Iran could be the culprit in latest violence>>

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Iran declares war on U.S.
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 5th 2004 | Joseph Farah



Nobody else is saying it, so, once again, it is left to me to explain what really happened in Iraq yesterday.

Iran declared war on the U.S.

The signs have been there for a long time. I don't know if they have been intentionally ignored by U.S. forces in Iraq, or whether there is some master plan at the Defense Department to deal with this scenario.

All I can tell you is we are now fighting a regional war. Our local opposition in Iraq is being trained, armed and directed with foreign support – by neighboring Iran.

The uprising yesterday was treated in many initial news accounts as a spontaneous uprising directed by Najaf cleric Moktada al-Sadr.

What the other news accounts left out was one significant, but well-established fact: Al-Sadr works for Iran. He is an Iranian agent. His authority comes from Iran.

Last April, an Iranian cleric, Kadhem al-Husseini al-Haeri, issued a religious edict and distributed to Shiite mullahs in Iraq, calling on them "to seize the first possible opportunity to fill the power vacuum in the administration of Iraqi cities."

The edict, or fatwa, issued April 8, 2003, showed that Shiite clerics in Iraq are receiving significant direction from Iran. The edict said that Shiite leaders have to "seize as many positions as possible to impose a fait accompli for any coming government."

"People have to be taught not to collapse morally before the means used by the Great Satan if it stays in Iraq," the fatwa read. "It will try to spread moral decay, incite lust by allowing easy access to stimulating satellite channels and spread debauchery to weaken people's faith."

The fatwa also instructed the cleric's followers to "raise people's awareness of the Great Satan's plans and of the means to abort them."

On April 7, the day American troops effectively toppled Hussein's government by seizing its main seats of power in Baghdad, al-Haeri sent a handwritten letter to the city of Najaf, appointing Moktada al-Sadr as his deputy in Iraq.

Haeri wrote: "We hereby inform you that Mr. Moktada al-Sadr is our deputy and representative in all fatwa affairs."

It added: "His position is my position."

Also last April, WorldNetDaily reported that Iran had armed and trained some 40,000 Shiite Iraqi fighters – most former prisoners of war captured during the Iran-Iraq war – and sent them to Iraq to foment an Islamic revolution. The report originated in my premium, online, intelligence newsletter G2 Bulletin.

The report said this small army represents the vanguard of Iran's effort to subvert the U.S.-led liberation of Iraq and use the toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime for its own ends.

"Ayatollah Mohammed Bakir Khakim is on record pledging more than once to his followers a plan to impose Islamic rule over Iraq with the help of Iran," reports G2 Bulletin. "The Tehran ayatollahs, or the Pasadran, the powerful revolutionary guard, repeatedly have been telling the Iraqis they would be their legitimate allies and partners. In such a scenario, there is no room for the U.S. The coalition that liberated Iraq is seen by the Iraqi Shiite militants and their Iranian sponsors as a tool for handing Iraq over to them without the need to use a massive force of their own."

Iran has clear objectives in Iraq. The only question is whether the United States still has clear objectives in Iraq – and whether Washington recognizes that this war front just got wider.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
They should be publicly thanking the US for this unique opportunity to expand the Islamic government system.

It just wouldn't have been possible under Saddam.

The strategic genius Bush, our great leader, has it all under control.
The impression that Iraq is a complete and utter ballsup is just a cunning ruse to lull the bad guys into a false sense of security.

Invading Iran would be a stroke of pure genius, it would come as a complete surprise attack.
No-one would expect ANYONE to do something as crazy and fxxked up as that.

You could call it operation-crazy-mother-fxxker.

[This message was edited by eek on April 05, 2004 at 01:30 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
345
Tokens
Remember that Iran is part of the so called Axis of Evil and they have an extremely religous government. It might pay off for the US to invade since Iran is most likely extremely rich in oil. I hope that WWIII doesn't erupt from all of this muck.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
I think the betting terminology would be...

"chasing your losses and going for broke."
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by A2345exxx:
The last thing your country needs is another war!!!!!!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Amen

But, there is no good answer right now.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,214
Messages
13,565,509
Members
100,767
Latest member
mccollochsrv
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com