Of teams which play each other this week. Listed below are records for past three seasons. Scores in parentheses. Home teams in Caps. Teams in bold lettering winners vs the spread.
('04)
KANSAS CITY favored by 3 over Atlanta ........................................ ( 56-10)
('00) Kansas City favored by 4 over ATLANTA ........................................ ( 13-29)
('05) OAKLAND favored by 3 over Buffalo ............................................... ( 38-17)
('04) OAKLAND favored by 3½ over Buffalo ........................................... ( 13-10)
('07) TENNESSEE favored by 3½ over Houston ..................................... ( 28-20)
('07) Tennessee favored by 1½ over HOUSTON .................................... ( 38-36)
('06) HOUSTON favored by 1 over Tennessee (OT) ............................... ( 20-26)
('06) TENNESSEE favored by 3 over Houston ........................................ ( 28-22)
('05) TENNESSEE favored by 7 over Houston ....................................... ( 13-10)
('05) HOUSTON favored by 3 over Tennessee ....................................... ( 20-34)
('04) CINCINNATI favored by 5½ over New York Giants ........................ ( 23-22)
('07) WASHINGTON favored by 8½ over Arizona ................................... ( 21-19)
('05) Washington favored by 4 over ARIZONA ......................................... ( 17-13)
('02) WASHINGTON favored by 6½ over Arizona .................................... ( 31-23)
('07) NEW ENGLAND favored by 22 over Miami .................................... ( 28- 7)
('07) New England favored by 16 over MIAMI ......................................... ( 49-28)
('06) New England favored by 3½ over MIAMI ......................................... ( 0-21)
('06) NEW ENGLAND favored by 10 over Miami ..................................... ( 20-10)
('05) NEW ENGLAND favored by 5½ over Miami ................................... ( 26-28)
('05) New England favored by 3 over MIAMI ........................................... ( 23-16)
('06) CHICAGO favored by 13½ over Tampa Bay (OT) .......................... ( 34-31)
('05) TAMPA BAY favored by 3 over Chicago ......................................... ( 10-13)
('04) TAMPA BAY favored by 7 over Chicago ........................................... ( 19- 7)
('06) MINNESOTA favored by 1½ over Carolina (OT) .............................. ( 16-13)
('05) CAROLINA favored by 7½ over Minnesota ..................................... ( 38-13)
('07) SEATTLE favored by 8½ over St Louis Rams ................................. ( 33- 7)
('07) Seattle favored by 3 over ST LOUIS RAMS .................................... ( 24-19)
('06) SEATTLE favored by 3½ over St Louis Rams ................................ ( 24-22)
('06) Seattle favored by 3 over ST LOUIS RAMS..................................... ( 30-28)
('05) ST LOUIS RAMS favored by 3 over Seattle .................................... ( 31-37)
('05) SEATTLE favored by 7 over St Louis Rams .................................... ( 31-16)
('06) DETROIT favored by 6 over San Francisco ................................... ( 13-19)
('03) SAN FRANCISCO favored by 7 over Detroit ................................... ( 24-17)
('04) Denver favored by 4½ over NEW ORLEANS ................................. ( 34-13)
('00) NEW ORLEANS favored by 1 over Denver .................................... ( 23-38)
('04) PITTSBURGH even with Philadelphia ............................................. ( 27- 3)
('00) PITTSBURGH favored by 3½ over Philadelphia (OT) .................... ( 23-26)
('07) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 6½ over Jacksonville .......................... ( 28-25)
('07) Indianapolis favored by 3 over JACKSONVILLE ............................ ( 29- 7)
('06) Indianapolis favored by 1 over JACKSONVILLE ............................. ( 17-44)
('06) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 7 over Jacksonville ............................... ( 21-14)
('05) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 9 over Jacksonville ............................. ( 10- 3)
('05) Indianapolis favored by 8 over JACKSONVILLE .............................. ( 26-18)
('07) Cleveland favored by 3 over BALTIMORE (OT) ............................... ( 33-30)
('07) Baltimore favored by 4 over CLEVELAND ....................................... ( 13-37)
