Exbookie Wants To Help The Players Week 1 Regseason

Search
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,570
Tokens
After the fact I know, but why a big play on Cinnci? Balt is 13-4 ats last 17 at home vs cinnci & cinnci internal problems are well known. Also Det 3-7 ats last 10 with Atl. In both these games you were bucking big ats trends in the 1st game of the year, why? You mentioned in 1 of your threads that your system kicked in in week 5, why a big 1st 1/2 play in a game in week one? Many unknowns league wide, I respect & apprecaite your threads as do most, I just did not understand basis for the investment plays at all. GL on all your future sports investments. :103631605
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
After the fact I know, but why a big play on Cinnci? Balt is 13-4 ats last 17 at home vs cinnci & cinnci internal problems are well known. Also Det 7-3 ats last 10 with Atl. In both these games you were bucking big ats trends in the 1st game of the year, why? You mentioned in 1 of your threads that your system kicked in in week 5, why a big 1st 1/2 play in a game in week one? Many unknowns league wide, I respect & apprecaite your threads as do most, I just did not understand basis for the investment plays at all. GL on all your future sports investments. :103631605


system kicks in week 4....I show trends as candy ...but I feel that when you say Balt is 13-4 ats last 17 at home vs Atl....do you know what that means...most they play them two time a year so you are going to base your play on 8 years trends!!! lots of people come and go every year. what does last years team have to do with this years games??
yes they are fun to see...but dont base my picks on them....Detroit had the best d-line in "pre"....did not base it on them being 4-0...they had it going and could stop anyone.....but....thats not what happen so I lost.
Any one that caps know its about what you think that will happen vs what happens in the game...great when they match.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
393
Tokens
Once you've been wagering for more than a year (and no longer green), who really gives a crap about trends? Not only is that junk offered for free by e mail by many places, but its the same stuff out of The Gold Sheet, Phil Steele's Power Sweep, etc., real players don't give a damn about trends. Tough year last year, and not a great start to this one, hope things turn around.

Trends can be a huge help at times. If you got a rational view on a pick but are hesitating, ive found a trend or system play, can push up my chances of a winner. Trends have been big help for me over the last few years.

Keep on posting those 'candy' plays ace. There's a few system plays from this week i didn't know about and they helped me big. Useful additional factor them.

Thanks for contributing your work dude.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
Trends can be a huge help at times. If you got a rational view on a pick but are hesitating, ive found a trend or system play, can push up my chances of a winner. Trends have been big help for me over the last few years.

Keep on posting those 'candy' plays ace. There's a few system plays from this week i didn't know about and they helped me big. Useful additional factor them.

Thanks for contributing your work dude.

DENVER (7 - 9) at OAKLAND (4 - 12) - 9/8/2008, 10:15 PM
Top Trends for this game.
DENVER is 10-22 ATS (-14.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
DENVER is 10-22 ATS (-14.2 Units) in all lined games over the last 3 seasons.
DENVER is 5-15 ATS (-11.5 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
DENVER is 2-10 ATS (-9.0 Units) versus division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
OAKLAND is 1-8 ATS (-7.8 Units) in games where the line is +3 to -3 over the last 3 seasons.
OAKLAND is 66-91 ATS (-34.1 Units) against conference opponents since 1992.
OAKLAND is 16-30 ATS (-17.0 Units) in home games versus division opponents since 1992.

Head-to-Head Series History
OAKLAND is 4-0 against the spread versus DENVER over the last 3 seasons
DENVER is 3-1 straight up against OAKLAND over the last 3 seasons
2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

Broncos @ Raiders-- Denver won eight of last ten series games, four of five at Coliseum, with wins here by 14-28-14-4 points; the last 18 times Oakland scored less than 23 points in series, they've lost to Broncos. Denver lost three of last four road openers, with only win 15-14 at Buffalo (-3)- they scored 10.3 ppg in those four games. Raiders started last five seasons 0-1, failing to cover last five home openers. Under is 5-1 in last six Denver road openers, 4-1 in Oakland's last five home openers.

10:15 PM DENVER vs. OAKLAND
Denver is 1-7 ATS in its last 8 games on the road
Denver is 1-6 SU in its last 7 games on the road
Oakland is 4-1 ATS in its last 5 games when playing Denver
Oakland is 1-5 SU in its last 6 games when playing Denver
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,570
Tokens
Balt being being 13-4 last 17 at home vs Cinnci imo means alot regardless of the player changes, it shows a pettern of one team feeling they own the other in this certain situation & as I mentioned Cinnci internal problems are well documented.
Detroit has been awful on both sides of the ball for years, why not wait to get them in a better spot? 1st game of the year on the road vs a team that Detroit basically has no film on & a team that they have a history of struggling with in this situation.
1st 1/2 plays in week 1 for big $$ were imo out of character for someone like you Ace. If the info you use kicks in in week #4 How can you have faith in any 1st 1/2 play?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
2,091
Tokens
After the fact I know, but why a big play on Cinnci? Balt is 13-4 ats last 17 at home vs cinnci & cinnci internal problems are well known. Also Det 3-7 ats last 10 with Atl. In both these games you were bucking big ats trends in the 1st game of the year, why? You mentioned in 1 of your threads that your system kicked in in week 5, why a big 1st 1/2 play in a game in week one? Many unknowns league wide, I respect & apprecaite your threads as do most, I just did not understand basis for the investment plays at all. GL on all your future sports investments. :103631605
Because he's working for the books now. Fade his plays if you want to win.

