Anyone having Royal as an advertiser right now should be ashamed of themselves and just in it for the money and not protecting the player. I think this happened before across the street and it cost the poor player but not the pocketbooks of the principals.
Kenny is a man of Honor and Integrity. He looks out for the player a tough job but he does it best on the net!!!!
Good Luck
Kenny is a man of Honor and Integrity. He looks out for the player a tough job but he does it best on the net!!!!
Good Luck
Umm. I don't know. Why was Hamneggs' debacle such a big deal? Why did Ken delete that BMs Forum post he made? Why did SG have multiple Neteller accounts? At least Hammy admitted his scam. Of course it did get him banned. Why hasn't Mr. morals and integrity Pat McIrish spoken up regarding this situation? Where is Fishhead and what does Gambler's Freedom feel about this?
I believe these are all far more relevant questions than yours RPM.
I believe these are all far more relevant questions than yours RPM.
I'm with RPM. This SG stuff is boring me to tears and I've read only 1% of it. The real story is Royal slow paying. If Royal becomes an Aces-type story, then SG will be on the backburner and we'll bemoan the fact that didn't talk about it to death because we were too busy lynching SG. Perhaps we've lost perspective.
I guess they are more relevant than your question:
"why this sickgambler thing is such a big deal?"
I guess that if I were you my concern would be why you have a thief and liar (potentially) traipsing around your forum and nobody with any responsibility seems to care?
As I recall, Hamneggs was slammed every which way but loose and then booted. SG's offense are far more serious than anything Hamneggs was up to but there seems to be a very laissez-faire attitude among the RX cognescenti.
That would concern me far more than what goes on across the street.
Perception is everything and the perception I get is that the RX doesn't care about a serious case of player fraud in this instance, which would be unfortunate.
"why this sickgambler thing is such a big deal?"
I guess that if I were you my concern would be why you have a thief and liar (potentially) traipsing around your forum and nobody with any responsibility seems to care?
As I recall, Hamneggs was slammed every which way but loose and then booted. SG's offense are far more serious than anything Hamneggs was up to but there seems to be a very laissez-faire attitude among the RX cognescenti.
That would concern me far more than what goes on across the street.
Perception is everything and the perception I get is that the RX doesn't care about a serious case of player fraud in this instance, which would be unfortunate.
MJULIAN
"Perception is everything and the perception I get is that the RX doesn't care about a serious case of player fraud in this instance, which would be unfortunate."
we care, and as such, we are having a "court case" to hear both sides of the story. he will be sentenced if found guilty.
NOW, why is it none of you mw regulars are asking major why he is leaving royal on his site?
if nothing else, answer this one question....
IT IS COMMON KNOWELEGE THAT ROYAL IS IN TROUBLE, WOULD YOU RECOMMEND ROYAL TO A FRIEND RIGHT NOW?
"Perception is everything and the perception I get is that the RX doesn't care about a serious case of player fraud in this instance, which would be unfortunate."
we care, and as such, we are having a "court case" to hear both sides of the story. he will be sentenced if found guilty.
NOW, why is it none of you mw regulars are asking major why he is leaving royal on his site?
if nothing else, answer this one question....
IT IS COMMON KNOWELEGE THAT ROYAL IS IN TROUBLE, WOULD YOU RECOMMEND ROYAL TO A FRIEND RIGHT NOW?
RPM, I'm pretty sure that the player was swapping emails with Russ & Ken since Friday.
p.s. I have asked about Royal still being up on MW-and they are still there for a reason.
It's easy to pull them down when things look potentially "iffy", but much tougher to keep them up. I guess that time will tell.
p.s. I have asked about Royal still being up on MW-and they are still there for a reason.
It's easy to pull them down when things look potentially "iffy", but much tougher to keep them up. I guess that time will tell.
RPM, the reason is that they are still up is because there hasn't been any REAL reason to take them down.
As far as I'm concerned, this wasn't even a slow pay. 48 hours over the weekend during a run on the bank.....I could live with that.
This player got spooked--probably due to all the "doom & gloom" hype here.
Where did you see that Russ "didn't know about this" yesterday?
p.s. I probably wouldn't send anyone there right now-but I'm overly anal about these things...
As far as I'm concerned, this wasn't even a slow pay. 48 hours over the weekend during a run on the bank.....I could live with that.
This player got spooked--probably due to all the "doom & gloom" hype here.
Where did you see that Russ "didn't know about this" yesterday?
p.s. I probably wouldn't send anyone there right now-but I'm overly anal about these things...