('06) Baltimore favored by 6½ over CLEVELAND .................................... ( 15-14)
('06) BALTIMORE favored by 11½ over Cleveland ................................. ( 27-17)
('05) Baltimore favored by 3 over CLEVELAND ....................................... ( 16-20)
('05) BALTIMORE favored by 6 over Cleveland ....................................... ( 16- 3)
('07) DALLAS favored by 7 over Green Bay ............................................ ( 37-29)
('04) GREEN BAY favored by 3½ over Dallas .......................................... ( 41-20)
('05) San Diego favored by 6½ over NEW YORK JETS .......................... ( 26-21)
('04) SAN DIEGO favored by 7 over New York Jets (Playoff) (OT) ......... (17-20)
('00) Kansas City favored by 4 over ATLANTA ........................................ ( 13-29)
('05) OAKLAND favored by 3 over Buffalo ............................................... ( 38-17)
('04) OAKLAND favored by 3½ over Buffalo ........................................... ( 13-10)
('07) TENNESSEE favored by 3½ over Houston ..................................... ( 28-20)
('07) Tennessee favored by 1½ over HOUSTON .................................... ( 38-36)
('06) HOUSTON favored by 1 over Tennessee (OT) ............................... ( 20-26)
('06) TENNESSEE favored by 3 over Houston ........................................ ( 28-22)
('05) TENNESSEE favored by 7 over Houston ....................................... ( 13-10)
('05) HOUSTON favored by 3 over Tennessee ....................................... ( 20-34)
('04) CINCINNATI favored by 5½ over New York Giants ........................ ( 23-22)
('07) WASHINGTON favored by 8½ over Arizona ................................... ( 21-19)
('05) Washington favored by 4 over ARIZONA ......................................... ( 17-13)
('02) WASHINGTON favored by 6½ over Arizona .................................... ( 31-23)
('07) NEW ENGLAND favored by 22 over Miami .................................... ( 28- 7)
('07) New England favored by 16 over MIAMI ......................................... ( 49-28)
('06) New England favored by 3½ over MIAMI ......................................... ( 0-21)
('06) NEW ENGLAND favored by 10 over Miami ..................................... ( 20-10)
('05) NEW ENGLAND favored by 5½ over Miami ................................... ( 26-28)
('05) New England favored by 3 over MIAMI ........................................... ( 23-16)
('06) CHICAGO favored by 13½ over Tampa Bay (OT) .......................... ( 34-31)
('05) TAMPA BAY favored by 3 over Chicago ......................................... ( 10-13)
('04) TAMPA BAY favored by 7 over Chicago ........................................... ( 19- 7)
('06) MINNESOTA favored by 1½ over Carolina (OT) .............................. ( 16-13)
('05) CAROLINA favored by 7½ over Minnesota ..................................... ( 38-13)
('07) SEATTLE favored by 8½ over St Louis Rams ................................. ( 33- 7)
('07) Seattle favored by 3 over ST LOUIS RAMS .................................... ( 24-19)
('06) SEATTLE favored by 3½ over St Louis Rams ................................ ( 24-22)
('06) Seattle favored by 3 over ST LOUIS RAMS..................................... ( 30-28)
('05) ST LOUIS RAMS favored by 3 over Seattle .................................... ( 31-37)
('05) SEATTLE favored by 7 over St Louis Rams .................................... ( 31-16)
('06) DETROIT favored by 6 over San Francisco ................................... ( 13-19)
('03) SAN FRANCISCO favored by 7 over Detroit ................................... ( 24-17)
('04) Denver favored by 4½ over NEW ORLEANS ................................. ( 34-13)
('00) NEW ORLEANS favored by 1 over Denver .................................... ( 23-38)
('04) PITTSBURGH even with Philadelphia ............................................. ( 27- 3)
('00) PITTSBURGH favored by 3½ over Philadelphia (OT) .................... ( 23-26)
('07) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 6½ over Jacksonville .......................... ( 28-25)
('07) Indianapolis favored by 3 over JACKSONVILLE ............................ ( 29- 7)
('06) Indianapolis favored by 1 over JACKSONVILLE ............................. ( 17-44)
('06) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 7 over Jacksonville ............................... ( 21-14)
