$216 ticket:
Race 7 : 3,5,8
Race 8 : 1,3,6
Race 9 : 3,9,11
Race 10 : 3,4,6,7,8,101,,14 (If you can widdle this field down, you're better than me...I HATE 2 yo maidens)
.............................
Just a quick observation on your ticket if I may.
It just doesn't look like you took a stand in any race. There are at least 3 favorites in the 4 races and if you liked them enough to include all of them I assume you believed they could or would win. With that said, if they ALL did happen to make the grade, the ticket would have no value at all.
It could be a better idea to single 1 or 2 of those shorter price horses (if you have to include them at all) and then spread in the others. Play multiple tickets if need be. The whole idea is to get maximum value out of any ticket played where 2/1 to 5/1 is better played in a WP or Exacta imo.
BTW...You don't stink, just need a litte more work on the construction part.
People seem to think this is strickly a handicapping excersize rather than searching for value in the correct structure. Hope this helps in the future.
pj
<!-- / message -->
Race 7 : 3,5,8
Race 8 : 1,3,6
Race 9 : 3,9,11
Race 10 : 3,4,6,7,8,101,,14 (If you can widdle this field down, you're better than me...I HATE 2 yo maidens)
.............................
Just a quick observation on your ticket if I may.
It just doesn't look like you took a stand in any race. There are at least 3 favorites in the 4 races and if you liked them enough to include all of them I assume you believed they could or would win. With that said, if they ALL did happen to make the grade, the ticket would have no value at all.
It could be a better idea to single 1 or 2 of those shorter price horses (if you have to include them at all) and then spread in the others. Play multiple tickets if need be. The whole idea is to get maximum value out of any ticket played where 2/1 to 5/1 is better played in a WP or Exacta imo.
BTW...You don't stink, just need a litte more work on the construction part.
People seem to think this is strickly a handicapping excersize rather than searching for value in the correct structure. Hope this helps in the future.
pj
<!-- / message -->
