GB +6 (1pt buy) Large

[Bad_Cat]

Of course you are winning hundreds of thousands of dollars with your bets but you are posting only losers on this forums. I totally believe you haha. What a piece of crap you are. lol

Like I said you have no idea how much money ive won or what my record is so you should probably shut your cockwasher and carry on with your 5 dollar bets

 

[Bad_Cat]

Man, it's seriously scary how a legitimate psychopath can just try to spin everything.

Says I was "fired", never happened. Says I only had "10 clients", obviously not true (the 10+ clients was in reference to the people I had signed up for Half-Season/Monthly packages when I departed briefly at the end of the '14 season, which run $500 and $300 a pop, respectively. Had plenty more Weekly and Daily sales, dummy). Says I lost clients money, which would be impossible with four out of five winning seasons (4 MLB, 1 NFL in total).

Then attempts to, for whatever reason, take a shot at my splendid NFL work this year even though I'm 31-16-2 (66%) with all my posted plays, and unlike Bad_Cat, actually keep track of publicly throughout this year. Maybe that's why I get around 10,000 viewers every week and am the most-tailed handicapper on the entire RX? Do you even think these idiotic statements out before you type them? Like, I seriously don't think you realize how retarded you sound.

The funniest part, however, is the bold part. He's basically historically bad with his posted plays, yet on "the bets he doesn't post," he's somehow made a lot of money. You realize -- out of the thousands and thousands of people who visit this great site -- there isn't one person who believes you. But I'll just leave it at that

Lol @ splendid. Your 3-3-1 on NFL sides is very splendid lol. Have any 10 dollar 3 team 10 point teasers for all your paid customers for this week coward?

 

[Bad_Cat]

Man, it's seriously scary how a legitimate psychopath can just try to spin everything.

Says I was "fired", never happened. Says I only had "10 clients", obviously not true (the 10+ clients was in reference to the people I had signed up for Half-Season/Monthly packages when I departed briefly at the end of the '14 season, which run $500 and $300 a pop, respectively. Had plenty more Weekly and Daily sales, dummy). Says I lost clients money, which would be impossible with four out of five winning seasons (4 MLB, 1 NFL in total).

Then attempts to, for whatever reason, take a shot at my splendid NFL work this year even though I'm 31-16-2 (66%) with all my posted plays, and unlike Bad_Cat, actually keep track of publicly throughout this year. Maybe that's why I get around 10,000 viewers every week and am the most-tailed handicapper on the entire RX? Do you even think these idiotic statements out before you type them? Like, I seriously don't think you realize how retarded you sound.

The funniest part, however, is the bold part. He's basically historically bad with his posted plays, yet on "the bets he doesn't post," he's somehow made a lot of money. You realize -- out of the thousands and thousands of people who visit this great site -- there isn't one person who believes you. But I'll just leave it at that

Coming from a fired tout who was proven to post false records and provide false lines. Lol. Your dumb ass doesn't even wager lol.

 

[Bad_Cat]

I`m 100% he`s delusional. He is asking me why I`m in this thread, yet he came here to insult Clemson1 "Yeah right? He's full of shit and he's in a fantasy world if thinks you can buy 1 point for 15 cents. That should tell you right there he's just throwing out numbers and hoping they stick". He`s pissed off because I proved him wrong that you can bet on Green Bay +6 ( -122, -125 ) and bookies allows you to buy 1 point for 15 cents. You are right about this guy, definitely a psychopath.

I don't talk to stupid kids, so carry on.

 

[Bad_Cat]

Hey Call_Me_Marquee/Catsoverunders/Matt Zylbert I posted a $500 Money Line wager on the Steelers that I won a small $595. Show us all a bet ticket. Just to make sure your putting your own money on the garbage you post and I don't want to see some $5 teaser either. Show me some real money bets Matt lol. I'll be waiting

 

[Bad_Cat]

I'm done talking to clowns. I don't even believe I was ever talking to your dumb ass so maybe you should shut your cockwasher.

