I did not see Moore-ons fakumentory,does anyone recall this in the movie?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:52 a.m. EDT
9/11 Commission: U.S. Terror War has Stymied al Qaida

The Sept. 11 Commission has found that the Bush administration's war on terror has severely impaired al Qaida's ability to organize another spectacular attack against the U.S. homeland by capturing or killing the deadly terror group's key leaders, drying up their financial resources and "severely limiting their ability to strategize, plan attacks, and dispatch operatives worldwide."

The bombshell finding, buried at the end of the Commission's Staff Statement No. 15, should have been hailed in the press as evidence that we've at least turned the corner in the war on terror - and may indeed have the enemy on the run. Instead, reporters have ignored this particular Commission finding since its release on June 16.

Story Continues Below



Here's the part of Staff Statement 15 that the press decided Americans didn't need to hear about, as reported by the Commission under the heading "Al Qaeda* Today."
"Since the September 11 attacks and the defeat of the Taliban, as Qaeda's funding has decreased significantly. The arrests or deaths of several important financial facilitators have decreased the amount of money al Qaeda has raised and increased the costs and difficulty of raising and moving that money.

"Some entirely corrupt charities are now out of business, with many of their principals killed or captured, although some charities may still be providing support to al Qaeda.

"Moreover, it appears that the al Qaeda attacks within Saudi Arabia in May and November 2003 have reduced - perhaps drastically - at Qaeda's ability to raise funds from Saudi sources. Both an increase in Saudi enforcement and a more negative perception of al Qaeda by potential donors have cut its income." [END OF EXCERPT]

And the good news for America - not to mention the Bush administration - doesn't end there. In the same section, Staff Statement 15 notes:

"Prior to 9/11, al Qaeda was a centralized organization which used Afghanistan as a war room to strategize, plan attacks, and dispatch operatives worldwide." But now, says the Commission, "Bin Ladin's* seclusion [has] forced operational commanders and cell leaders to assume greater authority; they are now making the command decisions previously made by him." [END OF EXCERPT]

In other words, whether dead or alive, the prime mover behind the Sept. 11 attacks has been taken out of commission, with operational authority handed over to allies of convenience like Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

And while Zarqawi has mounted dozens of operations throughout the Middle East in recent months, including a deadly chem-bomb plot foiled by Jordanian authorities in April, his focus these days seems to be pretty much on Iraq - not America.

Even there, Zarqawi seems to be feeling the heat lately. According to the recent communique he sent to bin Laden, published on Islamic web sites earlier this month, he complained about being "squeezed" by U.S. forces.

"The space of movement is starting to get smaller," he told the 9/11 chief. "The [U.S.] grip is starting to be tightened on the holy warriors' necks and, with the spread of soldiers and police, the future [for our side] is becoming frightening."

To be sure, the 9/11 Commission did not attribute any success in the terror war to the president by name, though as its leader and chief strategist, that conclusion is inescapable.

And neither does Staff Statement 15 say that al Qaeda has been completely vanquished, warning instead that the bin Laden network is still able to execute smaller operations and is "striving to attack the U.S. and inflict mass casualties" - using nuclear weapons if possible.


Still, when the 9/11 Commission reports: "Al Qaeda today is more a loose collection of regional networks with a greatly weakened central organization," it's hard not to conclude President Bush's war on terror is making significant progress. Unless you're a journalist.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Moore did not attack Bush's war on terror, per se. He attacked the use of Bush's war on terror to justify the war on Iraqis.

The bulk of the stuff broken up according to your article, was via law enforcement procedures, something that the left advocates.

"And while Zarqawi has mounted dozens of operations throughout the Middle East in recent months, including a deadly chem-bomb plot foiled by Jordanian authorities in April, his focus these days seems to be pretty much on Iraq - not America."

Oh, well, then, give Bush a cookie. He's keeping the terrorists busy in Iraq where the dispensable ragheads live. Great guy, he is.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
6,480
Tokens
Moore also emphasised that the American people are being terrorised by security warnings and shifting levels of perceived threat.

I personally find this to be of greatest danger because the tactics are those that would be employed by a leader prior to becoming a dictator. In fact Moore has a clip of Bush saying that things would be easier for a dictator.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Tokens
Fahrenheit 9/11 exposes the Bush administration's for what it is, clueless.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
265
Tokens
So there should be no reason why Bush and co would scare people using Al Qaida into voting for them around election time, right?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
496
Tokens
Don't sweat it. The only guy that ever agrees with Patriot is Shotgun and vica versa and there's a fair bit of comfort in that.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,260
Messages
13,566,042
Members
100,782
Latest member
rikvipfans1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com