Do you think its a coinceadence? Ever since he drew a huge following of posters, all he does is give out losers.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,570
Tokens
Trend for the Den/Oak game not mentioned Denver is 7-3 su last 10 in Oakland. Why is this trend that pertains to tonights game not mentioned?
 

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
7,018
Tokens
Because he's working for the books now. Fade his plays if you want to win.

Do you think its a coincidence? Ever since he drew a huge following of posters, all he does is give out losers.


Wow if he;s working for the books then he is one great handicapper.

I would love to see anyone purposely lose more than they win,it's like duh isn't that the same as picking winners you fucking nim-rod?
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
Balt being being 13-4 last 17 at home vs Cinnci imo means alot regardless of the player changes, it shows a pettern of one team feeling they own the other in this certain situation & as I mentioned Cinnci internal problems are well documented.
Detroit has been awful on both sides of the ball for years, why not wait to get them in a better spot? 1st game of the year on the road vs a team that Detroit basically has no film on & a team that they have a history of struggling with in this situation.
1st 1/2 plays in week 1 for big $$ were imo out of character for someone like you Ace. If the info you use kicks in in week #4 How can you have faith in any 1st 1/2 play?

SD game I like the whole game...but I did not want to lay that much wood. so I took a short cut....no matter which way I would of when on that game it would have been a lost. 1st week I puch myself a little...in my mind to pick 3 games and if I win one and lost two of the game I would only be down 2 units....we all know it did not work out that way...you make good points on the games....but I never 2nd guess myself...I see a edge and go with it and make my stand. there are 240 more games and this will be a lesson.

3 I mark for this week coming up...if it was you which one would be your Investment play?
N.O.
Ari
Hou
sea
thinking a bet against SF is gold...you know Iam big on turn overs....SF in preseason did 11 and got 5 more in week1.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
Wow if he;s working for the books then he is one great handicapper.

I would love to see anyone purposely lose more than they win,it's like duh isn't that the same as picking winners you fucking nim-rod?


:missingte I will go down in RX history
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
Trend for the Den/Oak game not mentioned Denver is 7-3 su last 10 in Oakland. Why is this trend that pertains to tonights game not mentioned?


this guy I get them from does 100s on each games ....this is all that he posted tonight
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,570
Tokens
:think2: Why make any investment plays until after week 4??? Not sure why you thought had any edge in any game in opening week, that completely confuses me. Preseason, starters in most cases play no more than 1.5 quarters, what info do you get from that? Many players from preseason are home betting on the games. I have followed your threads for over 3 yrs now & your NFL plays would be only be only ones I would even consider. You obviously put great effort into the NFL, but for the life of me I will not understand big bets in week 1, unless you have some kind of inside info, which can be assumed you do not.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
Any smart handicapper would never make his best play a road favorite on a home opener. Especially not two, and on shit teams at that.


show you this last year....maybe you can answer this time!

Investment plays only
2004 25-16 +$28,400 we I working for the books that year?
2005 36-18 +$44181...here?
2006 19-22 -$11390...o-yes they play me that year:missingte

2007 26-26 +$3468....did I win that year and you lost with those fades?

so in your world making over $60,000 is to little ?

answer...you did not last year...
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,715
Tokens
:think2: Why make any investment plays until after week 4??? Not sure why you thought had any edge in any game in opening week, that completely confuses me. Preseason, starters in most cases play no more than 1.5 quarters, what info do you get from that? Many players from preseason are home betting on the games. I have followed your threads for over 3 yrs now & your NFL plays would be only be only ones I would even consider. You obviously put great effort into the NFL, but for the life of me I will not understand big bets in week 1, unless you have some kind of inside info, which can be assumed you do not.

if you go back over the years I have alway bet 1-3 plays a week (investment)
last year I when 6-1 +$6000 + WEEK 1

from that thread http://forum.therx.com/showthread.php?t=506398&highlight=exbookie&page=10
my Plays For Week 1

Hou -3 -110...............$500.00 Winner

Den-3 -109................$800.00 Lost

Det+2 +100...............$2000.00 winner


Sea-6 +102................$2100.00

wash Un 34 1/2-108....$2200.00 Winner


3 Team Teaser 10 Point Move

wash Under 44 1/2 Win
det +12
sea+4............................$200.00
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,900
Messages
13,574,895
Members
100,882
Latest member
topbettor24
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com