How do you feel about today's SCOTUS ruling FZ?

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
6,141
Tokens
Whatever your thoughts on the subject, the American College of Pedetricians can't be considered a credible source on anything. They represent roughly 1/10th of one percent of the Pedetricians and have widely been considered fanatical. Their tactics mirror the pro-gay propaganda machine to a tee and they continually shrowd their religious agenda behind the look and feel of a supposed medical group.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Whatever your thoughts on the subject, the American College of Pedetricians can't be considered a credible source on anything. They represent roughly 1/10th of one percent of the Pedetricians and have widely been considered fanatical. Their tactics mirror the pro-gay propaganda machine to a tee and they continually shrowd their religious agenda behind the look and feel of a supposed medical group.

Um, they are a medical group. Just because you don't agree with their agenda doesn't make their medical degrees and experience less valid. What a stupid thing to say.

The Executive Committee and Board of Directors

President: Michelle Cretella, MD, FCP
Vice President: Quentin Van Meter, MD, FCP
Secretary: R. Scott Spies, MD, FCP
Treasurer: Randolph Matthews, MD, FCP
Past-President: Den Trumbull, MD, FCP

Board of Directors

Jane Anderson, MD, FCP
Michael Artigues, MD, FCP
Tom Benton, MD, MPH, FCP
Jeff Brewster, MD, MBA, FCP
Scott Field, MD, FCP
Donald Hagler, MD, FCP
Rebecca Huizen, DO, FCP
Patricia Lee June, MD, FCP
Bill Shaw, MD, FCP
Nick Yates, MD, FCP

Directors, Emeritus

Eugene Diamond, MD, FCP
 

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
6,141
Tokens
Um, they are a medical group. Just because you don't agree with their agenda doesn't make their medical degrees and experience less valid. What a stupid thing to say.

The Executive Committee and Board of Directors

President: Michelle Cretella, MD, FCP
Vice President: Quentin Van Meter, MD, FCP
Secretary: R. Scott Spies, MD, FCP
Treasurer: Randolph Matthews, MD, FCP
Past-President: Den Trumbull, MD, FCP

Board of Directors

Jane Anderson, MD, FCP
Michael Artigues, MD, FCP
Tom Benton, MD, MPH, FCP
Jeff Brewster, MD, MBA, FCP
Scott Field, MD, FCP
Donald Hagler, MD, FCP
Rebecca Huizen, DO, FCP
Patricia Lee June, MD, FCP
Bill Shaw, MD, FCP
Nick Yates, MD, FCP

Directors, Emeritus

Eugene Diamond, MD, FCP

I don't doubt their medical credentials, but the group was formed to push their religious agenda. Maybe their agenda is a just cause, but let's call a spade a spade. To act as if their basis on anything is medically driven versus religiously driven is act of willful ignorance.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
The world was populated by heterosexuals, not homosexuals, so how is homosexuality a natural thing?

Nature lives by certain rules itself.......

If youre saying a religious group is pushing an agenda, then you can say the same thing about the gay community is pushing their agenda down the community's throat.......sorry, but I don't see a difference.

We will see priests being fined or jailed for not marrying gay couples in the near future.......& I'm sure there will be immense public protests over the situation......this situation will only divide us more.

The media is definitely on the side of the politically correct......politically correct equals to not being able to speak your mind & going with the "system"
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,953
Tokens
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who would pervert the Constitution. Abe Lincoln
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Bullshit. Show me where on their website, you deduced that they were "Christian fundies" in 30 seconds.
Time to evolve zit. You're being a slave to some book written centuries ago that says a lot of dumb shit.

Do you really want your great grandchildren to be embarrassed on how their great grandfather thought?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Time to evolve zit. You're being a slave to some book written centuries ago that says a lot of dumb shit.

Do you really want your great grandchildren to be embarrassed on how their great grandfather thought?

Does this mean two men or two men will be able to conceive one day?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Time to evolve zit. You're being a slave to some book written centuries ago that says a lot of dumb shit.

Do you really want your great grandchildren to be embarrassed on how their great grandfather thought?



That Holy bible is believed by quite a few people.......it was written 2,000 years ago.

Back then, many kings have fallen by the waste side, not to be worshipped like Jesus has......& why is that? Why has Jesus withstood the test of time of us humans?

Because the truth is never forgotten.....now whether you yourself want to believe that is up to you. You don't have to teach your kids or grand kids Christianity, or any other religion.....

But as for evolving, like Enfuego mentioned above.....men can't have babies, so even if you want to ignore the religious aspect of it, you can't ignore what's natural. Women can't have babies w/o the male sperm, & men can't have babies period......then again, since science & technology is "evolving"......maybe one day a man will have a 10 pound baby out of his pee hole.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
That Holy bible is believed by quite a few people.......it was written 2,000 years ago.

Back then, many kings have fallen by the waste side, not to be worshipped like Jesus has......& why is that? Why has Jesus withstood the test of time of us humans?

Because the truth is never forgotten.....now whether you yourself want to believe that is up to you. You don't have to teach your kids or grand kids Christianity, or any other religion.....

But as for evolving, like Enfuego mentioned above.....men can't have babies, so even if you want to ignore the religious aspect of it, you can't ignore what's natural. Women can't have babies w/o the male sperm, & men can't have babies period......then again, since science & technology is "evolving"......maybe one day a man will have a 10 pound baby out of his pee hole.
You're joking about the bible right? You loons pick and choose what to follow. Most of it is plain nonsense.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
3,342
Tokens
The ruling affected 1.8% of the population...1.8%!! you can't tell me that is normal behavior. The way those bitches whine, you'd thing sucking cock is the norm and over 50% of the people do it(men, that is). I supported legal civil unions where full benefits are given to both people. I thought that solved the problem. Now, a bigger can of worms is opened up. Not long before polygamists can legally marry. How about the person who wants to marry their dog or cat? The farmer who wants to marry his sheep? No difference...love is love
 

Defender of the Faith
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
5,680
Tokens
The ruling affected 1.8% of the population...1.8%!! you can't tell me that is normal behavior. The way those bitches whine, you'd thing sucking cock is the norm and over 50% of the people do it(men, that is). I supported legal civil unions where full benefits are given to both people. I thought that solved the problem. Now, a bigger can of worms is opened up. Not long before polygamists can legally marry. How about the person who wants to marry their dog or cat? The farmer who wants to marry his sheep? No difference...love is love

Maybe the government never should have gotten involved in a religious institution in the first place?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
The ruling affected 1.8% of the population...1.8%!! you can't tell me that is normal behavior. The way those bitches whine, you'd thing sucking cock is the norm and over 50% of the people do it(men, that is). I supported legal civil unions where full benefits are given to both people. I thought that solved the problem. Now, a bigger can of worms is opened up. Not long before polygamists can legally marry. How about the person who wants to marry their dog or cat? The farmer who wants to marry his sheep? No difference...love is love




You have no idea what can of worms this has opened up.......let's bump this thread in 10 years, & see what came out of it.

I was gonna say let's see in 20 years, but it won't take that long to see how the rest of society suffers from this.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
3,556
Tokens
I'm not seeing the parallel of humans to animals. People that marry are consenting adults. Animals would not be.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
Run -- Hey, great name! We related?

lol


Animals not consenting to marriage? Why the fuck not?! They don't consent to be food yet we slice them up and cook them up for dinner.



If Elton John can now plow and marry a hairy anus, why can't Hillary Clinton marry her pet chihuahua and blow it's hairy anus? Love is love. You just got to respect diversity!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,922
Messages
13,575,244
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com