were to be elected as President, he would be removed and the Vice President would take the President’s position.
If Senator Obama is indicted prior to taking his oath, I believe, and of course this would be a first, but I believe it would still go to Biden.
Just to update you a bit, I just filed a Motion for Expedited Discovery, Extensive Discovery, Deposition of Senator Obama and Howard Dean, Chairman of the DNC. This may get things moving a bit.
In addition, Senator Obama and the DNC must have their Answer to the complaint filed by September 24, 2008. The FEC has until October 21, 2008. http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2...dean-by-end-of-month-jeff-schreiber-explains/
Let's see, there are basically two runners for president. It is complete conjecture to assume that if one of them were, for technical reasons, to get knocked out of the race the other one would most likely win?
And you call me a simpleton? Really, I find your style of argueing most entertaining, but perhaps not the way you intend it.
One day you’ll re-read your replies to me in this thread and do this
hno: Today is not that day.
One day you’ll re-read your replies to me in this thread and do this
Today is not that day.
Everyone who reads this thread, most likely even those on your side, can read this thread and see that you're getting your ass kicked by Preussen. You have no answer, so you dance around like a fool.
No, he is not. He was born at the (then U.S.-controlled) Panama canal zone to two American parents (his father served there as a naval officer), automatically making him a U.S. citizen. So he never was a foreigner, hence he can't be an immigrant, can he.
What bilbal obviously means is the academic legal question whether an American citizen born outside the U.S. is a "natural born citizen", which is a requirement for being President. But from all I know it is highly unlikely that a court would hold that someone born to American parents on an American military base in a U.S. controlled territory is not a natural born citizen. The risk here is definitely not high enough to stop McCain from showing that Obama is not a U.S. citizen at all if he or his campaign believed this to be the case.
