At the conclusion of last year's college basketball service, 90% of survey respondents rated their overall satisfaction with the service at Above Average (40.4%) or Excellent (49.6%). There was only one single respondent of in the entire subscriber base who who rated satisfaction at the lowest level (Poor) and that was in fact Joe!
I'm certainly am not accusing Joe of lying, but he did write that he met me in person at college basketball games in Southern California which absolutely never happened so it would not be too out of line to question his credibility.
More importantly I simply do not believe the results he is describing are typical. This again, is evidenced by other customer feedback, survey results, and retention. In fact it is not even possible to have worse results than what he describes, because line movement only affected the outcome of a finite number of games.
I am more than willing to admit that competitive line movement is an issue, and clear detailed warnings of this are listed on both websites.
Services are not for everyone. My services definitely are not for everyone. However, I would still argue that a lot more than 10% of the gambling public are not only willing to race for lines, or be inconvenienced by release times, but also anything else it takes to help increase their bottom line. If not than they are not serious about winning in the first place. If following a service that produces very high win rates requires more time and effort, than so be it. It sure beats the alternative.
Edward