NBA Finals: Cavs-Warriors, Game 2 adjustments and what to watch
THREE KEY QUESTIONS
1. How does the Kyrie Irving injury affect both teams? The Warriors were adamant about not allowing Irving's absence to a letdown. Andre Iguodala talked about the Warriors' regular season struggles vs. teams which were missing stars. Steve Kerr said if they had such a problem, there was something wrong with the team.
"If we have a letdown in The Finals, there is something fundamentally flawed with us each individually and as a team," Kerr said. "There is no way that can possibly happen, right? I mean, we're lucky to be up 10. We're one inch away from being down 10.
This is a team that got to The Finals beating the No. 1 seed the East without Kyrie for a couple games. The challenge is still enormous. There's still so much for us to cover and deal with. There's not any threat of anything like that."
For the Cavaliers, it's simple. No one guy has to step up. LeBron James will have the ball more, but it's hard for him to do much more offensively. He joked Saturday that he doesn't know how much more aggressive he can be than the 38 shots he hoisted in Game 1. Matthew Dellavedova will start, and hopes to rebound from a rough nine minutes in Game 1 (zero points or shots, three assists, Cavs outscored by 13 with him on the floor).
J.R. Smith and Iman Shumpert have to get going, either on their own or through off-ball movement. Shumpert said Friday the Cavs would have to use some flare action to get weak-side shooters going, but James Jones also said that has to maintain floor balance to keep defenders out of the paint and allow perimeter penetrators (read: James) to attack. It's a tough balancing act for the Cavaliers, who really need a second playmaker to produce points.
2. Can the Cavaliers control the pace again? One "win within the loss" for Cleveland in Game 1 was its ability to control the pace. Cleveland stagnated the Warriors in transition, which allowed their defense to get stops, and then grind out possessions on the other end. The game was much slower than the Warriors have played at per game in the playoffs, and that benefits the Cavs, especially with their rebounding advantage.
If the Warriors speed up the game, they make more shots, which allows their defense to set, which forces perimeter misses, all of which quickens the pace. It's all about one thing feeding into another. Stephen Curry said nerves actually stagnated and threw off the Warriors' pace in Game 1 and he expects them to be more focused in Game 2.
Cleveland's only hope is to drag this thing into the mud. They don't have the weapons for a space-and-pace shootout anymore.
3. Can James do any more? He has to set up teammates more, and knows it. But he was also defensive about his his Game 1 performance, saying how he "got 40" instead of being "given 40." That may be true, but the Warriors helped. They openly talked before Game 1 about being willing to live with James taking contested jumpers as long three things happened:
He wasn't getting to the rim
He wasn't in rhythm
The other Cavaliers didn't get loose
All three happened ... and the Cavs almost won.
That's brought a lot of consternation from folks about whether the Cavs' plan was effective. Here's the reality: Had the Warriors lost Game 1, they would have pointed to rebounding issues, sloppy play, poor shooting and nerves. They would have talked about creating better playmaking opportunities when the defense forced the ball out of Curry's hands and about having better rim protection against Timofey Mozgov. The Warriors weren't happy with how they guarded LeBron because they won. They won in part because they defended James in a way they know is replicable.
How James approaches Game 2 will go a long way in determining if the Cavs have a shot here.
THE HIGHLIGHT: We'll miss Irving's shot-making and his sick handle. But we'll also miss his defense, which was shockingly great against Curry in Game 1, never more so than on this play, recovering from behind for the block.
Get well soon.
The Line: The Irving injury only bumped the line for Game 2 by 1.5 points, landing at Warriors minus-7.5 before jumping to eight points Saturday after Game 1's 6-point line, which the Warriors covered ... in overtime.
It's tempting to ride Cleveland here. After all, they have played well with James on the floor and Irving out. They are 5-2 in the playoffs on the road vs. the spread as well. However, the Irving injury just seems like too much vs. a team with a solid game plan. The Warriors know how to attack the Cavs and it's just not likely that the Splash Brothers struggle for a second straight game. Who's more due to produce, the Splash Brothers or Smith after his improbable playoffs?
The under, however, is tempting at 200.5. The Cavaliers should be able to use their size and smarts to drag the pace down again, and simply may not be able to score enough points to near 100.
