Fyi Regarding Doc Mercer.

[Risk44]

His bucolic responses could only be appreciated by an adolescent.

Im laughing at you though, and thats funny :nohead:

 

[bigplay]

I didn't even get to welcome you back and you had to start with bucolic responses.:nohead:

Maybe you can sneek in a word on where your new home will be.
:toast:

 

[BASEHEAD]

Why not ban him? Double standard??? :think2:
He even started a whole thread just to bash doc mercer. He called it a poll.

Quit your crying.

My next poll is going to be:

"How many months until Doc is (allowed) back?"

A.1
B.2
C.3-6
D.7-12
E.12+
F.Never

 

[ScottL]

there is no need to go overboard with the namecalling.

It isn't possible to go overboard in reference to this [something that rhymes with Couchebag]. I stopped in a few days ago, saw his name and hit the X. When Doc is here I don't put him on ignore. I put the entire site on ignore.

 

[kingbill]

Doc is banned and can't defend himself, how about going easy on the bashfest. Comment if you want but there is no need to go overboard with the namecalling. Kingbill, I don't mean to single you out solely, just using your post as an example.



Thanks, wil.

Fair enough...

 

[festeringZit]

It isn't possible to go overboard in reference to this [something that rhymes with Couchebag]. I stopped in a few days ago, saw his name and hit the X. When Doc is here I don't put him on ignore. I put the entire site on ignore.

There is truth to this, there were a few days where Doc had
filled the whole forum with empty threads - and I decided to not
even bother to visit the forum those days.

 

[RaoulDuke]

There is truth to this, there were a few days where Doc had
filled the whole forum with empty threads - and I decided to not
even bother to visit the forum those days.

Damn if thats the case we should of kept him around.

 

[punter]

Well put.

 

[festeringZit]

Well put.

I am well aware that my conservative views are at odds with
many on here. Guess what? I'm not losing any sleep over it.

Punter again, adding so much to the discussion as usual.

 

[barman]

Damn if thats the case we should of kept him around.

heh....ZIT is so full of it. He's addicted to comin into the PoliticoPub and being thrashed. No amount of DOC M or anyone else is likely to dissaude him from creating at least a couple of his own finger-wagging social rants about the Evil Liberal Homo Muslim Global Warming threats to his life.

 

[festeringZit]

heh....ZIT is so full of it. He's addicted to comin into the PoliticoPub and being thrashed. No amount of DOC M or anyone else is likely to dissaude him from creating at least a couple of his own finger-wagging social rants about the Evil Liberal Homo Muslim Global Warming threats to his life.

You forgot a couple Barman:

1. Catching you stalking people on here and on EOG.

2. Catching you lying about your cult beliefs on here.

First you say you don't have any idea where I got the idea you talked
to dead people:

Then, when you see I have caught you lying about it and have evidence to prove it, you suddenly admit to it, like it's nothing:

And here is Barman claiming that those with "faith" enough can talk to any dead person that ever lived: