I saw a lot of touts on the Cards and Mets last night, worked out OK for them. Its like anything, sometimes they will be right and sometimes they will be wrong. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the Mets winners of like 10 in a row with their Ace on the hill would be a decent bet laying -130 and that the Cards at home with their best pitcher are a decent bet at -110. I don't know why anyone would pay for crap like that. I agree though anytime the majority of people are on one side, touts or not, it loses more than it wins, which is why the books make crazy amounts of money over the long term. The whole theory about wanted balanced action and they just want the juice is crazy in my eyes. Sorry for going off topic.