('05) INDIANAPOLIS favored by 9 over Jacksonville ............................. ( 10- 3)
('05) Indianapolis favored by 8 over JACKSONVILLE .............................. ( 26-18)
('07) Cleveland favored by 3 over BALTIMORE (OT) ............................... ( 33-30)
('07) Baltimore favored by 4 over CLEVELAND ....................................... ( 13-37)
('06) Baltimore favored by 6½ over CLEVELAND .................................... ( 15-14)
('06) BALTIMORE favored by 11½ over Cleveland ................................. ( 27-17)
('05) Baltimore favored by 3 over CLEVELAND ....................................... ( 16-20)
('05) BALTIMORE favored by 6 over Cleveland ....................................... ( 16- 3)
('07) DALLAS favored by 7 over Green Bay ............................................ ( 37-29)
('04) GREEN BAY favored by 3½ over Dallas .......................................... ( 41-20)
('05) San Diego favored by 6½ over NEW YORK JETS .......................... ( 26-21)
('04) SAN DIEGO favored by 7 over New York Jets (Playoff) (OT) ......... (17-20)
Your Human
Ace I use to have a lot of weeks like you had your first week. But I followed you and made some money last year. Use to be known as Mag antos. Just change my name to fit me better. But ace you the bomb brah. If I was not a percentage better I would be out of the house. But I play small just to yell at the TV and brag between brothers:nohead:. I miss your plays. High end, medium and low. No worry if you would win all the time you would not gambling. Take care brah aloha
Ace I use to have a lot of weeks like you had your first week. But I followed you and made some money last year. Use to be known as Mag antos. Just change my name to fit me better. But ace you the bomb brah. If I was not a percentage better I would be out of the house. But I play small just to yell at the TV and brag between brothers:nohead:. I miss your plays. High end, medium and low. No worry if you would win all the time you would not gambling. Take care brah aloha
$2500.00 -115 #400 Take Washington (-3) over Arizona (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
Last year the Redskins built a 21-6 lead against the Cardinals before holding off a late rally to win by just two points. They were better than Arizona last year and they are better than them right now. Washington has already played the defending Super Bowl champions and a very tricky New Orleans team to get to 1-1, while the Cardinals have inflated value due to their 2-0 mark. However, their two wins came against the lowly Dolphins and 49ers. Arizona has to travel two time zones east and catch an early kickoff, which I think could doom them to another slow start. The ‘Skins have won seven of nine in this series. Kurt Warner has been efficient and has put up strong numbers, but this will be by far the best defense and the best secondary that he has seen this year. Washington is 20-8-1 ATS against a team with a winning record and Jim Zorn’s familiarity with scheming the Cardinals personnel will pay off for the Redskins.
$600.00 -102 #403 Take Tampa Bay (+3) over Chicago (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
The Bears erratic quarterback play will again sink them and I expect at least two turnovers out of Kyle Orton this weekend. The Bears are just 4-9 ATS in their last 13 home games and I think they will suffer a bit of a letdown after their crushing loss at Carolina last week. Former Bear Brian Griese is used to going up against this Chicago defense – he did it every day for two years in practice – and I think he’ll exploit that unit.
$2500.00 -107 ‘Under’ 44 St. Louis at Seattle (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
St. Louis is just 2-7 against the total in its last nine road games and they simply cannot get out of their own way on offense. Seattle is, literally, bringing in wide receivers off the street to suit up for them and Matt Hasselbeck can only do so much by himself. I actually think that both defenses are better than the numbers indicate and that their inflated Points Against numbers are the result of some garbage time scores and defensive or special teams touchdowns. Both offenses, though, are as bad as they’ve looked and they’ve combined to average just 28 points per game. One of my systems suggests that we have an advantage of 25 points on this line!