THREE KEY QUESTIONS
1. How does the Kyrie Irving injury affect both teams? The Warriors were adamant about not allowing Irving's absence to a letdown. Andre Iguodala talked about the Warriors' regular season struggles vs. teams which were missing stars. Steve Kerr said if they had such a problem, there was something wrong with the team.
"If we have a letdown in The Finals, there is something fundamentally flawed with us each individually and as a team," Kerr said. "There is no way that can possibly happen, right? I mean, we're lucky to be up 10. We're one inch away from being down 10.
This is a team that got to The Finals beating the No. 1 seed the East without Kyrie for a couple games. The challenge is still enormous. There's still so much for us to cover and deal with. There's not any threat of anything like that."
For the Cavaliers, it's simple. No one guy has to step up. LeBron James will have the ball more, but it's hard for him to do much more offensively. He joked Saturday that he doesn't know how much more aggressive he can be than the 38 shots he hoisted in Game 1. Matthew Dellavedova will start, and hopes to rebound from a rough nine minutes in Game 1 (zero points or shots, three assists, Cavs outscored by 13 with him on the floor).
J.R. Smith and Iman Shumpert have to get going, either on their own or through off-ball movement. Shumpert said Friday the Cavs would have to use some flare action to get weak-side shooters going, but James Jones also said that has to maintain floor balance to keep defenders out of the paint and allow perimeter penetrators (read: James) to attack. It's a tough balancing act for the Cavaliers, who really need a second playmaker to produce points.
2. Can the Cavaliers control the pace again? One "win within the loss" for Cleveland in Game 1 was its ability to control the pace. Cleveland stagnated the Warriors in transition, which allowed their defense to get stops, and then grind out possessions on the other end. The game was much slower than the Warriors have played at per game in the playoffs, and that benefits the Cavs, especially with their rebounding advantage.
If the Warriors speed up the game, they make more shots, which allows their defense to set, which forces perimeter misses, all of which quickens the pace. It's all about one thing feeding into another. Stephen Curry said nerves actually stagnated and threw off the Warriors' pace in Game 1 and he expects them to be more focused in Game 2.
Cleveland's only hope is to drag this thing into the mud. They don't have the weapons for a space-and-pace shootout anymore.
3. Can James do any more? He has to set up teammates more, and knows it. But he was also defensive about his his Game 1 performance, saying how he "got 40" instead of being "given 40." That may be true, but the Warriors helped. They openly talked before Game 1 about being willing to live with James taking contested jumpers as long three things happened:
He wasn't getting to the rim
He wasn't in rhythm
The other Cavaliers didn't get loose
All three happened ... and the Cavs almost won.
That's brought a lot of consternation from folks about whether the Cavs' plan was effective. Here's the reality: Had the Warriors lost Game 1, they would have pointed to rebounding issues, sloppy play, poor shooting and nerves. They would have talked about creating better playmaking opportunities when the defense forced the ball out of Curry's hands and about having better rim protection against Timofey Mozgov. The Warriors weren't happy with how they guarded LeBron because they won. They won in part because they defended James in a way they know is replicable.
How James approaches Game 2 will go a long way in determining if the Cavs have a shot here.
THE HIGHLIGHT: We'll miss Irving's shot-making and his sick handle. But we'll also miss his defense, which was shockingly great against Curry in Game 1, never more so than on this play, recovering from behind for the block.
Get well soon.
The Line: The Irving injury only bumped the line for Game 2 by 1.5 points, landing at Warriors minus-7.5 before jumping to eight points Saturday after Game 1's 6-point line, which the Warriors covered ... in overtime.
It's tempting to ride Cleveland here. After all, they have played well with James on the floor and Irving out. They are 5-2 in the playoffs on the road vs. the spread as well. However, the Irving injury just seems like too much vs. a team with a solid game plan. The Warriors know how to attack the Cavs and it's just not likely that the Splash Brothers struggle for a second straight game. Who's more due to produce, the Splash Brothers or Smith after his improbable playoffs?
The under, however, is tempting at 200.5. The Cavaliers should be able to use their size and smarts to drag the pace down again, and simply may not be able to score enough points to near 100.