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mjulian:
Umm. I don't know. Why was Hamneggs' debacle such a big deal? Why did Ken delete that BMs Forum post he made? Why did SG have multiple Neteller accounts? At least Hammy admitted his scam. Of course it did get him banned. Why hasn't Mr. morals and integrity Pat McIrish spoken up regarding this situation? Where is Fishhead and what does Gambler's Freedom feel about this?
I believe these are all far more relevant questions than yours RPM.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What is it you want from me? Hammy spent days smearing a sportsbook at several sites in order to get them to pay him. It turned out he made the whole thing up after all those posts and 50 e-mails to me. It hurt a lot of people and was nothing but a scam from the start. I haven't followed the Sick Gambler thing but I see he says he is innocent. Hammy after getting caught red-handed and losing out on his attempt to extort money was banned, yes. He even admitted he was guilty. Geez man you think he was being picked on unfairly?
I am surprised by the tone of this. I never have seen this from you before, I certainly never refer to you this way. If you are trying to goad me into something because your boss still has Royal up don't inlcude me in it please. Each site makes his own decisions, I haven't told anyone what to do at their site. Yes I would pull them if it was my call but can't blame someone for taking the easy money either. I don't think I'm Mr Morals nor do I think I have more integrity than anyone else. I just speak my mind and move on to the next item on the agenda.
Good day.
Umm. I don't know. Why was Hamneggs' debacle such a big deal? Why did Ken delete that BMs Forum post he made? Why did SG have multiple Neteller accounts? At least Hammy admitted his scam. Of course it did get him banned. Why hasn't Mr. morals and integrity Pat McIrish spoken up regarding this situation? Where is Fishhead and what does Gambler's Freedom feel about this?
I believe these are all far more relevant questions than yours RPM.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What is it you want from me? Hammy spent days smearing a sportsbook at several sites in order to get them to pay him. It turned out he made the whole thing up after all those posts and 50 e-mails to me. It hurt a lot of people and was nothing but a scam from the start. I haven't followed the Sick Gambler thing but I see he says he is innocent. Hammy after getting caught red-handed and losing out on his attempt to extort money was banned, yes. He even admitted he was guilty. Geez man you think he was being picked on unfairly?
I am surprised by the tone of this. I never have seen this from you before, I certainly never refer to you this way. If you are trying to goad me into something because your boss still has Royal up don't inlcude me in it please. Each site makes his own decisions, I haven't told anyone what to do at their site. Yes I would pull them if it was my call but can't blame someone for taking the easy money either. I don't think I'm Mr Morals nor do I think I have more integrity than anyone else. I just speak my mind and move on to the next item on the agenda.
Good day.
TTIN,
IN THIS THREAD...
http://www.majorwager.com/fusetalk/messageview.cfm?catid=22&threadid=64107
MAJOR ASKS STRUT FOR INFO ABOUT THE GUY THAT HAD THE PROBLEM WITH ROYAL
it is pretty obvious that he has NO IDEA what is going on.
how do you know the player contacted major?
also, if you wouldnt send someone to royal, dont you agree that someone like major shouldnt either?
it all goes back to one thing...
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR NOT TAKING ROYAL DOWN???
IN THIS THREAD...
http://www.majorwager.com/fusetalk/messageview.cfm?catid=22&threadid=64107
MAJOR ASKS STRUT FOR INFO ABOUT THE GUY THAT HAD THE PROBLEM WITH ROYAL
it is pretty obvious that he has NO IDEA what is going on.
how do you know the player contacted major?
also, if you wouldnt send someone to royal, dont you agree that someone like major shouldnt either?
it all goes back to one thing...
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR NOT TAKING ROYAL DOWN???
RPM, I'm sure Russ has much better info about Royal's situation than I. Where I'd refer people really doesn't mean shit.
I've seen emails between the player & Russ from Friday up until he was paid. This player got spooked & did the RIGHT thing by talking to Ken & Russ in private-but I don't think that either of their interventions had anything to do with the payout. There's a post at Peeps that explains what their apparent problem was this week (but I haven't yet confirmed).
There is big $$$ behind this book, and people are still being paid.
Does this have more to do with Royal supposedly going down(as it appears that you wish to happen so that you can say "told you so"-aka Camelot style) or Ken's shareholder buddy????
I've seen emails between the player & Russ from Friday up until he was paid. This player got spooked & did the RIGHT thing by talking to Ken & Russ in private-but I don't think that either of their interventions had anything to do with the payout. There's a post at Peeps that explains what their apparent problem was this week (but I haven't yet confirmed).
There is big $$$ behind this book, and people are still being paid.
Does this have more to do with Royal supposedly going down(as it appears that you wish to happen so that you can say "told you so"-aka Camelot style) or Ken's shareholder buddy????