$400.00 -107 ‘Under’ 42 Jacksonville at Indianapolis (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
Both offensive lines are undergoing severe attrition and both defensive lines should have a field day. Neither offense has moved the ball efficiently in its first two games, with the Jags averaging just 13.0 points and Indy just 15.5. Both defenses have been sound though, as they two units have combined to give up just 40.5 points per game to start the year. I think that the Jaguars are going to rededicate themselves to the running game in this one, and that usually doesn't lead to an eruption of points. Both teams are feeling the pinch of slow starts and we expect both coaches to be extra conservative in this key divisional game.
$600.00 -102 #394 Take Buffalo (-9.5) over Oakland (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
This one is simply a case of playing the better side on two teams headed in opposite directions. The Raiders have injury issues on offense and plenty of off-field distractions, ranging from their head coach’s shaky job status to off-field arrests. Buffalo is a sparkling 11-3 ATS in its last 14 home games and 10-4-1 ATS in its last 15 games overall. We’ll ride the hot team from Upstate New York.
$600.00 -109 NewYork Jets (+9.5) over San Diego (8:30 p.m. Monday, Sept. 22)
This is simply too many points for a primetime matchup between two relatively even matched teams. The Jets are 8-2 ATS as a Monday Night Football underdog and I think they will be able to move the ball against a suddenly porous Chargers defense. San Diego has lost two heart breakers and now everyone expects an "angry" team to coe back and get a win. Well, the Jets are not a pushover and it's not as if the Chargers can just "turn it on" and earn a blowout. The bottom line is that they lost two games to two non-playoff teams from last year and they have shown us very little offensively (especially if LT is not 100 percent) that suggests they will run away with this one. The Jets have covered four straight in this series and I think that the Favre Magic will give us the cash on MNF.
How can I lose...ITS MY BIRTHDAY ON SUNDAY...BUT i WILL NOT BE AROUND SATURDAY...MY GIRLFREIND TOSSING ME A PARTY...SHE WANTED IT ON SUNDAY:shocked: WE ALL KNOW I CANT DO THAT:nono5:
BEST TO ALL THIS WEEK
ACE-ACE
Last year the Redskins built a 21-6 lead against the Cardinals before holding off a late rally to win by just two points. They were better than Arizona last year and they are better than them right now. Washington has already played the defending Super Bowl champions and a very tricky New Orleans team to get to 1-1, while the Cardinals have inflated value due to their 2-0 mark. However, their two wins came against the lowly Dolphins and 49ers. Arizona has to travel two time zones east and catch an early kickoff, which I think could doom them to another slow start. The ‘Skins have won seven of nine in this series. Kurt Warner has been efficient and has put up strong numbers, but this will be by far the best defense and the best secondary that he has seen this year. Washington is 20-8-1 ATS against a team with a winning record and Jim Zorn’s familiarity with scheming the Cardinals personnel will pay off for the Redskins.
$600.00 -102 #403 Take Tampa Bay (+3) over Chicago (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
The Bears erratic quarterback play will again sink them and I expect at least two turnovers out of Kyle Orton this weekend. The Bears are just 4-9 ATS in their last 13 home games and I think they will suffer a bit of a letdown after their crushing loss at Carolina last week. Former Bear Brian Griese is used to going up against this Chicago defense – he did it every day for two years in practice – and I think he’ll exploit that unit.
$2500.00 -107 ‘Under’ 44 St. Louis at Seattle (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
St. Louis is just 2-7 against the total in its last nine road games and they simply cannot get out of their own way on offense. Seattle is, literally, bringing in wide receivers off the street to suit up for them and Matt Hasselbeck can only do so much by himself. I actually think that both defenses are better than the numbers indicate and that their inflated Points Against numbers are the result of some garbage time scores and defensive or special teams touchdowns. Both offenses, though, are as bad as they’ve looked and they’ve combined to average just 28 points per game. One of my systems suggests that we have an advantage of 25 points on this line!
