fratfraud applies his econ college know-how to the failed stimulus:
fratfraud: The stimulus wasn't enough! (But Obama's handling of the recession was still the epitome of perfection!)
Q: How much is enough?
fratfraud: As much as necessary! C'mon man, this isn't something I can work out on my spreadsheet. I listen to the experts! These formulas are infinitely complex, ya know, and...
Q: Infinitely complex?
fratfraud: Yes, infinitely complex! Not something you find on your conservative blogs. hardy-har-har!
Q: Maybe all that 'complexity' is why central planning always fails - not enough information (specifically, the right information) flowing to the top? Garbage in, garbage out?
fratfraud: #%()
Obama's handling of the recession was the epitome of perfection!
Racist!
fratfraud: The stimulus wasn't enough! (But Obama's handling of the recession was still the epitome of perfection!)
Q: How much is enough?
fratfraud: As much as necessary! C'mon man, this isn't something I can work out on my spreadsheet. I listen to the experts! These formulas are infinitely complex, ya know, and...
Q: Infinitely complex?
fratfraud: Yes, infinitely complex! Not something you find on your conservative blogs. hardy-har-har!
Q: Maybe all that 'complexity' is why central planning always fails - not enough information (specifically, the right information) flowing to the top? Garbage in, garbage out?
fratfraud: #%()
Obama's handling of the recession was the epitome of perfection!
Racist!
c'mon man, of course he's a climate change expert
he had a really smart kindergarten teacher that used to tell him when it started raining, and he's been observing climate change ever since
he's a monetary and economic expert because he had a really smart "English Professor" in college
he's a weapons expert because he plays video games
and he has "real world experience" with unprecedented legal matters like the NBA vs Donald Sterling
of course it all adds up to one thing, scum's a flaming liberal who calls himself a moderate. it's a genetic sorta thing
he had a really smart kindergarten teacher that used to tell him when it started raining, and he's been observing climate change ever since
he's a monetary and economic expert because he had a really smart "English Professor" in college
he's a weapons expert because he plays video games
and he has "real world experience" with unprecedented legal matters like the NBA vs Donald Sterling
of course it all adds up to one thing, scum's a flaming liberal who calls himself a moderate. it's a genetic sorta thing
Willie is 100% conjecture. He has the thought process that he is special and has a special understanding of everything as long as he thinks it. Even if he's always wrong. I just point to real professionals that are involved in real monetary systems and climate science. I believe in academia. Willie believes in himself and .com blogs that support his thoughts. That's the difference between conservatives and educated people. We let the facts determine our beliefs, we don't believe something than try to find any logical fallacy that supports it. That's how racist Willie type people work.
"Obama's handling of the recession was the epitome of perfection!"
Obama Speaking the Truth about Global Warming to College Graduates
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=992367
Bro. Please listen. You are wrong. The people that are collecting the data have lied about it...they have cheated and used false computer models to develop their theories, and then given it to other like minded "scientists" to peer review their findings...they most likely knew the numbers were false also. This is on the tail of the group of European scientists that were caught falsifying data 3-4 years ago...and talked about it openly in their emails. Remember the pending World Climate Meeting that was a week or two away from this scandal? Do you not think they were gearing up for the global carbon tax? Al Gore was prepping the world by touting the carbon tax just weeks before this study hit the streets...then the scandal put the kebosh on everything.
Do you even get a sniff of what I am saying? You keep defending shit you know nothing about, saying this is how science is formed. Well, how many fucking times have scientists changed their mind on shit. First chocolate is bad for you, then it is good for you, oh wait, no it's really, really bad for you...oh hold on, this guy over here says it's good for you.
You sit there and act like the shit you are talking about is gospel. It is not. Academia is great, and you can broaden your horizons and learn a lot of shit..but that shit only takes you so far. This is what conservatives talk about "real life experience." I employ two people full time, and 1099 about 6 others on a year to year basis. My yearly sales tops 2.5 million every year, and have hit the 3 million dollar mark twice in the last eight. I am accountable for every single contract I sign, paycheck, inventory, sales, payroll, meetings, expenses, etc. etc. etc.
You live in a bubble where you have to give pre-programmed orders to a bunch of oil field guys. You have no fking clue what we mean by generating wealth, and real world shit. Neither do 90% of the politicians in Washington, nor nearly 100% of people in academia.
It reminds me of the academy awards. A bunch of people who have done nothing, been nothing, and are nothing but a fake character on a movie screen, telling each other how great they are. You can substitute academy awards for academia awards, and these are the exact people you are learning from and then turning around and calling people like Willie stupid. Willie probably has more life experience and knowledge in on year of his business life than you have in your entirety.
Cherry picking data and logical fallacies is all you have. There are tens thousands of scientists across the world that research and gather data on climate change and only a handful of them deny that it's man made. It's not even a debate in the academic community. The only people arguing are people with a political agenda like you.
Lol, is this really your argument Gas Man? That scientists have disagreed before... come on now! You are better than this.
Lmao!! What does "generating wealth" have to do with global warming? You are really dumb.
Every time the dumb fuck gets pinned into a corner he uses the same vacuous talking point: "logical fallacy" face)(*^%
Gasman: garbage in, garbage out. The data is corrupt. "Global Warming" computer models have been proven 97% wrong - FACT.
fratfraud: academia, blah, blah, blah...peer review, blah, blah, blah... .com blogs, blah, blah, blah...I listen to really, REALLY smart experts, blah, blah, blah...I believe in academia, blah, blah, blah...I am very, VERY educated, blah, blah, blah...you are incredibly dumb, blah, blah, blah...
Gasman: garbage in, garbage out. The data is corrupt. "Global Warming" computer models have been proven 97% wrong - FACT.
fratfraud: academia, blah, blah, blah...peer review, blah, blah, blah... .com blogs, blah, blah, blah...I listen to really, REALLY smart experts, blah, blah, blah...I believe in academia, blah, blah, blah...I am very, VERY educated, blah, blah, blah...you are incredibly dumb, blah, blah, blah...
Because you guys use nonstop logical fallacies. And it's not a fact at all that computer models have been proven 97% wrong. You just made that up. That's how embarrassing you guys are, lol. Saying scientists have disagreed on something like chocolate as an argument that global warming isn't real is a logical fallacy... lol. It's as blatant of one as there is.
