No proof and like dandy says they will not even tell him where the money was transferred to. They cannot prove that the other player requested a WU payout. There was no clear cut evidence and they acted afraid to do a 3way call with him, so that he could ask questions. Their ability to present solid understanding tapes was a failure.
I am so frustrated by this.
I am so frustrated by this.
like was said earlier appears to be he said she said thing going on. Never a happy ending when thats the situation.
i still stand by my statment that the book is probably in the right not givinhg out additional player info. For sure the very 1st thing you would do is try to send $$ back to yourself or at least place bets from that account. They got egg on their face once why would you even expect them to expose themselves a second time.
sorry to hear they are not willing to work with you. good luck
i still stand by my statment that the book is probably in the right not givinhg out additional player info. For sure the very 1st thing you would do is try to send $$ back to yourself or at least place bets from that account. They got egg on their face once why would you even expect them to expose themselves a second time.
sorry to hear they are not willing to work with you. good luck
Maybe the Rx can get their good pals at Don Best to look into this. Instant Action Sports are a Don Best screen book, and this seems like a very un-screen-like situation.
Tough call at this point to say who is lying. Dandy and a buddy could certainly have pulled off a scam, but just as easily, IAS could be the ones doing the screwing.
The thing that makes me think that maybe IAS isn't purposely screwing the guy, is that $4K is a relatively tiny amount of money in the overall scheme of things, and I doubt they'd purposely be trying to screw the guy unless he really did something to piss them off.
That leaves a couple of other more likely options:
1. Dandy and buddy are trying to pull a fast one, or
2. Someone else got ahold of Dandy's account info, and requested a payout to another state (which, if true, IAS should probably have never sent without double-checking with Dandy first to see if it was kosher).
Tough call at this point to say who is lying. Dandy and a buddy could certainly have pulled off a scam, but just as easily, IAS could be the ones doing the screwing.
The thing that makes me think that maybe IAS isn't purposely screwing the guy, is that $4K is a relatively tiny amount of money in the overall scheme of things, and I doubt they'd purposely be trying to screw the guy unless he really did something to piss them off.
That leaves a couple of other more likely options:
1. Dandy and buddy are trying to pull a fast one, or
2. Someone else got ahold of Dandy's account info, and requested a payout to another state (which, if true, IAS should probably have never sent without double-checking with Dandy first to see if it was kosher).
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by The General:
Keep in mind Dandy has a whole seperate issue than does the other player with the WU issue. 2 seperate accounts and 2 different problems.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You're right General. My mistake. Two similar situations at the same time - very interesting.
The most disturbing thing in Dandy's situation (now that I reread it
), is that they won't tell him what buddy's account the money was supposedly transferred to. There should be no privacy issue here, because if Dandy did indeed transfer the money to a buddy's account, he must have known who the buddy was ... so why doesn't IAS just tell him who it was supposedly transferred to.
Keep in mind Dandy has a whole seperate issue than does the other player with the WU issue. 2 seperate accounts and 2 different problems.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You're right General. My mistake. Two similar situations at the same time - very interesting.
The most disturbing thing in Dandy's situation (now that I reread it
WHAT PLAYER PRIVACY?? Account 904 took money from MY account with the help of IAsports.
He has no right to privacy anymore.
To those of you who think I am trying to pull a fast one here. Only the general can verify who I am, and that my reputation in the sportsbetting world is second to none. I can provide proof for everything I say.
He has no right to privacy anymore.
To those of you who think I am trying to pull a fast one here. Only the general can verify who I am, and that my reputation in the sportsbetting world is second to none. I can provide proof for everything I say.
There is no way IAS can justify what they did to Dandy. Clearly he can prove that the account belongs to him. And therefore there is no justification for IAS's unwillingness to tell him where they sent his money.
Otherwise what is stopping me from maing all sorts of neteller withdrawal requests from IAS accounts that don't belong to me. If IAs pays me, I know they will protect my privacy by not telling the cusotmer I stole from who I am.
Seems like they have been in slow pay for a long time, and now rather than admit to ebing in no pay, they've decided to simply resort to thievery
Otherwise what is stopping me from maing all sorts of neteller withdrawal requests from IAS accounts that don't belong to me. If IAs pays me, I know they will protect my privacy by not telling the cusotmer I stole from who I am.
Seems like they have been in slow pay for a long time, and now rather than admit to ebing in no pay, they've decided to simply resort to thievery
General, an interesting tidbit that you may have overlooked, is that Dandy says his account number is 903, and that the money was taken out of his account and put into Account 904. What the significance of this is, I don't know, but it's more than a coincidence. Did a buddy of Dandy's set up an account right after he did to attempt a scam ? Did IAS put the money into the wrong account because it was one number off (903/904) ? Did IAS just pull this account number (904) out of thin air ?
Any feedback from Don Best about IAS, seeing as they're on the screen ?
[This message was edited by Halifax on July 02, 2004 at 04:57 PM.]
Any feedback from Don Best about IAS, seeing as they're on the screen ?
[This message was edited by Halifax on July 02, 2004 at 04:57 PM.]
Even if the whole thing was a scam, there is no explanation as why IAS refuses to tell Dandy who they gave the money too.
What I'm wondering is if maybe IAS screwed up, and withdrew money from Dandy's account when they should have withdrawn it from the other account. Then the other player sees that he got the money but his account balance remained the same. SO then he quickly withdraws his money again. And rather than acknowledge the screw up, IAS make Dandy pay for their mistake
What I'm wondering is if maybe IAS screwed up, and withdrew money from Dandy's account when they should have withdrawn it from the other account. Then the other player sees that he got the money but his account balance remained the same. SO then he quickly withdraws his money again. And rather than acknowledge the screw up, IAS make Dandy pay for their mistake