$400.00 -107 ‘Under’ 42 Jacksonville at Indianapolis (4 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
Both offensive lines are undergoing severe attrition and both defensive lines should have a field day. Neither offense has moved the ball efficiently in its first two games, with the Jags averaging just 13.0 points and Indy just 15.5. Both defenses have been sound though, as they two units have combined to give up just 40.5 points per game to start the year. I think that the Jaguars are going to rededicate themselves to the running game in this one, and that usually doesn't lead to an eruption of points. Both teams are feeling the pinch of slow starts and we expect both coaches to be extra conservative in this key divisional game.
$600.00 -102 #394 Take Buffalo (-9.5) over Oakland (1 p.m., Sunday, Sept. 21)
This one is simply a case of playing the better side on two teams headed in opposite directions. The Raiders have injury issues on offense and plenty of off-field distractions, ranging from their head coach’s shaky job status to off-field arrests. Buffalo is a sparkling 11-3 ATS in its last 14 home games and 10-4-1 ATS in its last 15 games overall. We’ll ride the hot team from Upstate New York.
$600.00 -109 NewYork Jets (+9.5) over San Diego (8:30 p.m. Monday, Sept. 22)
This is simply too many points for a primetime matchup between two relatively even matched teams. The Jets are 8-2 ATS as a Monday Night Football underdog and I think they will be able to move the ball against a suddenly porous Chargers defense. San Diego has lost two heart breakers and now everyone expects an "angry" team to coe back and get a win. Well, the Jets are not a pushover and it's not as if the Chargers can just "turn it on" and earn a blowout. The bottom line is that they lost two games to two non-playoff teams from last year and they have shown us very little offensively (especially if LT is not 100 percent) that suggests they will run away with this one. The Jets have covered four straight in this series and I think that the Favre Magic will give us the cash on MNF.
How can I lose...ITS MY BIRTHDAY ON SUNDAY...BUT i WILL NOT BE AROUND SATURDAY...MY GIRLFREIND TOSSING ME A PARTY...SHE WANTED IT ON SUNDAY:shocked: WE ALL KNOW I CANT DO THAT:nono5:
BEST TO ALL THIS WEEK
ACE-ACE
I love the under on the RAMS/SEAHAWKS
...$$$ in the bank baby!!!
Although I dont diagree with you washington -3 pick .......it seems that your write up on this game contradicts the write up on the seahawks game . You say that you think the seahawks defense is decent in so many words and better than the numbers appear. hmmmm ...well then you said that Arizona got its lonely wins from from below par teams in san fran and miami. ................well ...............San fran had thier way with the seahawks last sunday and looked pretty dam good especially if you say the seahawks defense is better than numbers say.
just giving you something to think about baby. I prefer the under on the skins game. but definitely with ya on the under Seahawks game !!!!
muchos dinero this week !!!! and happy HAPPY HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QOH's
...$$$ in the bank baby!!!Although I dont diagree with you washington -3 pick .......it seems that your write up on this game contradicts the write up on the seahawks game . You say that you think the seahawks defense is decent in so many words and better than the numbers appear. hmmmm ...well then you said that Arizona got its lonely wins from from below par teams in san fran and miami. ................well ...............San fran had thier way with the seahawks last sunday and looked pretty dam good especially if you say the seahawks defense is better than numbers say.
just giving you something to think about baby. I prefer the under on the skins game. but definitely with ya on the under Seahawks game !!!!
muchos dinero this week !!!! and happy HAPPY HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QOH's
I love the under on the RAMS/SEAHAWKS
Although I dont diagree with you washington -3 pick .......it seems that your write up on this game contradicts the write up on the seahawks game . You say that you think the seahawks defense is decent in so many words and better than the numbers appear. hmmmm ...well then you said that Arizona got its lonely wins from from below par teams in san fran and miami. ................well ...............San fran had thier way with the seahawks last sunday and looked pretty dam good especially if you say the seahawks defense is better than numbers say.
just giving you something to think about baby. I prefer the under on the skins game. but definitely with ya on the under Seahawks game !!!!
muchos dinero this week !!!! and happy HAPPY HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QOH's
Thank QQH...I tell my writer why I like the game on wed/day than he puts it into his words...sometimes he dont make all the points I would like him too!!
