FZIT & DEAC Cyber DeathMatch thread

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
If you listen to idiots like Richard Dawkins, what does it matter?

"Humans have always wondered about the meaning of life...
life has no higher purpose than to perpetuate the survival of DNA...
life has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but
blind pitiless indifference."
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
If you listen to idiots like Richard Dawkins, what does it matter?

"Humans have always wondered about the meaning of life...
life has no higher purpose than to perpetuate the survival of DNA...
life has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but
blind pitiless indifference."




Hmmm...let's compare credentials.



festeringZit: Internet jackass named after a teenage malady. From Texas.



Richard Dawkins: Studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, where he was tutored by Nobel Prize-winning ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen, graduating in 1962. He continued as a research student under Tinbergen's supervision at the University of Oxford, receiving his M.A. and D.Phil. degrees in 1966, while staying as a research assistant for another year. Tinbergen was a pioneer in the study of animal behaviour, particularly the questions of instinct, learning and choice. His research in this period concerned models of animal decision making.

From 1967 to 1969, Dawkins was an assistant professor of zoology at the University of California, Berkeley. He returned to the University of Oxford in 1970 as a lecturer in zoology, and in 1990 was appointed a Reader.

In 1995, Dawkins was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford, a position that had been endowed by Charles Simonyi with the express intention that the holder "be expected to make important contributions to the public understanding of some scientific field". Since 1970, he has been a fellow of New College, Oxford. In September 2008, he retired from Oxford.

Dawkins has been recognized many times as a science writer. He was awarded a Doctor of Science by the University of Oxford in 1989. He holds honorary doctorates in science from the University of Huddersfield, University of Westminster, Durham University, the University of Hull, and the University of Antwerp, and honorary doctorates from the Open University, the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and the University of Valencia. He holds honorary doctorates of letters from the University of St Andrews and the Australian National University, and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1997 and the Royal Society in 2001. He is one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society. In 1987, Dawkins received a Royal Society of Literature award and a Los Angeles Times Literary Prize for his book, The Blind Watchmaker. In the same year, he received a Sci. Tech Prize for Best Television Documentary Science Programme of the Year, for the BBC Horizon episode entitled The Blind Watchmaker. Asteroid 8331 Dawkins is named after Dawkins. His other awards have included the Zoological Society of London Silver Medal (1989), Finlay innovation award (1990), the Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize (1994), the American Humanist Association's Humanist of the Year Award (1996), the fifth International Cosmos Prize (1997), the Kistler Prize (2001), the Medal of the Presidency of the Italian Republic (2001), the Bicentennial Kelvin Medal of The Royal Philosophical Society of Glasgow (2002) and the Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest (2009). In 2005, the Hamburg-based Alfred Toepfer Foundation awarded him its Shakespeare Prize in recognition of his "concise and accessible presentation of scientific knowledge". He won the Lewis Thomas Prize for Writing about Science for 2006 and the Galaxy British Book Awards Author of the Year Award for 2007. In the same year, he was listed by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2007, and was awarded the Deschner Award, named after German anti-clerical author Karlheinz Deschner.

Dawkins has been recognized as an intellectual. He topped Prospect magazine's 2004 list of the top 100 public British intellectuals, as decided by the readers, receiving twice as many votes as the runner-up and placing high on the worldwide 2005 and 2008 listings of Top 100 Public Intellectuals Poll. He has been short-listed as a candidate in their 2008 follow-up poll.​




So in the words of Richard Dawkins, anyone who would side with a festeringZit over one of the most renowned scientists of our times "must either be ignorant, stupid or insane."




Dawkins bio courtesy of Wikipedia
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
Hmmm...let's compare credentials.


festeringZit: Internet jackass named after a teenage malady. From Texas.



Richard Dawkins: Studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, where he was tutored by Nobel Prize-winning ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen, graduating in 1962. He continued as a research student under Tinbergen's supervision at the University of Oxford, receiving his M.A. and D.Phil. degrees in 1966, while staying as a research assistant for another year. Tinbergen was a pioneer in the study of animal behaviour, particularly the questions of instinct, learning and choice. His research in this period concerned models of animal decision making.

From 1967 to 1969, Dawkins was an assistant professor of zoology at the University of California, Berkeley. He returned to the University of Oxford in 1970 as a lecturer in zoology, and in 1990 was appointed a Reader.

In 1995, Dawkins was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford, a position that had been endowed by Charles Simonyi with the express intention that the holder "be expected to make important contributions to the public understanding of some scientific field". Since 1970, he has been a fellow of New College, Oxford. In September 2008, he retired from Oxford.

Dawkins has been recognized many times as a science writer. He was awarded a Doctor of Science by the University of Oxford in 1989. He holds honorary doctorates in science from the University of Huddersfield, University of Westminster, Durham University, the University of Hull, and the University of Antwerp, and honorary doctorates from the Open University, the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and the University of Valencia. He holds honorary doctorates of letters from the University of St Andrews and the Australian National University, and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1997 and the Royal Society in 2001. He is one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society. In 1987, Dawkins received a Royal Society of Literature award and a Los Angeles Times Literary Prize for his book, The Blind Watchmaker. In the same year, he received a Sci. Tech Prize for Best Television Documentary Science Programme of the Year, for the BBC Horizon episode entitled The Blind Watchmaker. Asteroid 8331 Dawkins is named after Dawkins. His other awards have included the Zoological Society of London Silver Medal (1989), Finlay innovation award (1990), the Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize (1994), the American Humanist Association's Humanist of the Year Award (1996), the fifth International Cosmos Prize (1997), the Kistler Prize (2001), the Medal of the Presidency of the Italian Republic (2001), the Bicentennial Kelvin Medal of The Royal Philosophical Society of Glasgow (2002) and the Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest (2009). In 2005, the Hamburg-based Alfred Toepfer Foundation awarded him its Shakespeare Prize in recognition of his "concise and accessible presentation of scientific knowledge". He won the Lewis Thomas Prize for Writing about Science for 2006 and the Galaxy British Book Awards Author of the Year Award for 2007. In the same year, he was listed by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2007, and was awarded the Deschner Award, named after German anti-clerical author Karlheinz Deschner.

Dawkins has been recognized as an intellectual. He topped Prospect magazine's 2004 list of the top 100 public British intellectuals, as decided by the readers, receiving twice as many votes as the runner-up and placing high on the worldwide 2005 and 2008 listings of Top 100 Public Intellectuals Poll. He has been short-listed as a candidate in their 2008 follow-up poll.​


So in the words of Richard Dawkins, anyone who would side with a festeringZit over one of the most renowned scientists of our times "must either be ignorant, stupid or insane."




Dawkins bio courtesy of Wikipedia

Typical Ad Hominem logical fallacy, but this time he attacks the name of my forum handle. ROFL.

The idiocy of Dawkins' statement stands on it's own, and blatantly shows
the utter stupidity of his ideology.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Typical Ad Hominem logical fallacy, but this time he attacks the name of my forum handle. ROFL.

The idiocy of Dawkins' statement stands on it's own, and blatantly shows
the utter stupidity of his ideology.



On what basis can you claim that Dawkins' statement is idiotic and his ideology is stupid despite the fact that 99.999% of the scientific community disagrees with you?
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Everyone reading this exchange keep in mind that festeringZit has admitted to believing that every single word in the bible is literally true down to the talking serpents and donkeys.

Dawkins' views cannot be true to him because they would completely destroy his world view.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
Everyone reading this exchange keep in mind that festeringZit has admitted to believing that every single word in the bible is literally true down to the talking serpents and donkeys.

Dawkins' views cannot be true to him because they would completely destroy his world view.

Dawkins' views cannot be false to DEAC, because they would completely
destroy his world view.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
Everyone reading this exchange keep in mind that festeringZit has admitted to believing that every single word in the bible is literally true down to the talking serpents and donkeys.

Dawkins' views cannot be true to him because they would completely destroy his world view.

I believe along with the majority of Christians and biblical theologians for the
last ~4,000 years: That the Bible is to be interpreted according to the
art and science of Biblical Hermeneutics (look it up).
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
I believe along with the majority of Christians and biblical theologians for the
last ~4,000 years: That the Bible is to be interpreted according to the
art and science of Biblical Hermeneutics (look it up).


Do you or do you not believe that the talking donkey story actually happened?
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
where is the proof that there is no God? The complexities of the world around us should be proof enough that there is. How one perceives God should be the only debate.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
where is the proof that there is no God? The complexities of the world around us should be proof enough that there is. How one perceives God should be the only debate.

There is a difference between saying that there is no god versus saying that talking donkey fables are bullshit.

Because the universe is complex, however, is no reason to attribute it to supernatural forces. If it wasn't complex, we wouldn't be here to observe it.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
Do you or do you not believe that the talking donkey story actually happened?

Why are you so obsessed with the donkey story? I believe that
Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

For an atheist like you, it would seem that the Resurrection
would be far more unlikely occurrence than a talking donkey.

But yes, I tend to believe that the story of Balaam's Ass
was a historical one.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
But yes, I tend to believe that the story of Balaam's Ass
was a historical one.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!


And this is a person qualified to judge Richard Dawkins' work?

This is why I'll never, ever be able to take you seriously.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,948
Tokens
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!


And this is a person qualified to judge Richard Dawkins' work?

This is why I'll never, ever be able to take you seriously.

Interesting, I suppose you dismiss the other great Christian scientists
throughout history.

Newton, Pasteur, Pascal, Lavoisier, Boyle, Ohm, Mendel, Lister, G. W. Carver, Liebniz, ...
to name just a few...

Notice you also ignored my comment about the resurrection.

Fact is, your rhetoric is lame.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
**
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
will festering zit be force fed the cracker of death....

or will deac be drowned beneath the pus of a festering zit????@)

only God may know.....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,670
Messages
13,535,792
Members
100,386
Latest member
messagequick679
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com