My question is to CLEMSON. This is a public forum and when you make statements anyone can ask questions. My question is CLEMSON, in the same post you say,

"Super Bowl matchup. How can you bet against Rodgers or Brady? " and the title if your thread was "Green Bay vs New England".

Then in the same post you say,

"My money has already been loaded on GB +6 -125 and NE -6 -105. GL2A"!

In this post you say,

"Opened at +5. Jumped on it right away but bought up to +6 @ -125 vig".

If you think the Packers will be in the Super Bowl and are wagering 12.5 DIMES of monopoly money lol, why would you be BUYING points to get to +6, which isn't even crossing any key numbers? Not only do you say Green Bay wins straight up but your buying points from 5-6. If you know anything about spreads you would know 5 and 5 1/2 are dead numbers.

I'm here to tell ya your post makes no sense and goes to show your just throwing shit against a wall hoping something will stick. Your logic, if there is any, makes 0 sense. Simple question.

Also, here's something even more hilarious. You said,

"Super Bowl matchup. How can you bet against Rodgers or Brady"?

But you post a few days ago you say,

"Haha, EKG on the 'Boys and Lang on the Pack. Got Pack +6 -105 but offset 2 units on Boys -4 -125. Got a chance to middle but money sided on the Boys now. GL2A!!"

So, you bet against Rodgers 2 days ago and now say you don't know how anyone can bet against him lol. Weird. And you bet the famous 12.5 DIMES on "The Boys".

Let's see if you can provide for the few people who read your thread a few answers or a clarification as to what you said.

@ CLEMSON. Care to explain all this garbage? Hope you made your zillion dimes back that you lost with the Cowboys.

 

[Bad_Cat]

@ Call_ Me_Marquee/Catsoverunders/Matt Zylbert

Let's go over a few of your recommendations that, of course you didn't wager or count against your record, even though you suggested others to make a bet with your horrible opinions.

"PIT -1, SEA +14.5, SEA/ATL O40.5 (-120)
$48 to win $40

Of course, Pittsburgh was a no-brainer, easily taking care of Miami last Sunday. So now I'm left with two details from SEA/ATL, both of which I feel pretty good about and highly recommend for any teaser. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance to win outright here, but no matter the result, I expect a close, competitive contest that figures to be decided by a score, making SEA +14.5 sound very desirable. Should be a fun game, and one in which I anticipate a healthy amount of points, so I'm pleased to have O40.5 in there as well."

WRONG. The Seahawks have a legitimate chance of winning? You expect a close, competitive game? Wrong Lol. Does that count against your record or is that creative report writing Mr. Journalist lol.

"For me, spread action is either Seattle +7 or no bet. This game is going to be tight and competitive in my opinion, Seahawks won't disappoint in this spot because of their playoff experience, while Falcons have been consistent all season, and this could also be the final NFL game in the history of The Georgia Dome. This is probably decided by single digits, so it would only make most sense to grab the Seahawks getting a touchdown. Just a strong lean for now"

WRONG

"When I say as high as it is," just referring to how it's tough to work with because Green Bay could very easily be competitive and lose by 3 or 4 for the narrow backdoor"

WRONG

"(note: these rare props I mention don't go on my record)."

Pops don't go on your record? Hmm, why is that? Is it because you don't bet what you post or because your prop record is horrible lol

"And the Winning continues, although certainly had to sweat that out"

Did you bet the prop or just say this because the suggestion won and why in the hell would you say this if it doesn't go on your record?

"Wow tough pair of Conference Title Games. Don't remember an over/under being as high as it is for GB/ATL"

News flash Mr Vegas Insider. You don't remember because this high of a total is the highest in NFL history dummy.


This is 1 week worth of useless bullshit. You either recommend a play at a certain number, then when the play loses you say "That's why I decided not to make a play" OR you suggest something and say it doesn't count on your record OR you give opinions to sway someone to one side them never post a play. Lol. I doubt if you even bet a dollar on any of your garbage.

Tout tactics at its finest lol

 

[Bad_Cat]

Says I lost clients money, which would be impossible with four out of five winning seasons (4 MLB, 1 NFL in total).

PROVE IT with substantiated win/loss records and units +/-

 

[KAPTHAT]

sad cat u fuk up every thread u enter.........ur a fukin asshole

 

[Bad_Cat]

Lol no I just defend myself when idiots cross the line

 

[PatsFanatic]

sad cat u fuk up every thread u enter.........ur a fukin asshole

+1

 

[kouga]

Lol no I just defend myself when idiots cross the line

You defend yourself? You entered this thread insulting Clemson1 and you are the victim? You obnoxious little piece of shit.

 

[Bad_Cat]

You defend yourself? You entered this thread insulting Clemson1 and you are the victim? You obnoxious little piece of shit.

Let's hook up and watch a ballgame together so you can repeat that in person keyboard boy

 

[kouga]

Let's hook up and watch a ballgame together so you can roast that in person keyboard boy

Who`s the keyboard warrior here? lol you run your mouth like diarrhea in this thread because you know you would get your ass fucked up in real life. You are nothing but a lame ass bitch, so keep sucking it.

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Let's hook up and watch a ballgame together so you can repeat that in person keyboard boy

Looks like that'll be impossible now, since you've been BANNED yet again hahahahaha

Almost makes me feel bad for the Retard, since this forum is Bad_Cat's life. Unfortunately, though, he has no clue how to handicap, is losing his bets in every single one of his many threads, and is just an overall clown that has zero credibility. LMAO what a loser. Probably the worst "handicapper" here (his record on posted plays certainly suggests that)

Bad_Cat's Final 2016-17 NFL Betting Record: 23-29-1 (44.2%!!!!)
(Or 23-33-1 , 41%, if you include his 0-4 record on parlays)


Now with the TRASH finally taken out and the cancer/worst handicapper of the RX gone for good, back to the original topic of the thread. Getting the Pack on that key number of +6 really isn't a bad idea at all

 

[PrinceoftheCity]

This is an outstanding play. I'm on it to.

ATL defense has many holes, lack of experience Rodgers will have time behind a great O line. ATL has faced 1 good offense since they last faced GB, and gave up 32 points at home in that one.

ATL and GB have been scoring at almost the same exact rate points per game during GBs streak. This is too many points, really like the +6.

Clayborn and Trufant two stars on the Falcons defense are out for this one. Rodgers in revenge games is very very good.

ATL is 5-21 ATS in the past 26 instances at home coming off a home win, in another home game.

Even if luck is on ATL's side Arod will probably backdoor the +6.

 

[bones1980]

This is an outstanding play. I'm on it to.

ATL defense has many holes, lack of experience Rodgers will have time behind a great O line. ATL has faced 1 good offense since they last faced GB, and gave up 32 points at home in that one.

ATL and GB have been scoring at almost the same exact rate points per game during GBs streak. This is too many points, really like the +6.

Clayborn and Trufant two stars on the Falcons defense are out for this one. Rodgers in revenge games is very very good.

ATL is 5-21 ATS in the past 26 instances at home coming off a home win, in another home game.

Even if luck is on ATL's side Arod will probably backdoor the +6.

It should be a great game ! They are about the same on both sides of the ball-this year! Green Bay hasn't played a a great offense since Atlanta! I will be there rooting for Atl but might take the 6

 

[kouga]

Looks like that'll be impossible now, since you've been BANNED yet again hahahahaha

Almost makes me feel bad for the Retard, since this forum is Bad_Cat's life. Unfortunately, though, he has no clue how to handicap, is losing his bets in every single one of his many threads, and is just an overall clown that has zero credibility. LMAO what a loser. Probably the worst "handicapper" here (his record on posted plays certainly suggests that)

Bad_Cat's Final 2016-17 NFL Betting Record: 23-29-1 (44.2%!!!!)
(Or 23-33-1 , 41%, if you include his 0-4 record on parlays)


Now with the TRASH finally taken out and the cancer/worst handicapper of the RX gone for good, back to the original topic of the thread. Getting the Pack on that key number of +6 really isn't a bad idea at all

I reported him ( maybe I`m not the only one ), and I`m really glad the rx mods took action, thank you. Clemson1, sorry for cluttering your thread and good luck with your pick.