"Comatose Woman Denied Final Communion"

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
57
Tokens
This case hits close to home for me. I AM a Catholic, and I don't really want to get into the legal controversy of the feeding tube thing end of this, but Terri Shiavo should be allowed her last rites as a Catholic.

According to local press here in the Tampa Bay Area, police forbid a priest to enter her hospital room after her feeding tube was removed from her stomach the other day.
I feel that a religious ritual, ESPECIALLY Catholic Last Rites before dying, should NOT be interfered with by ANYONE including police or government.

Just sounding off here guys... Let me know what y'all think.

Peace & God Bless
Poker Babe
icon_biggrin.gif
 

I am sorry for using the "R" word - and NOTHING EL
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
9,024
Tokens
i support the tube being pulled. i also think this is asinine! let the woman die with "honor" by giving her last rites. after all - pulling the tube is giving her a death sentence. even people on death row (i believe) get last rites. hopefully this wrong can be "righted" before it is too late. knowing how things work in FL - wouldn't count on it.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
I dont support the tube being pulled, her parents asked her if she wanted to quit being fed, and she rose upright on her bed and violently shook her head no, she did want to live, she still smiles and nods to her parents, this is basically murder. I think God should decide when we die not people, God can still communicate to us when we are semi conscious, and this is when we are the most responsive to that, because we dont have outside distractions. Her parents want to be legal guardians, but her ex husband who has remarreid wants her dead so he can party with the life insurance money.


As far as the last rights issue, that is so minor to the murder issue I wont even comment on it.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
I would also being willing to bet that the quality of her life the last 13 yrs was far superior of her life before that. I bet she has never been so close to God, and has never felt the Holy Spirit like she has now as pre coma when she was living with Mike Schiavo who now wants here dead.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
Dear Gov. Bush,

You have before you the most important decision of your political career: Will you or will you not uphold your oath of office to protect the constitutional rights of Terri Schindler-Schiavo?

Additionally, many of our readers have asked questions which, frankly – as reasonable as they are – I don't know how to answer them. Perhaps you do. For example:



Why is it that a governor can commute the death sentence of a person convicted of murder, but cannot stop the execution of an innocent young woman?

By the definitions of "cruel and unusual," our courts would not allow a convicted murderer to die of legally sanctioned starvation and dehydration. Why are you allowing this to be done to an innocent young woman?

If any person in America tried to euthanize their dog the way you are allowing to be done to Terri Schindler-Schiavo, they would be prosecuted for cruelty to an animal. Why are you allowing this to be done to an innocent human being?

Gov. Bush, I must also tell you that your pitiful attempt to make people think you are impotent to act in this matter is not credible. It makes people think you are acting in bad faith – washing your hands of a difficult matter just as Pontius Pilate did with Jesus 2,000 years ago. If such is the case – and I believe it is likely – you sir are a coward without modern-day peer. I hope I'm wrong. But, if you let this woman die, her blood is on your hands.

Oh, and yes, Gov. Bush, I am aware there may be a special session of the state legislature that might include a bill to address this matter. But the simple fact is you already have grounds to take charge now. By the time this "special session" gets done, Terri may very well be dead. But then you'll be able to shrug your shoulders and give yourself and the legislature enough cover to pretend you really tried to help Terri, right?

Surely, governor, there are ample reasons to warrant investigations into the activities of the people involved in seeking Terri's death. And surely there is ample evidence that Terri is no more a vegetable than you are, governor – she laughs, she cries, she moves in response to words and other stimuli. She is awake. She is alive. And she is a citizen of your state who is entitled to the full protection of the law.

Terri Schindler-Schiavo is being denied her right to life. She needs help to be rehabilitated. She does not deserve a painful execution that we wouldn't even subject dogs or criminals to.

So, governor, will you act honorably and uphold the integrity of your oath of office or will you allow an innocent, helpless woman to be murdered by legally mandated neglect?

The world is watching.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
Friends, as you read this story please do my family a favor and not just see the words written on these pages but try to feel them. The goal of this story is for others to see Terri as someone more than a picture in the newspaper or a face on the news. We, as a family, are fighting against her husband in an attempt to prevent the removal of her feeding tube. To my parents, my younger sister, our friends and even to many she never knew, Terri is LIFE and in this process we have to be her voice.

Imagine a laughter that could fill a room and make you feel as though there is nowhere else you would rather be. Imagine a hug so genuine that it could bring you tears. Imagine the gift of a smile that would brighten the gloomiest of days. Imagine being able to entrust your deepest secrets to someone and feeling secure that the secret would be kept forever. Imagine someone who would cry for hours when faced with the knowledge that an animal had been harmed or killed. Imagine someone who would drive thirty minutes out of her way up to five times a week to visit a sick grandmother. Imagine someone who would forgo her wants and wishes for just knowing that doing something different would provide someone else with five minutes of happiness. Imagine a friend who said I love you a thousand times – not with words – but with the portrayal of respect, sincerity, and compassion. Imagine someone who would seek and find the good in even the worst of situation and make others question what it was that they were worried about in the first place. Imagine someone who looked at life as a gift and tried to live everyday to it's fullest. Imagine someone who would except you unconditionally with the grace of love and the lack of judgment. If you can imagine these things, through your imagination you have met Terri Schiavo.

Unfortunately, this is Terri as we once knew her. On February 25, 1990, my sister, a beautiful young woman with a life of challenges and new experiences ahead of her collapsed on her hallway floor and experienced cardiac arrest which deprived oxygen to her brain for up to five minutes. This has caused her to enter the state in which she has remained for the past twelve years. Unbeknownst to my family, this tragedy was only the beginning of years of obstacles and tears. Please bare with me while I try to explain events which have made these past years particularly difficult and has put my family in a position of literally fighting for Terri's life.

