funny how the right are all of a sudden quick to call Michael Moore a liar....

[3peet]

even when his ENTIRE movie was based on FACT.

The right is so funny. It's like the blind leading the blind.

**************************
Hitting that 10 teamer any week now.

 

[volhound]

i have not seen the movie, but how can anything be based on fact. either it is or it isn't. btw the left isn't any better

vol

 

[Phaedrus]

Phaedrus wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
Michael Moore says:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
[Farenheit 9/11 is]an op-ed piece. It's my opinion about the last four years of the Bush administration. And that's what I call it. I'm not trying to pretend that this is some sort of, you know, fair and balanced work of journalism.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Interview here.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

In fact there are several comments worth noting in the thread from which the above is taken. Read it here.

Also of interest:

Richard Bushnell's "Bowling for Truth"

And just to reiterate, I have no opinion of Fahrenheit 9/11, because I have not yet seen it. I will admit to a predisposition towards a certain opinion based on previous work by Moore with which I am familiar, but I am not casting stones on it directly. I also have no desire to see Moore censored, as I have stated previously. I just can't believe so many people get this worked up over his work because they see it as some sort of ultimate truth, when even Moore himself disclaims such notions.


Phaedrus

 

[Shotgun]

I guess it all depends on what you mean by "facts". To the left a half-truth becomes whole if you just round up.

Here is the best article so far detailing Moore's facts.

The 56 Deceits of Michael Moore

http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm

 

[American]

Moore could make a pro-Bush documentary and present just as strong an arguement, if not stronger with his clever editing and out-of-context style.