covid was in Wuhan mid-2018 and found in sewage samples in Europe as early as March 2019 ... the powers knew this existed in mid-late 2018 and just simply cooked it into the 2018-19 Flu Season stats before they figured out a way to create a "pandemic". Check out the excess death stats for southeast asia, NZ, and Australia that flu season and then you'll know why it doesn't exist there or in China anymore. Also take a look at the carbon numbers out of China from mid 2018 through 2019 suggesting they were locked down more than a year before the media reported it was just found in a wet market. They didn't need experimental gene therapy to eradicate it either...
Coronavirus traces found in March 2019 sewage sample, Spanish study shows
<article dir="ltr" class="ArticlePage-article-body-1xN5M" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; width: 852px; max-width: 852px;">MADRID (Reuters) - Spanish virologists have found traces of the novel coronavirus in a sample of Barcelona waste water collected in March 2019, nine months before the COVID-19 disease was identified in China, the University of Barcelona said on Friday.The discovery of virus genome presence so early in Spain, if confirmed, would imply the disease may have appeared much earlier than the scientific community thought.
The University of Barcelona team, who had been testing waste water since mid-April this year to identify potential new outbreaks, decided to also run tests on older samples.
They first found the virus was present in Barcelona on Jan. 15, 2020, 41 days before the first case was officially reported there.
Then they ran tests on samples taken between January 2018 and December 2019 and found the presence of the virus genome in one of them, collected on March 12, 2019.
“The levels of SARS-CoV-2 were low but were positive,” research leader Albert Bosch was quoted as saying by the university.
The research has been submitted for a peer review.
Dr Joan Ramon Villalbi of the Spanish Society for Public Health and Sanitary Administration told Reuters it was still early to draw definitive conclusions.
“When it’s just one result, you always want more data, more studies, more samples to confirm it and rule out a laboratory error or a methodological problem,” he said.
There was the potential for a false positive due to the virus’ similarities with other respiratory infections.
“But it’s definitely interesting, it’s suggestive,” Villalbi said.
</article>
hno:
