Hey Mega-Lo-Maniac

Search

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
From Capitol Hill Blue

Bush Leagues
Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides
By DOUG THOMPSON
Publisher, Capitol Hill Blue
Jun 4, 2004, 06:15

President George W. Bush¹s increasingly erratic behavior and wide mood
swings has the halls of the West Wing buzzing lately as aides privately
express growing concern over their leader¹s state of mind.

In meetings with top aides and administration officials, the President goes
from quoting the Bible in one breath to obscene tantrums against the media,
Democrats and others that he classifies as ³enemies of the state.²

Worried White House aides paint a portrait of a man on the edge,
increasingly wary of those who disagree with him and paranoid of a public
that no longer trusts his policies in Iraq or at home.

³It reminds me of the Nixon days,² says a longtime GOP political consultant
with contacts in the White House. ³Everybody is an enemy; everybody is out
to get him. That¹s the mood over there.²

In interviews with a number of White House staffers who were willing to talk
off the record, a picture of an administration under siege has emerged, led
by a man who declares his decisions to be ³God¹s will² and then tells aides
to ³**** over² anyone they consider to be an opponent of the administration.

³We¹re at war, there¹s no doubt about it. What I don¹t know anymore is just
who the enemy might be,² says one troubled White House aide. ³We seem to
spend more time trying to destroy John Kerry than al Qaeda and our enemies
list just keeps growing and growing.²

Aides say the President gets ³hung up on minor details,² micromanaging to
the extreme while ignoring the bigger picture. He will spend hours
personally reviewing and approving every attack ad against his Democratic
opponent and then kiss off a meeting on economic issues.

³This is what is killing us on Iraq,² one aide says. ³We lost focus. The
President got hung up on the weapons of mass destruction and an unproven
link to al Qaeda. We could have found other justifiable reasons for the war
but the President insisted the focus stay on those two, tenuous items.²

Aides who raise questions quickly find themselves shut out of access to the
President or other top advisors. Among top officials, Bush¹s inner circle is
shrinking. Secretary of State Colin Powell has fallen out of favor because
of his growing doubts about the administration¹s war against Iraq.

The President's abrupt dismissal of CIA Directory George Tenet Wednesday
night is, aides say, an example of how he works.

"Tenet wanted to quit last year but the President got his back up and
wouldn't hear of it," says an aide. "That would have been the opportune time
to make a change, not in the middle of an election campaign but when the
director challenged the President during the meeting Wednesday, the
President cut him off by saying 'that's it George. I cannot abide
disloyalty. I want your resignation and I want it now."

Tenet was allowed to resign "voluntarily" and Bush informed his shocked
staff of the decision Thursday morning. One aide says the President actually
described the decision as "God's will."

God may also be the reason Attorney General John Ashcroft, the
administration¹s lightning rod because of his questionable actions that
critics argue threatens freedoms granted by the Constitution, remains part
of the power elite. West Wing staffers call Bush and Ashcroft ³the Blues
Brothers² because ³they¹re on a mission from God.²

³The Attorney General is tight with the President because of religion,² says
one aide. ³They both believe any action is justifiable in the name of God.²

But the President who says he rules at the behest of God can also
tongue-lash those he perceives as disloyal, calling them ³****ing assholes²
in front of other staff, berating one cabinet official in front of others
and labeling anyone who disagrees with him ³unpatriotic² or ³anti-American.²

³The mood here is that we¹re under siege, there¹s no doubt about it,² says
one troubled aide who admits he is looking for work elsewhere. ³In this
administration, you don¹t have to wear a turban or speak Farsi to be an
enemy of the United States. All you have to do is disagree with the
President.²

The White House did not respond to requests for comment on the record.

© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Gotta tell you my take is that this sounds like a embellished story. If he is that paranoid then we all should kiss our asses goodbye.
Sure he could be the Anti-Christ, but I've settled for a spoiled brat, with limited intelligence, and strange preoccupation with death.

Go back to Texas jagoff, you are the enemy

_________________________
Sure could use a trim
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
Funny story unless it is true. Here's an earlier article by Doug Thompson in Capitol Hill Blue where he admits to being scammed by a source and vows to never use un-named sources again.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=19&num=2537


"No more unnamed sources
By DOUG THOMPSON
Jul 10, 2003, 11:51

Recently, this web site discovered it has been played as a sucker by a source that was used in seven stories that ran in Capitol Hill Blue from September 2002 until July of 2003.

The person in question was quoted as an unnamed source in six of the seven articles and by name (Terrance J. Wilkinson) in the seventh. We later learned the name was bogus even though I had known (or thought I knew) the person by that name for more than 20 years."

"Journalists have long depended on unnamed sources to break major stories. Without such sources, Watergate, Whitewater and the Monica Lewinsky story might never have come to light.

But we live in a different era now. Technology makes it easier for people to pull together enough information to create a story that sounds credible on the surface but still have hidden agendas underneath.

Many journalists have told me they cannot do their job without unnamed sources. I used to agree with them but events of this past week have caused me to rethink that philosophy.

A line has to be drawn somewhere. Somebody has to stand up and say "I'm not going to be used anymore." We're taking that stand. Effective immediately, Capitol Hill Blue will no longer publish stories that quote unnamed sources. When we do use sources for a story, they will be quoted by name, title and background. That background will be verified before the story is published.

In addition, we are reviewing every story we have run in the past involving unnamed sources and requiring the writers to go back and verify key pieces of information. If we find a problem, we will take any and all action necessary to correct the situation. We will also re-verify the backgrounds of named sources used in articles on sensitive issues.

Does this mean we will miss some major stories? Of course it does. But I'd rather miss a story or two than ever get taken for a ride again"
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,244
Messages
13,565,883
Members
100,774
Latest member
carlottakrajcik44
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com