only one president had an entire two terms of economic malaise and poor jobs growth, literally caused the GD II (that in and by itself makes him the worst). At the end of the day, society needs economic growth and jobs, that's what keeps us together.
the worst president divided the country racially
the worst president used class warfare to further divide us
the worst president had government take over healthcare, the biggest clusterfuck perpetuated on the American people since the Vietnam War
the worst president didn't leave a security force in Iraq and created ISIS
the worst president has been wrong about everything, from his economic stimulus which only stimulated the deficit, to keeping your health insurance to reducing healthcare costs to improving healthcare quality to changing DC to restoring international respect. Everything he said he would improve, he made worse, EVERYTHING
the worst president divided the country racially
the worst president used class warfare to further divide us
the worst president had government take over healthcare, the biggest clusterfuck perpetuated on the American people since the Vietnam War
the worst president didn't leave a security force in Iraq and created ISIS
the worst president has been wrong about everything, from his economic stimulus which only stimulated the deficit, to keeping your health insurance to reducing healthcare costs to improving healthcare quality to changing DC to restoring international respect. Everything he said he would improve, he made worse, EVERYTHING
Bush got part of the economic equation right, he cut taxes which stimulated growth and we had a strong economy for a few years
He still spent too much money, although not has much as the Democrats wanted. The democrats got all their pent up pork back with Obama's "economic stimulus"
In 2005 they tried to pass some banking reforms, but were told they "didn't need to fix something that wasn't broke"
What he did horribly wrong was mismanage the war, and the consequences were catastrophic. If he had the surge from day one, the war would have been over much sooner, lives would have been saved, money would have been saved and obama would not have been in a position to fuck it up like he did. After doing it right towards the end of his term, Obama undid it all
Iraq was one of Obama's greatest accomplishments, remember that idiocy? Now they're back to blaming his policy on Bush, priceless
He still spent too much money, although not has much as the Democrats wanted. The democrats got all their pent up pork back with Obama's "economic stimulus"
In 2005 they tried to pass some banking reforms, but were told they "didn't need to fix something that wasn't broke"
What he did horribly wrong was mismanage the war, and the consequences were catastrophic. If he had the surge from day one, the war would have been over much sooner, lives would have been saved, money would have been saved and obama would not have been in a position to fuck it up like he did. After doing it right towards the end of his term, Obama undid it all
Iraq was one of Obama's greatest accomplishments, remember that idiocy? Now they're back to blaming his policy on Bush, priceless
Impossible to be worse. ISIS is a direct result of the Iraq war. Bush signed an agreement to pull the troops and leave no forces behind. His decisions have cost thousands of American lives.
Imagine that leading a total economic collapse isnt even the worst part of his presidency.
Scary what he did to this country.
LBJ was another classic,
the Vietnam War, no need to elaborate
and the Great Society, which created the dysfunctional inner city family and poverty we have today
to his credit, he passed the CRA which cost him a lot of political blood. Between that and Vietnam, he was essentially forced to not run for reelection
the Vietnam War, no need to elaborate
and the Great Society, which created the dysfunctional inner city family and poverty we have today
to his credit, he passed the CRA which cost him a lot of political blood. Between that and Vietnam, he was essentially forced to not run for reelection
Muslims have been marauding around the world slaughtering people for 1500 years, but you've got brainless libtards blaming one of
their latest groups on George Bush, one can't even fathom how stupid these people are - totally ignorant of history and perspective.
Duh DDD DUhh DDDDD Duhh B B Bush's fault.
Fucking retards.
their latest groups on George Bush, one can't even fathom how stupid these people are - totally ignorant of history and perspective.
Duh DDD DUhh DDDDD Duhh B B Bush's fault.
Fucking retards.
You always say this and I always correct you because you're wrong.
AQ filled a terrorism gap for years and years. If AQ was not active in Iraq, ISIS or whatever terrorism group would've been active. There will always be a terrorism group active in the Middle East and it has nothing to do with whether a war is ongoing or not or whether we pull out of this place or that place.
These guys have been waging war in their minds for decades. Has nothing to do with invading Iraq. It started decades before that time.
It's been that way since the middle/dark ages... Iran was a great empire called Persia who dominated Asia centuries ago.
The Persian Empire (Iran) is any of a series of imperial dynasties centered in Persia (Iran). The first of these was established by Cyrus the Great in 550 BCE with the conquest of Media, Lydiaand Babylonia. Several later dynasties "claimed to be heirs of the Achaemenids".[SUP][1]
**[/SUP][FONT="]For the last 2600 years, up to the year 1935, following a naming convention that was started by the ancient Greeks, in all Western languages today’s Iran was known as "Persia", a word that was different from the word used in Persian, which was always “Iran”. There are many other examples of such naming conventions in the world. Indians call their country “Bharat”, Egyptians call their land “Missr”, in Finland they call their country “Suomi”, the Japanese call their country “Nihon”, and Germans call their country “Deutschland” (2). By the same token, the language of Persia (Iran) has always been internationally known as Persian. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The naming conventions for Persia (aka Iran) changed in 1935. The suggestion for the name change from Persia to Iran is said to have come from the Persian ambassador to Germany, who was a Nazi sympathizer. In 1935 Germany was ruled by Hitler. Aryanism was equated by the Nazis as the highest level of human civilization, in an article of faith based on a vulgar Hegelian hyperbola. Apparently the Persian ambassador was persuaded by his Nazi friends that Persia would be better off as an ally of Nazi Germany. Moreover, he became convinced that the country should be called by its Persian name, Iran, in Western languages. This was to signal a new beginning and bring home to the world the new era in Iranian history, one that would emphasize the Aryan aspect of its people. The name Iran is a cognate of the old word Aryan. The Persian Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent out a memo to all foreign embassies in Tehran, requesting that the country be called "Iran." Unfortunately "Iran" sounded alien to non-Iranians, and many failed to recognize its connection with the historic Persia. Some (Westerners) thought that it was perhaps one of the new countries like Kuwait or Jordan carved out of the ruins of the Ottoman Empire, or like “Pakistan”, carved out of India. Even today many confuse Iran with Iraq. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The confusion has been made worse by the usage of the word Farsi, which is the Persian word for Persian, just as “Deutsch” is the German word for German. To make matters worse, for marketing purposes Rumi and other Persian poets are presented by American book publishers as Sufi poets and not as Persian poets (3). It is generally known that Dante was Italian and Shakespeare was British. But most Americans know Rumi as a “Sufi poet” from somewhere in the East, as if Sufi were a nationality. As the references in a large body of European texts (Examples: texts by Schopenhauer, Nietzche, Hegel, Montesquieu, etc.) indicate, Persian civilization has been very well known in European philosophy and culture for centuries. For today’s Persians (Iranians), the name "Iran" refers to a rich and historic civilization. For most non-Iranians, Iran is a country in the Middle East with a more or less Islamic identity, and with no clear connection with the historic "Persia".[/FONT]
Yeah, you keep saying that but I will take the words of Lt General Michael Flynn, former head of defense intelligence agency and Retired general William Odom who said:
"The actions of GW Bush as president created the conditions for ISIS to emerge and thrive"
They probably know more than some of us. They have some pretty telling interviews out there. You should give them a read.
