(doug and doug only)

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Since I can't believe he would take the Golden State over at that huge total, my guess is the San Antonio over ... I had that too, BTJ.
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
gsw over 234.5 -110

770/700

BTJ's bet.

I don't think he will mind it being posted now that it won.
 

I GRIN WHEN I WIN
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,623
Tokens
I LOVE IT LARRY GETS BURRIED AND I COLLECT :dancefool BOYS IF YOU WERE SMART KEEP AN EYE ON LARRY THIS WEEK.


NOW I HAVE A FEW BUCKS TO SEND OFFSHORE IF I CHOOSE TO GO THAT ROUTE.

I GRIN :>Grin> WHEN I WIN
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
4,994
Tokens
Please tell us you or 'Larry' have a play for tonight. I need a good fade - thx Doug.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Please tell us you or 'Larry' have a play for tonight. I need a good fade - thx Doug.

Fading BTJ and/or Larry isn't going to make you squat. Are you going to fade a +250 NHL play? He made his play for a Sunday game on Friday. That isn't the sign of someone worth fading.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
4,994
Tokens
Cincy - given the record of the last few months (Doug has been adding it up recently, but it has been even better - for fades- before the new year)

Yes, I'd fade the hockey plays too!
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Cincy - given the record of the last few months (Doug has been adding it up recently, but it has been even better - for fades- before the new year)

Yes, I'd fade the hockey plays too!

Ok. I will track you and ridicule you if you lose. No different from what you're trying to do to BTJ. Post your fades and we'll go from there.

If you opt not to post fades, I will assign you the opposite of Larry's plays.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
4,994
Tokens
Fine, assign me the opposite of Larry's plays, because if I see them in time I will bet them, may miss a few - but he's far from 'sharp', I'll fade whatever Doug lists. Doug has already started keeping track, so that's easy.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
I never said he was sharp.

The thing is that I just get sick of people making fun of someone's pick. I can see how we can make fun of what BTJ says (like emailing someone being gay) but when people ridicule others for not being to post winners, it gets on my nerves.

99% of sports gamblers don't make money betting -110 lines with no bonus and no line shopping. So unless you're from the 1%, you're losing just like everyone else.

And if you are from the 1%, why the hell would you have to fade someone?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
4,994
Tokens
I fade these plays as I believe they have a better chance than losing than most.

And no, I play mainly at Matchbook and 5D, never -110. But on a night when I don't like many plays, as is often - I believe these types of anti-sharp fades are profitable, hell they have been recently. Perhaps it's just variance, but it's been profitable so I will keep on doing it.

If you're offended that I post about fading, fine, I won't post. But please Doug, keep track for the people who insist it can't work.
 

I GRIN WHEN I WIN
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,623
Tokens
take it easy fellas i have no doubt larry will make money in the long run just wait and see.larry fades also he knows who his deadbeat customers are he has told me certain guys never win i wouldnt doubt a lot of his plays are from players who he knows never win.i just hope i am not on larrys list.i did somehow manage to beat him for 700 dollars last week.

larry has some really big players if anybody thinks larry is mickey mouse your wrong larry was mentioned in the newspaper with the real wise guys in boston.this guy is the real deal.

hey cus i would love to have a side bet with you on larry making money he will come back strong this week.

f-ck all this larry talk i have to work on my own gambling plays.
 

I GRIN WHEN I WIN
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,623
Tokens
I AM A LOSER BOYS DETAILS IN THE MORNING :sad3:

I NEVER GRIN :nono5: IF I DONT WIN
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
I AM A LOSER BOYS DETAILS IN THE MORNING :sad3:

I NEVER GRIN :nono5: IF I DONT WIN

Let me guess. You went to smack the Russian but slipped on the ice on his porch. That means he doesn't use rocksalt on his porch and just on the sidewalk.
 

I GRIN WHEN I WIN
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,623
Tokens
BOYS THE WEEK COULDNT HAVE STARTED OUT ANY WORSE I PANICED AND GOT DOUBLE DIPPED.THIS HAPPENS TO ME ALL THE TIME YOU WOULD THINK AFTER SO MANY YEARS IN THE BUSINESS I WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE CONTROL.

I LOST A HEARTBREAKER IN THE NEW JERSEY GAME I HAD THE OVER 202 1/2 THE GAME ENDS ON 202.BOYS I HAD TWO CHANCES TO GET MY DOUGH BACK I COULD HAVE BET A HOCKEY GAME OR I COULD HAVE BET THE INDIANA UTAH 2ND HALF.

BOYS THE SCORE AT THE HALF WAS UTAH 70 INDIANA 63 THATS 133 POINTS THE TOTAL FOR THE 2ND HALF WAS 108.I REALIZED THE GAME HAD TO SLOW DOWN A LITTLE BUT I THOIGHT FOR SURE THEY WOULD GET OVER 108 AND THEY DAM WELL SHOULD HAVE IF THEY DIDNT GO 2.20 WITHOUT SCORING A POINT IN 4TH QUARTER.UTAH COULD HAVE NAMED THE NUMBER IN THIS GAME FELLAS THEY WENT UP BY 20 PULLED THERE STARTERS THEN INDIANA CAME BACK A LITTLE AND THE STARTERS COULDNT GET BACK IN RYTHEM.

BOYS THIS IS WHY ITS HARD TO PLAY SIDES IN THE NBA THE JAZZ SHOULD HAVE COVERED EASILY BUT THEY F-CK WITH THE NUMBERS AND LET INDIANA COVER.

BOYS ITS TUESDAY AND I AM ALREADY BURRIED DOWN 1210 IF I DIDNT LOSE THAT NEW JERSEY GAME I WOULD HAVE WENT TO BED.MAN THESE OVERPAYED JANITORS ARE KILLING ME NOW YOU GUYS KNOW WHY I DONT LIKE NIGERIANS :finger:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
Come on Jim ... the only reason you even got close to 202 was because the game went into OT.
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
Better luck today,Jim.

That credit stuff is dangerous, you get -110. I'd advise sticking to -105 on post-up, you pay losses either way.

BTJ is not a BS-er, he makes these bets.
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
Come on Jim ... the only reason you even got close to 202 was because the game went into OT.

hard to call it the right side, when it stays under with a high-scoring OT.

I would like to see Jim win, and grin ( unless I have to other side), he seems OK, or at least entertaining.

He does play, I'll vouch for that ! I personally don't think BTJ is sharp. I'm unsure of Larry ( they ain't the same guy, no way).
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2000
Messages
8,834
Tokens
hard to call it the right side, when it stays under with a high-scoring OT.

I would like to see Jim win, and grin ( unless I have to other side), he seems OK, or at least entertaining.

He does play, I'll vouch for that ! I personally don't think BTJ is sharp. I'm unsure of Larry ( they ain't the same guy, no way).

How can you play the over when Yi just got hurt and Harris is playing his first game off an injury AND when at 202.5, you're playing a line that has moved 3 points.

Agree that isn't Jim. No play after the G-men lost says it all.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,195
Members
100,877
Latest member
businesstalkmag
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com