i wasn't referring to being a mod statement dumbass.
rick doesn't need me to defend him but if you don't think that your statement wasn't a cheap shot directed at him you must be off the diet and on the saturated fat's again. to hold him accountable for the actions of an employee that was hired under his stewardship is fcuking ridiculas and i thought you were at least smart enough to recogonize that, i was wrong agian.
you cleary stated "rick doesn't look for honesty and integrety in an employee" if that isn't a fcuking cheap i don't know what is. i haven't the time to argue with you, now please move along.
hno:hno:thanks for the spell check, next time i hire one you'll be the first i call.
as i stated earlier the next spell checker i hire i'll be sure and call you, don't know if you are actually employee material as you can't even admit when you take a cheap shot at someone. no need to back away from what you clearly typed. if you don't have the balls to stand behind a statement why make it in the first place? another unemployeed hick that spent his welfare check on an e-machine from wal-mart, you do fit that bill.