In order to understand and have an appreciation for what my parents have gone through you have to allow yourself to fully absorb the facts of the past twelve years.

Though things looked bleak after Terri's accident, Michael Schiavo, Terri's husband and legal guardian, pursued a medical malpractice suit on her behalf, which would provide him with the funds to seek aggressive experimental medical treatment for her. Michael was successful and was awarded $300 thousand in punitive damages and Terri was awarded $750 thousand for experimental treatment and medical care. At that time we became hopeful that Terri would be provided with treatment that could possibly help her. Unfortunately, this hope was short lived. Soon after the malpractice suit (within three weeks), a division between my family and Michael began to emerge. Michael immediately began to retract the verbal agreements he had made with my father pertaining to the care and treatment of Terri and it appeared as though he had begun to take a direction of self-serving practice. Since that time, my family has been fighting an uphill battle against Michael for her life.

What was (and has been) so incredibly upsetting to my family is that the money awarded to Terri in the malpractice suit was awarded specifically for the sole purpose of caring for her and seeking aggressive experimental medical treatment. Unfortunately, this has not occurred. In fact, since the malpractice suit, Michael, as Terri's legal guardian, has sought the exact opposite. In the past ten years Michael has attempted to withhold medical treatment that would have ultimately have led to Terri's demise. Had the nursing home not alerted my parents, who then intervened and obtained a court order to continue medical treatment, Terri would have died from simple infections that were ultimately cured with antibiotic treatment. In addition, Michael has sought no medical treatment for Terri outside of what the nursing home provides, which is simply put, "routine care." To add insult to injury, Michael has completely excluded my family from having input or knowledge pertaining to her medical care. So as it stands, my parents no more rights to her than you, as a reader, have at this very moment.

This all sounds pretty incredible. Well, how about these facts! Terri has no pictures in her hospital room of her family or friends because when these objects have been placed, they have been promptly removed. Clothes that my mother has bought and brought to her, have been taken away to never be seen again. Terri is not allowed to be taken outside without permission from her husband. The two cats that my sister had for five years prior to her accident, Michael had euthanized within a year after her cardiac arrest. Michael has been using my sister's $750 thousand dollar medical fund to finance his legal fees, the same funds that were intended for her medical care and treatment. In the malpractice deposition, in 1992, Michael stated "I believe in the vow's I took with my wife. I want to spend the rest of my live with her and I'm going to do that." So would it surprise you to know, though Michael is still married to my sister, he testified in the January 2000 trial that for the last four years he has been engaged to and living with his fiancée?

Based on these facts, hopefully it is easy to see the heartache and frustrations my family has been faced with, however, in retrospect, none of these obstacles compare to what has recently been placed in front of us. In 1997, Michael petitioned the court to have Terri's feeding tube removed, claiming that when Terri was in her early twenties, she stated that she would not want to be kept alive on artificial life support. Until recently, this has never been mentioned. In attempt to fight his request, we endured a week long trial disclaiming that Terri would have ever made this type request. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful and my family is currently in the process of an appeal.

To say that my family was shocked with the outcome of the trial is an understatement. My sister exhibits what my family believes is clear evidence of emotion. She laughs when my mother visits, she cries, she moans, she smiles, and her eyes tract. Doctors testified that these behaviors were reflexes. I believe it is too coincidental that for over twelve years now, Terri consistently demonstrates these emotional reactions when my mother is present.

When I sit by myself and I think about the things that have occurred, I can't help but wonder what the meaning is in all this. We live in a country where the sane and competent can't choose euthanasia yet we can expend someone who doesn't have a living will and is too incompetent to verbalizes their own wishes. I know my sister! She loved life and I believe she never made the comments Michael claims she made. In my opinion there was too much ambiguity in this case for a court to order her death. She is not on a respirator, she is only on a feeding tube. Otherwise, she is physically in excellent health. I can't help but think about a statement one of the doctors who testified in the trial made. He stated that her condition is irreversible and that there is no hope of her recovery. First, I don't understand how he could say this knowing other individuals in Terri's condition that have made substantial progress. Second, even if it were true, so what! Are people with other irreversible conditions with no hope of recovery to also be exterminated? Of course not, that's just as ludicrous and inhumane as what has been proposed for Terri.

Another question I have is based on Michael's promise to honor his wedding vows. How can he have his wife's and fiancée's best interest at heart at the same time? Where is his primary loyalty? I honestly can't see how he can honor his vows and yet share his life with another women. Don't get me wrong, I don't blame Michael for wanting to move forward with his life. He's young and he deserves the opportunity for happiness with someone else just as we all do, but I don't believe it should be through the death of my sister. In my mind, the logical solution is for him to divorce Terri, give guardianship to my parents, move forward with his life, and allow my parents to seek the medical attention that her trust fund was intended for. Unfortunately, Michael won't do this. With what is left of the $750 thousand dollars that Michael stands to inherit upon Terri's death, it has become extremely clear to me that his motives are all but genuine.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Railbird:
I would also being willing to bet that the quality of her life the last 13 yrs was far superior of her life before that. I bet she has never been so close to God, and has never felt the Holy Spirit like she has now as pre coma when she was living with Mike Schiavo who now wants here dead.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Rail, then won't she be even closer to god after she dies, and thus according to your reasoning result in an increase in the quality of her "life"?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,171
Messages
13,564,873
Members
100,753
Latest member
aw8vietnam
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com