Follow up of a topic within a topic, I don't know if anyone even noticed this post earlier in this thread:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Without starting another thread, I want to post an interesting line for Friday night's Seattle/San Diego game from Olympic.
First Half:
275 Seahawks -1.5 -125 -150
276 Chargers +1.5 +105 +130
As much as I dislike laying the quarter I feel there is substantial value here playing the Seahawks -1.5 -125 in the first half. Mike Holmgren says he will play his starters (including Matt Hasselback) for the entire 1st half. I have to believe the Seahawks will be very competitive against San Diego with their starters in during the 1st half.
BOL. wil. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Now the line is (Olympic):
275 Seahawks -3 -125
276 Chargers +3 +105
Question is do I take the Chargers plus 3 plus 105 or let my original play ride?
FWIW - I am going to stay on my Seahawk bet, not going to go for middle or side, mainly because I never intended to look for a middle when I made the oringinal 1 unit play.
wil.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Without starting another thread, I want to post an interesting line for Friday night's Seattle/San Diego game from Olympic.
First Half:
275 Seahawks -1.5 -125 -150
276 Chargers +1.5 +105 +130
As much as I dislike laying the quarter I feel there is substantial value here playing the Seahawks -1.5 -125 in the first half. Mike Holmgren says he will play his starters (including Matt Hasselback) for the entire 1st half. I have to believe the Seahawks will be very competitive against San Diego with their starters in during the 1st half.
BOL. wil. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Now the line is (Olympic):
275 Seahawks -3 -125
276 Chargers +3 +105
Question is do I take the Chargers plus 3 plus 105 or let my original play ride?
FWIW - I am going to stay on my Seahawk bet, not going to go for middle or side, mainly because I never intended to look for a middle when I made the oringinal 1 unit play.
wil.
