I'm beginning to think the Repubs are gonna try a bloodless coup on Rump

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
he better come with something. Since he released the last set of emails....she's increased her lead over Trump.

Yes, I was tempted to point out that annoying little detail, but figured, what's the point? He's a delusional moron.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Clinton is unbeatable with this kind of support

37093C9100000578-3731326-image-a-4_1470753892415.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Clinton did a great job throwing Iranian nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri, under the bus.


0A724DEC000005DC-0-image-a-34_1470568767126.jpg



Nice email server job Hillary.


More blood on Hillarys hands.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Reason not to vote for the coughing laughing clit


HILLARY CLINTON’S LIE TO VOTERS ABOUT JOB CREATION WILL HAUNT HER CAMPAIGN

Clinton’s 2000 Promise To Create 200,000 New Jobs In Upstate New York Was An Unequivocal Failure, With Jobs Remaining Stagnant And Manufacturing Cratering
Clinton Promised To Create 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York When Running For Senate In 2000:
Clinton Promised To Create 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York When She Campaigned For Senator In 2000. “She's reminded of it all the time around here, so Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton couldn't have been surprised when her failed 2000 campaign promise to bring 200,000 jobs to economically desperate upstate New York became part of the latest presidential debate.” (Carolyn Thompson, “Fact Check: Clinton And Jobs Promised,” USA Today, 2/28/08)
Clinton Ran TV Ads “Just Before The Election” Touting Her 200,000 New Upstate Jobs Goal. “A day after announcing her 2000 candidacy, then-first lady Clinton vowed to infuse more than a half billion dollars into the upstate economy. A television ad ran just before the election, citing the 200,000 new jobs goal.” (Jerry Markon, “As senator, Clinton Promised 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York. Her Efforts Fell Flat.,” The Washington Post, 8/7/16)
The Washington Post Headline: “As Senator, Clinton Promised 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York. Her Efforts Fell Flat.” (The Washington Post, 8/7/16)
Clinton Massively Underperformed This Goal, With Job Growth In Upstate New York Remaining Stagnant And Manufacturing Cratering:
The Public Policy Institute In Albany, Which Uses U.S. BLS Data, Reported That Upstate New York “Lost More Than 31,000 Payroll Jobs Between October 2001 And December 2006.” “The most authoritative jobs numbers are widely considered to be those from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Multiple analyses of its New York data show that upstate actually lost jobs during Clinton’s first term. For example, the non-partisan Public Policy Institute in Albany — which uses BLS data for a monthly snapshot of Upstate New York — reported that the region lost more than 31,000 payroll jobs between October 2001 and December 2006.” (Jerry Markon, “As senator, Clinton Promised 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York. Her Efforts Fell Flat.,” The Washington Post, 8/7/16)
“During Her Overall Senate Tenure, According To The Institute, Upstate Jobs Rose 0.2 Percent Overall.” “During her overall Senate tenure, according to the institute, upstate jobs rose 0.2 percent overall, but manufacturing jobs fell 24.1 percent.” (Jerry Markon, “As senator, Clinton Promised 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York. Her Efforts Fell Flat.,” The Washington Post, 8/7/16)
Manufacturing Jobs In Upstate New York Fell By “Nearly 25 Percent During Clinton’s Time In The Senate. “But nearly eight years after Clinton’s Senate exit, there is little evidence that her economic development programs had a substantial impact on upstate employment. Despite Clinton’s efforts, upstate job growth stagnated overall during her tenure, with manufacturing jobs plunging nearly 25 percent, according to jobs data.” (Jerry Markon, “As senator, Clinton Promised 200,000 Jobs In Upstate New York. Her Efforts Fell Flat.,” The Washington Post, 8/7/16)
While Failing To Uphold Her Promise To Her Constituents, Clinton Was In India Claiming The Outsourcing Of American Jobs Was "An Inevitability":
In Remarks From A 2005 Closed Door Presentation In India, Clinton Declared That Outsourcing Is "An Inevitability There Is No Way To Legislate Against Reality… Outsourcing Will Continue." CLINTON: "Perhaps some economic incentives to at least think very hard before those decisions are made, but you know it is an inevitability there is no way to legislate against reality, so I think that uh, the outsourcing will continue." (Hillary Clinton, Remarks At India Today Conclave, New Delhi, India, 2/25/05)

Clinton Blamed 9-11 And President Bush For Not Reaching Her 200,000 Jobs Goal For Upstate New York:
In April Clinton Was Grilled For Promising 200,000 New Jobs For Upstate New York During Her Time As A New York Senator, Blaming 9-11 And President Bush For Not Reaching Jobs Goal. REPORTER: "Again, you see particularly 'upstaters' recalling your time in the U.S. Senate and also recalling your pledge for the 200,000 jobs, right? And I know I've seen your comments since then, that you were overzealous or exuberant perhaps and your hope was that there would be a Democratic White House, which was not achieved. You're not making such pledges now, but do you think that you could boost job growth in upstate New York if you were in fact in the White House?" CLINTON: "I sure do. You know, three things happened; we had 9/11, which was devastating for the entire state, we did have The Great Recession and Republican policies, and we had a very difficult situation with the Bush administration not enforcing trade agreements." (Hillary Clinton, Interview With Capitol Tonight, 4/4/16)



Are you on fucking drugs????? The topic is the apparently fast increasing movement by REPUBLICANS to get rid of Rump, and your reaction is to repeat yourself endlessly in posting things that you think are gonna convince people who frequent this forum to not vote for HRC? Do you have to shit all over every fucking thread? Isn't it about time to give us another breathless update(that virtually nobody comments on) on Britain's "war?" We have to endure 3 more months of your brainless race to 50,000 posts before you get it shoved up your ass, you fucking racist, nosy ass no voting cocksucker.:Countdownkth)(&^:madassholLoser!@#0:madassholSlapping-silly90))azzkick(&^
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
I understand that. But you are crushing any discussion of the opening topic. It would be best to open another thread if you want to post campaign literature of such length.

