<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
W L Pct114 142 .445 St. Louis115 141 .449 Arizona116 140 .453 Philadelphia117 139 .457 Seattle119 137 .465 Washington120 136 .469 San Francisco122 134 .477 Dallas123 133 .480 Chicago123 133 .480 Minnesota125 131 .488 N.Y. Giants125 131 .488 Detroit126 130 .492 Tennessee126 130 .492 Tampa Bay126 130 .492 Carolina126 130 .492 New Orleans127 129 .496 Green Bay128 128 .500 Atlanta129 127 .504 Houston129 127 .504 Jacksonville129 127 .504 Indianapolis130 126 .508 Pittsburgh134 122 .523 Cincinnati134 122 .523 Denver135 121 .527 Cleveland135 121 .527 Oakland136 120 .531 Baltimore136 120 .531 Buffalo137 119 .535 Kansas City137 119 .535 N.Y. Jets138 118 .539 New England139 117 .543 San Diego140 116 .547 Miami</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
Points22.7 Arizona 22.6 Philadelphia 22.6 St. Louis 22.4 Seattle 22.2 N.Y. Giants22.2 Washington22.2 Houston22.0 Jacksonville22.0 Chicago21.9 Detroit21.7 Tennessee21.6 Minnesota21.5 Indianapolis21.5 Pittsburgh21.5 San Francisco21.5 Tampa Bay21.4 Dallas21.3 Baltimore21.3 Green Bay21.3 Cleveland21.2 Carolina21.1 Cincinnati21.1 San Diego21.0 Oakland20.9 Denver20.9 Atlanta20.9 Buffalo20.8 Miami20.8 New Orleans20.6 New England20.6 Kansas City20.4 N.Y. Jets</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
YPG TDPG FPG 120 .90 17.4 Washington 122 .86 17.4 St. Louis 121 .86 17.3 Arizona 120 .84 17.1 Seattle 121 .82 17.0 Green Bay 121 .82 17.0 Detroit 119 .83 16.9 Houston 115 .89 16.9 Dallas 122 .79 16.9 Minnesota 114 .91 16.9 NY Giants 117 .86 16.8 Tampa Bay 113 .91 16.8 Philadelphia 117 .84 16.8 Chicago 121 .77 16.7 Atlanta 122 .75 16.7 Tennessee 122 .74 16.7 San Francisco 119 .80 16.7 Jacksonville 118 .79 16.6 New Orleans 119 .76 16.5 Carolina 119 .76 16.4 Pittsburgh 114 .80 16.3 Buffalo 116 .75 16.2 Baltimore 116 .77 16.2 Indianapolis 110 .86 16.1 Miami 113 .79 16.0 NY Jets 112 .80 16.0 New England 110 .83 16.0 San Diego 108 .86 16.0 Oakland 115 .74 15.9 Cincinnati 116 .69 15.8 Cleveland 109 .80 15.7 Denver 108 .79 15.5 Kansas City</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
YPG TDPG FPG 231 1.52 32.2 St. Louis 229 1.54 32.1 Arizona 228 1.54 32.1 Philadelphia 231 1.46 31.9 NY Giants 231 1.43 31.7 Denver 226 1.51 31.7 Seattle 230 1.43 31.6 Pittsburgh 227 1.48 31.6 Chicago 224 1.50 31.5 Washington 227 1.46 31.4 Jacksonville 226 1.45 31.3 Cleveland 229 1.41 31.3 Tampa Bay 226 1.45 31.2 Detroit 228 1.40 31.2 Houston 225 1.44 31.1 San Diego 226 1.39 31.0 Indianapolis 224 1.42 30.9 Tennessee 225 1.41 30.9 Dallas 224 1.41 30.9 Cincinnati 222 1.45 30.9 Carolina 226 1.38 30.9 Buffalo 223 1.43 30.9 Baltimore 221 1.46 30.9 San Francisco 221 1.45 30.8 Minnesota 225 1.38 30.8 Green Bay 225 1.38 30.7 Oakland 226 1.34 30.7 Miami 223 1.40 30.7 Kansas City 222 1.41 30.7 Atlanta 218 1.41 30.3 New Orleans 220 1.34 30.0 New England 220 1.28 29.7 NY Jets</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Updated through July 18, 2005.[/font] </pre></P>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]<pre>DIFFICULTY OF SCHEDULE -- 2005 (WINS & LOSSES)
Based on how opponents performed last year, the Rams and Cardinals project to play the easiest schedules this year. The Chargers and Dolphins, meanwhile, project to play the hardest schedules. The complete list:[/font]
</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>Based on how opponents performed last year, the Rams and Cardinals project to play the easiest schedules this year. The Chargers and Dolphins, meanwhile, project to play the hardest schedules. The complete list:[/font]
W L Pct114 142 .445 St. Louis115 141 .449 Arizona116 140 .453 Philadelphia117 139 .457 Seattle119 137 .465 Washington120 136 .469 San Francisco122 134 .477 Dallas123 133 .480 Chicago123 133 .480 Minnesota125 131 .488 N.Y. Giants125 131 .488 Detroit126 130 .492 Tennessee126 130 .492 Tampa Bay126 130 .492 Carolina126 130 .492 New Orleans127 129 .496 Green Bay128 128 .500 Atlanta129 127 .504 Houston129 127 .504 Jacksonville129 127 .504 Indianapolis130 126 .508 Pittsburgh134 122 .523 Cincinnati134 122 .523 Denver135 121 .527 Cleveland135 121 .527 Oakland136 120 .531 Baltimore136 120 .531 Buffalo137 119 .535 Kansas City137 119 .535 N.Y. Jets138 118 .539 New England139 117 .543 San Diego140 116 .547 Miami</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]DIFFICULTY OF SCHEDULE -- 2005 (SCORING)
