does anyone remember the *under* trend?

[ontheoutside]

i thought i saw it on here once a couple years ago,, i think it went something like this [dont quote me] i mite have this wrong
if the 1st half goes over in bowl games you automaticly bet the under in 2nd half,, the % is crazy high for the 2nd half under

 

[HotRocks]

I think it's take the Under in the bowl games 1H up to Dec 31st.

If the Under hits 1st H stop, if it goes Over, take the 2H Under

 

[hoku808pc]

That was it… bet 1H under. If lose, bet 2u on 2H under.

I dont think it did good last couple years tho.

 

[phokingood]

But I think it was good today LOL

 

[hoku808pc]

Both halves went over in USC game.

 

[phokingood]

You’re absolutely correct. I thought I lost 1h. ?

 

[MAGAking1]

You dont just take the 2h under you double the bet.
So for each game you either win 1 unit or lose 3.

I dont know how its working last 2 years but I know it was a "killer diller" system that I didnt take advantage of..lol

 

[ontheoutside]

mag is right you bet 55 on 1st half under if it wins you stop if it loses you bet 110 under 2nd half thanks for answering guys

 

[Bruins4Life]

It was for bowl games. Don't think they have started yet lol.

 

[skins85]

Under/under was profitable but someone also tracked over/over and did better last year. I’ll probably roll with over/over since it’s more entertaining to cheer for and don’t want to get too invested into a single teams “motivation” or whatever in the early meaningless games.

 

[HacheMan]

I remember a few but not this one

Let's monitor!

 

[Knightrofins]

This was for bowl games up until Dec 31

Bet the 1H under. If you win, then you are done for the game
If you lose the 1H, then double up on the 2nd half.

I havent done this in the past few years so no idea if this system is still good

If you are a $100 better, then you will either win $100 (1st half winner), $90 (2nd half winner) or lose $330