What HE said...
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
It’s a real shame Kasich lost.

You're a one trick pony, Dave. Kind of funny considering....

So you’re all grown up all of a sudden? Congratulations. Give yourself a pat on the back. Took you long enough. It’s a start but beating one stance to death falls into the category of redundancy.


Hopefully as time goes on you’ll find another issue to champion. I’d say I’m proud of you but I’m not.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
No. I was hoping for the type of discussion I had with Vit and Scott. Might be above your pay grade.
Seriously? There is never a discussion in the Poli forum. All threads turn to shit sooner or later. You’re just pissed SB stole the show before any liberal had a chance.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
Seriously? There is never a discussion in the Poli forum. All threads turn to shit sooner or later. You’re just pissed SB stole the show before any liberal had a chance.

Disagree. It's infrequent but there is discussion. You just choose not to participate. Scott and Vit shared their responses and it didn't turn into a shit show at all.

You're just pissed that Speaker RINO is about to smash Nehlen.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Disagree. It's infrequent but there is discussion. You just choose not to participate. Scott and Vit shared their responses and it didn't turn into a shit show at all.

You're just pissed that Speaker RINO is about to smash Nehlen.
If Ryan wins I’ll be disappointed. I don’t get pissed about anything I have no control over. And why would I participate? It would be redundant. SB said it all.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
In the words of the late, great, Yogi Berra, it's getting late early: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...ing-out-of-the-race-probably-too-late-already

[FONT=&quot][FONT=&quot] RSS[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]REBLOGGED BY

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]TAGS



[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Share this article[/FONT]

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?ur...g+out+of+the+race?+Probably+too+late+already.


[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]A lot of talk over the past week has been about the possibility of the GOP’s pet creation, Trump, pulling out of the race (or being forced out). In some states, it might already be too late to change.
From Ballotpedia, I give you some dates required by some states by which the parties must certify their candidates for office. Here are the ones that have already passed:
STATEDEADLINE
MICHIGANJULY 22
DELAWAREJULY 26
NORTH CAROLINA*AUGUST 5
WEST VIRGINIAAUGUST 5

CANDIDATE CERTIFICATION DEADLINES, AUG. 7 OR BEFORE

* Not a statutory deadline, but North Carolina requests that candidates be submitted by the first Friday in August.
Ponder that list for a moment.
And now for the deadlines that occur in the next two weeks (by Friday, August 19th). In order to meet these deadlines, the RNC would have to come up with a candidate in the next 12 days — a problematic occurrence at best.
STATEDEADLINE
SOUTH DAKOTAAUGUST 9
OHIOAUGUST 10
MISSOURIAUGUST 16
IOWAAUGUST 19
LOUISIANAAUGUST 19

CANDIDATE CERTIFICATION DEADLINES, AUG. 8-19

Imagine a path to victory for a candidate that didn’t show up on the ballot in 8 or 9 states, especially a battleground state like Ohio.
Finally, these are the states that require candidates to be submitted by the end of August (Wednesday, August 31 — 24 days left, not counting today, of course):
STATEDEADLINE
MISSISSIPPIAUGUST 20
NORTH DAKOTAAUGUST 20
MONTANAAUGUST 24
VIRGINIAAUGUST 26
MINNESOTAAUGUST 29
NEVADAAUGUST 30
OREGONAUGUST 30
TEXASAUGUST 30
UTAHAUGUST 31

CANDIDATE CERTIFICATION DEADLINES, AUG 20-31

Finally, just to add to the pressure, I’ll note that Alaska and Idaho have September 1deadlines. Florida has a September 1 deadline, but the statute only applies to Presidential electors, not to the candidates themselves.
There are many states where the deadlines are unclear, so potential exists for a lot of confusion.
So, 17 states by the end of the month, 19 if you add in September 1st deadlines (I’m not counting North Carolina in my math there, since North Carolina’s isn’t a hard statutory deadline).
Make of this what you will.
EDIT/UPDATE: First of all, thanks for the recs to get this on the Rec List! I’m honored!
Second, the idea has come up repeatedly in the comments that these dates are irrelevant because state legislatures could just change the statutes. True, but consider…
Only a handful of state legislatures are in session right now, so to accomplish that statute change will require calling the legislatures into special session. States with a non-GOP controlled legislatures are unlikely to manage this, nor those with a Democratic governor. Finally, even for those that would decide to do this there is the question of bad optics. So, the GOP has it’s months-long nominating process, 15 or so candidates, and makes it selection. And now weeks later states would have to call special sessions and spend taxpayer money to change deadlines for submission of candidates in order to allow for selection of a new candidate because the selected candidate is so incompetent or distasteful the party leadership can’t allow him to run? I’m sure HRC’s campaign would have a field day with the optics there

[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Seriously? There is never a discussion in the Poli forum. All threads turn to shit sooner or later. You’re just pissed SB stole the show before any liberal had a chance.

Later beats sooner.
Why don't you start posting picks? :):)
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Disagree. It's infrequent but there is discussion. You just choose not to participate. Scott and Vit shared their responses and it didn't turn into a shit show at all.

You're just pissed that Speaker RINO is about to smash Nehlen.


Vit's response sucked. I just didn't want to tell him that.
Hey Vit!
images
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,196
Members
100,878
Latest member
lisasdanceandexercise
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com