Dumbass Self-Exposed Liar, aka Bush might be a Penis II

JackDee · Jun 14, 2003

I am absolutely convinced with time we'll find out that they did have a weapons program.
-- Wait a second... I thought we went to war because we already knew for certain that Iraq had thousands of tons of stockpiled chemical weapons, and an active, ongoing weapons program operated in violation of UN sanctions. Now it sounds like Dubya was acting on a hunch, Washington, D.C., Jun. 9, 2003

GringoinCR · Jun 15, 2003

What he meant to say is, "we are currently smuggling the stock pile of weapons into Iraq. Once we are good and ready we will release this information to the press and be vindicated."

JackDee · Jun 15, 2003

amen.

lander · Jun 15, 2003

Jack,
Let's say you were president of America ... and you're Daddy just gave you a new super-scooter Segway.

Would you -
A. Spend every waking second "finding" the weapons that were the "premise" of your direct command to kill tens of thousands of lives?
B. Play with your Daddy & your new toy.

JackDee · Jun 15, 2003

lmao!

btw, the old cia fart bush senior, is still at least 10 times more clever than the dumb sibling, well, clever in a weasel, dishonest kinda way.

Jointpleasure · Jun 15, 2003

It takes time my friends to "test" the weapons for the potential for mass destruction. It may take a year to prove it - be patient. Bush is playing it smart - wait till you have all the evidence then when you're a hundred percent sure of the existence of WMD - wait until the "right time" politically to spring it on the demis!!! Just what a good compassionate conservative man should do.

lander · Jun 15, 2003

"wait till you have all the evidence then when you're a hundred percent sure of the existence of WMD"

When MURDERING tens of thousands of people, it might, just possibly, have been wise to, I dunno, have actually done this before the war

JackDee · Jun 15, 2003

didn't the dumb fvck actually admit via another slip of the tongue, that all the weapons of mass destruction pretexts, were just that, pretexts. Here's the quote, and in my mind it leaves no doubt:

"[Saddam Hussein] is adept at deception and delays and denying. He asked for more time so he can give the so-called inspectors more runaround."
-- And why exactly are they "so-called" inspectors? St. Louis, Missouri, Jan. 22, 2003

MOXIE · Jun 15, 2003

You all are some sick fvcks that should be stripped naked, lined up beside a ditch, and shot.

Brazil4Worldcup2002 · Jun 16, 2003

na, we just dont think like most americans. the world isnt black and white...good vs evil, capitalist vs communist, free country vs rogue state.

GringoinCR · Jun 16, 2003

Moxie, you just keep believing all that shit they keep hand feeding you.

It amazes me how many people just believe what is broadcast.

JackDee · Jun 16, 2003

"stripped naked, lined up beside a ditch, and shot."

you are one democratic bastard moxie, in no way does your statement indicate you are actually the sick fvck that you accuse others of being.

Jointpleasure · Jun 17, 2003

when you're at war, you kill. Not MURDER. Big difference.

Thou shall not kill is properly translated
Thou shall not murder.

You can kill a duck my liberal friends. Can you murder one?

Jointpleasure · Jun 17, 2003

Your problem lander is that you don't think the war was justified therefore you throw out the venom that you libs are so famous for, using words such as murder so as to confuse the uneducated ( usually the demis ) into a frenzy and get the grass root dumbies all fired up so that they'll vote for the likes of Al Sharpton or Al Gore. The tide is turning in the recent years - Walter Cronkite was the most believable democrat ever and even now he has been exposed. Rush Limbaugh is more mainstream than ever now.

lander · Jun 17, 2003

I'm not liberal, just anti-genocidal. Your false <categorization> of my political stances do NOT take away from the FACT that this war in not only UNJUST it is a manufactured lie.

If Bill Clinton pulled this crap I'd want him removed to.

It's not about bi-partisinism it's about humanity - and our president has NONE.

Jointpleasure · Jun 17, 2003

What criteria determines the status weapons of mass destruction?

It wasn't a nuclear bomb that took down the pentagon, the world trade center buildings and don't ever forget about the plane that went down in Pennsylvania. It wasn't a critical computer error on the planes that forced them to crash into the earth in such a violent manner. It wasn't even the fricken box cutters that cut the throat of a stewardess and frightened three of the four planes crew members and passengers to not put up a fight in hopes of a negotiation process forecoming that the movies always seem to portray. It was the highjackers who made a planned decision to kill as many Americans as poosible. So it is not neccesarily a matter of what constitues a WMD but whom constritutes a WMD. Saddam fits that bill as he has a proven track record of killing over a million of his arab people. Bush led a war against this animal. Bush was saving lives by taking this inhumane bastard out. I only wish we could have done it without so many Americans losing their lives. I wouldn't have been so "gentle" around Bagdad. Another American lost his life today over there. Some frickin sniper.

So a weapon of mass destruction ( if your looking for a physical object other than a person mental state of being) could actually be a box cutter - could it not? I know we found some of them over there.

Jointpleasure · Jun 17, 2003

"anti-genocidal" Saddam by not stepping down himself as told to do appropriately bY B2 wiped out a few more thousand of his own race. But thats in Saddams portfolio already.

grantt · Jun 17, 2003

The U.S din't give a crap 11 years ago when saddam actually had chemical weapons and was using them. He was more generous with the U.S. back then. Why would the U.S. care so much about them now when they probably don't have them and as we have seen would not even use them if they had them. Americans are stupid.

lander · Jun 17, 2003

"So a weapon of mass destruction ( if your looking for a physical object other than a person mental state of being) could actually be a box cutter - could it not? I know we found some of them over there."

Hope you don't have a medicine cabinet with a "stockage" of razors (if indeed you are of age to shave

) ....

.. if might "warrant" slaughtering your family with a "bunker-buster" .. but hey, you might have hurt someone, so it was a heroic deed to obliterate you and your family, right?

JackDee · Jun 18, 2003

first of all clinton did act the same way as bubya, or worse, in yugoslavia.

secondly, in their admission the pentagon SOLD WEAPONS of mass destruction to Iraq, duging the iran iraq war.