Iran mocks "low-IQ" Obama, says his military option is the joke of the year! (The whole world is LAUGHING at the mom jeans "community organizer")

[akphidelt]

Of course it isn't.

You don't know what those words mean. You just type them.

I know exactly what they mean, that's why I type them.

 

[akphidelt]

Really? Name one right wing position I have ever stated on this board? All I said was Obama shouldn't have threatened Putin with "costs". I never said I wanted to send troops because I don't.

You seem very one sided in your posts. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand what you are doing.

 

[Acebb]

Thank you.

I think he should type "LOL" again.

It adds credibility and stuff!

 

[Acebb]

I know exactly what they mean, that's why I type them.

Well considering there was no "logical fallacy" no you don't.

 

[akphidelt]

Well considering there was no "logical fallacy" no you don't.

This is what you said... it's as clear of a logical fallacy as there is, lol. But you don't know what that means, so I understand your confusion.

Since Obama's ideas, to the extent he even has any beyond sound bites, are spectacularly wrong, why shouldn't I want him to fail?

For example:

August 30, 2005​

DONETSK, Ukraine – U.S. Senators Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Barack Obama (D-IL) called for the immediate destruction of 15,000 tons of ammunition, 400,000 small arms and light weapons, and 1,000 man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) or shoulder missile launchers that are often sought by terrorists.

Lugar and Obama toured the Donetsk State Chemical Production Plant, a conventional weapons destruction facility where the U.S. has taken the lead in a three-year NATO program to destroy the weapons. Another 117,000 tons of ammunition and 1.1 million small arms and light weapons are slated for destruction within 12 years.

====
How does that look now?

"The right side of history!!!"

LMFAO

 

[SheriffJoe]

jon gabriel @exjon
Follow
"If you listen closely, you can hear laughing all the way from the Kremlin." http://shar.es/FLfgH
1:13 PM - 4 Mar 2014

 

[MantisToboggan]

You seem very one sided in your posts. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand what you are doing.

Ah, yes. I forgot the rule that if you disagree with President Obama on one issue then you must be a "wing nut". Not sure how that slipped my mind.

 

[Acebb]

Really? Name one right wing position I have ever stated on this board? All I said was Obama shouldn't have threatened Putin with "costs". I never said I wanted to send troops because I don't.

Keep in mind you are responding to a little kiddie troll.

 

[akphidelt]

Ah, yes. I forgot the rule that if you disagree with President Obama on one issue then you must be a "wing nut". Not sure how that slipped my mind.

You disagree with everything he says on every issue. You even use Putin as an example of having the upper hand. It's not that difficult to understand you are a nutter.

 

[Acebb]

This is what you said... it's as clear of a logical fallacy as there is, lol.

No it isn't.

LOL

You can't read

LOL

 

[akphidelt]

Keep in mind you are responding to a little kiddie troll.

I understand in your mind someone you calls you out for your lies would be considered a troll. Not surprised.

 

[akphidelt]

No it isn't.

LOL

You can't read

LOL

I can read very well. And yes it is.

 

[MantisToboggan]

You disagree with everything he says on every issue. You even use Putin as an example of having the upper hand. It's not that difficult to understand you are a nutter.

More bullshit. Every issue? This is the first one. My point was Putin got the upper hand when Obama said there would be costs because there won't. If you can't see that, I'm sorry.

 

[Acebb]

I understand in your mind someone you calls you out for your lies would be considered a troll. Not surprised.

Except you aren't calling out any "lies" as there are no lies

You're just rambling

 

[Acebb]

I can read very well. And yes it is.

No you can't which is why you're idiotically saying I engaged in some "fallacy"

You don't know what that would actually mean.

 

[akphidelt]

Except you aren't calling out any "lies" as there are no lies

You're just rambling

I've called out all your lies. It gets old.

 

[Acebb]

I agree. Why should I care about Ukraine? Half the people there are Russian and want closer ties to Russia.

That's right!

"International Law" only matters when Republicans are in office.

 

[Acebb]

I've called out all your lies. It gets old.

I bet you have!

Totally!

Idiot

 

[akphidelt]

No you can't which is why you're idiotically saying I engaged in some "fallacy"

You don't know what that would actually mean.

I know exactly what it means and you did engage in a fallacy.

 

[Acebb]

I know exactly what it means and you did engage in a fallacy.

Hilarious.

I bet!

You proved it, clown!

Knockout and stuff!!!!