I always look for your plays and you don't have one for the early one. I'm snowed in and was wondering if you have a opinion on O/U. I like the under in this one. I read earlier that you like Memphis as a opinion. The thing that scares me is I like the under and you like MEM. I usually side with the over if I like a Fav at a high spread and vise versa with a big dog. What you think.
my post wasn't referring to you at all. i had a few other people in mind with my post. i had no problem answering your question. kind of took offense to saying I would take people's write ups, but i guess i will take that as a compliment that my write ups are good?? i also don't consider myself the average Joe capping these games so maybe that has something to do with it? i guess i really didn't understand what you were asking? were you saying i was using someone else's plays? or looking at some random newspaper and taking the side that reporter had and using his write up?
:aktion033
i truly applaud you bro.. most people on here post and frankly i feel they hurt others bc they just post base on emotion no facts and can really screw ppl who decide to follow them.. it is nice to see somebody who cares and knows his sports, post.. what you are doing is really a great service to others.. i am in LOVE with sports and this is my first year really wagering on games.. i learned ALOT this year.. i am really getting into cbb and i want to learn more.. i have been followng games that ck has been posting (who has also been great) and i always take a look at all your threads.. i am going to be watching your threads more often and see what i can pick up.. i want to even start followng your picks as i do want to make this a SERIOUS "job" of mine.. im sure you post all your plays and i ask that you continue to do so bc it really helps ppl! so best of luck to you and thanks again for sharing bro.. btw funny thing i also know a few GOOD friends who went to cuse haha and a few who still do..
thanks again
Last edited:
Didn't mean Average bout you just was saying a normal person not a reporter. Their is no doubt to me that you cap these games and no i don't think you use someone else's pick's! The only thing i meant was you sounded like a reporter!It's cool man
a little misunderstanding that's all! :drink:3 Units
NC ST -1
Mark it down this will be one of the few times I will play a road favorite this year. I just can't pass what I feel is a great matchup. Although the Pack have a gaudy 7-1 record they have yet to play anyone. In fact their only loss was against the only team that was half decent, which was Davidson. This could be a game that exposes NC ST. Javier Gonzalez is questionable with a lacerated elbow, but I actually want him to play. Gonzo is just a horrific point guard and will get eaten alive by one of the best back courts in the country. It also doesn't help that I don't expect Courtney Fells, one of NC ST's leading scorers, and team leaders to be at 100%. He was upgraded to probable, but only played 6 minutes without scoring in their last game against Lipscomb. For anyone that played basketball and has even sprained an ankle let me tell you first hand they are an absolute bitch to play with, and I don't expect Fells to be able to give his best effort. While Marquette has veterans all over the place, and top shelf guards in James, McNeal, and Mathews the most imporant player tonight will be Lazar Haywood, who has become a force down low. If he can neutralize the front court, which is NC ST's strength with Brandon Costner, and Ben McCauley the Marquette guards should have their way with the Pack guards. In fact I like Hayward's game much more than Costner, and McCauley anyways. I think both are severely over rated, and should be taken out of the game by the Marquette quickness at guard. This Maquette team is much better than NCST, no matter how bad their coach is. They should expose NCST as a fraud tonight
NC ST -1
Mark it down this will be one of the few times I will play a road favorite this year. I just can't pass what I feel is a great matchup. Although the Pack have a gaudy 7-1 record they have yet to play anyone. In fact their only loss was against the only team that was half decent, which was Davidson. This could be a game that exposes NC ST. Javier Gonzalez is questionable with a lacerated elbow, but I actually want him to play. Gonzo is just a horrific point guard and will get eaten alive by one of the best back courts in the country. It also doesn't help that I don't expect Courtney Fells, one of NC ST's leading scorers, and team leaders to be at 100%. He was upgraded to probable, but only played 6 minutes without scoring in their last game against Lipscomb. For anyone that played basketball and has even sprained an ankle let me tell you first hand they are an absolute bitch to play with, and I don't expect Fells to be able to give his best effort. While Marquette has veterans all over the place, and top shelf guards in James, McNeal, and Mathews the most imporant player tonight will be Lazar Haywood, who has become a force down low. If he can neutralize the front court, which is NC ST's strength with Brandon Costner, and Ben McCauley the Marquette guards should have their way with the Pack guards. In fact I like Hayward's game much more than Costner, and McCauley anyways. I think both are severely over rated, and should be taken out of the game by the Marquette quickness at guard. This Maquette team is much better than NCST, no matter how bad their coach is. They should expose NCST as a fraud tonight
thanks bro I really appreciate the post. it just frustrates me when I lose because i do work hard at this. the reason I post is because I feel I can help people out, otherwise I wouldn't post. that is why I only post cbb, and mlb because those are the sports I have won for the most part year in and year out. shit i am a huge football and nba fan as well, and can post plays for that, but what would it be worth since i know that isn't my strength. the only thing that frustrates me is when i go 6-2, and people bitch about the 2 losses. anyway i am rambling.
gl