Based on how opponents performed last year, the Cardinals and Eagles project to face the softest defenses this year (their opponents, on average, allowed almost 23 points per game last season). Kansas City, New England and the Jets, meanwhile, project to face the stingiest defenses. The complete list:[/font]
</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>Based on how opponents performed last year, the Cardinals and Eagles project to face the softest defenses this year (their opponents, on average, allowed almost 23 points per game last season). Kansas City, New England and the Jets, meanwhile, project to face the stingiest defenses. The complete list:[/font]
Points22.7 Arizona 22.6 Philadelphia 22.6 St. Louis 22.4 Seattle 22.2 N.Y. Giants22.2 Washington22.2 Houston22.0 Jacksonville22.0 Chicago21.9 Detroit21.7 Tennessee21.6 Minnesota21.5 Indianapolis21.5 Pittsburgh21.5 San Francisco21.5 Tampa Bay21.4 Dallas21.3 Baltimore21.3 Green Bay21.3 Cleveland21.2 Carolina21.1 Cincinnati21.1 San Diego21.0 Oakland20.9 Denver20.9 Atlanta20.9 Buffalo20.8 Miami20.8 New Orleans20.6 New England20.6 Kansas City20.4 N.Y. Jets</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE (2005 Rushing Production)
Based on how opponents performed in the 2004 season. Washington and St. Louis project to play the easiest schedules (in terms of rushing production). Denver and Kansas City project to play the hardest schedules. Numbers include projected rushing yards per game, projected rushing TDs per game, and fantasy points per game, based on 1 point per 10 rushing yards and 6 points for TDs.[/font]
</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>Based on how opponents performed in the 2004 season. Washington and St. Louis project to play the easiest schedules (in terms of rushing production). Denver and Kansas City project to play the hardest schedules. Numbers include projected rushing yards per game, projected rushing TDs per game, and fantasy points per game, based on 1 point per 10 rushing yards and 6 points for TDs.[/font]
YPG TDPG FPG 120 .90 17.4 Washington 122 .86 17.4 St. Louis 121 .86 17.3 Arizona 120 .84 17.1 Seattle 121 .82 17.0 Green Bay 121 .82 17.0 Detroit 119 .83 16.9 Houston 115 .89 16.9 Dallas 122 .79 16.9 Minnesota 114 .91 16.9 NY Giants 117 .86 16.8 Tampa Bay 113 .91 16.8 Philadelphia 117 .84 16.8 Chicago 121 .77 16.7 Atlanta 122 .75 16.7 Tennessee 122 .74 16.7 San Francisco 119 .80 16.7 Jacksonville 118 .79 16.6 New Orleans 119 .76 16.5 Carolina 119 .76 16.4 Pittsburgh 114 .80 16.3 Buffalo 116 .75 16.2 Baltimore 116 .77 16.2 Indianapolis 110 .86 16.1 Miami 113 .79 16.0 NY Jets 112 .80 16.0 New England 110 .83 16.0 San Diego 108 .86 16.0 Oakland 115 .74 15.9 Cincinnati 116 .69 15.8 Cleveland 109 .80 15.7 Denver 108 .79 15.5 Kansas City</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><CAPTION>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE (2005 Passing Production)
Based on how opponents performed in the 2004 season. Arizona and St. Louis project to play the easiest schedules (in terms of passing production). The Patriots and Jets project to play the hardest schedules. Numbers include projected passing yards per game, projected passing TDs per game, and fantasy points per game, based on 1 point per 10 passing yards and 6 points for TDs.[/font]
</CAPTION><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left>Based on how opponents performed in the 2004 season. Arizona and St. Louis project to play the easiest schedules (in terms of passing production). The Patriots and Jets project to play the hardest schedules. Numbers include projected passing yards per game, projected passing TDs per game, and fantasy points per game, based on 1 point per 10 passing yards and 6 points for TDs.[/font]
YPG TDPG FPG 231 1.52 32.2 St. Louis 229 1.54 32.1 Arizona 228 1.54 32.1 Philadelphia 231 1.46 31.9 NY Giants 231 1.43 31.7 Denver 226 1.51 31.7 Seattle 230 1.43 31.6 Pittsburgh 227 1.48 31.6 Chicago 224 1.50 31.5 Washington 227 1.46 31.4 Jacksonville 226 1.45 31.3 Cleveland 229 1.41 31.3 Tampa Bay 226 1.45 31.2 Detroit 228 1.40 31.2 Houston 225 1.44 31.1 San Diego 226 1.39 31.0 Indianapolis 224 1.42 30.9 Tennessee 225 1.41 30.9 Dallas 224 1.41 30.9 Cincinnati 222 1.45 30.9 Carolina 226 1.38 30.9 Buffalo 223 1.43 30.9 Baltimore 221 1.46 30.9 San Francisco 221 1.45 30.8 Minnesota 225 1.38 30.8 Green Bay 225 1.38 30.7 Oakland 226 1.34 30.7 Miami 223 1.40 30.7 Kansas City 222 1.41 30.7 Atlanta 218 1.41 30.3 New Orleans 220 1.34 30.0 New England 220 1.28 29.7 NY Jets</PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Updated through July 18, 2005.[/font] </pre></P>
