<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by goldenpicks2003:
great pick charles
ton.....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
it was a TERRIBLE pick.
please don't confuse a winning pick with a good pick.
laying $2 on a play is a TERRIBLE pick. you do that over the course of the season and by the halfway point - you won't be betting any more for you won't have any more money.
don't get me wrong - i am happy al won the bet - but it still was a TERRIBLE bet - and NO ONE was on it. ok - i take that bac. NO ONE who knows anything about money management was on it.
as i have said before - i would rather lose a good bet then win a bad bet - because the more bad bets you make - the more likely you are going to lose those bad bets - and have no more money left. this was a TERRIBLE bet.
great pick charles
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
it was a TERRIBLE pick.
please don't confuse a winning pick with a good pick.
laying $2 on a play is a TERRIBLE pick. you do that over the course of the season and by the halfway point - you won't be betting any more for you won't have any more money.
don't get me wrong - i am happy al won the bet - but it still was a TERRIBLE bet - and NO ONE was on it. ok - i take that bac. NO ONE who knows anything about money management was on it.
as i have said before - i would rather lose a good bet then win a bad bet - because the more bad bets you make - the more likely you are going to lose those bad bets - and have no more money left. this was a TERRIBLE bet.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by winkyduck:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by goldenpicks2003:
great pick charles
ton.....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
as i have said before - i would rather lose a good bet then win a bad bet - because the more bad bets you make - the more likely you are going to lose those bad bets - and have no more money left. this was a TERRIBLE bet.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree that there was NO value in the COC ML, but I'd rather win a bad bet than lose a good bet anyday.
There is rarely ever value in a road team's ML in CBB, especially once conference play starts. Congrats on the win, al, but I'd eliminate road team MLs from my slate. Just my opinion.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by goldenpicks2003:
great pick charles
as i have said before - i would rather lose a good bet then win a bad bet - because the more bad bets you make - the more likely you are going to lose those bad bets - and have no more money left. this was a TERRIBLE bet.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree that there was NO value in the COC ML, but I'd rather win a bad bet than lose a good bet anyday.
There is rarely ever value in a road team's ML in CBB, especially once conference play starts. Congrats on the win, al, but I'd eliminate road team MLs from my slate. Just my opinion.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I always take the moneylines, just like with Kentucky about 30 min ago <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
But a -125 or -130 ML is a lot different than -200....its like the people last night who were laying -500 on the Flyers.
Granted, I wish I was on the ML for the Kentucky game.....but I'll take the push
But a -125 or -130 ML is a lot different than -200....its like the people last night who were laying -500 on the Flyers.
Granted, I wish I was on the ML for the Kentucky game.....but I'll take the push
