Well the only correct capping I did in last week’s early pick was that <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comffice:smarttags" /><st1:City w:st="on">Toronto</st1:City> and <st1lace w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Hamilton</st1:City></st1lace> would in fact play. Pretty much nothing else had any accuracy whatsoever.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o> </o>
This week:
<o> </o>
<st1:City w:st="on">Calgary</st1:City> @ <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City>: Always a big fan of home dogs and never a huge fan of the Stamps on the road. They’ve messed around with their defense and have some injuries and have a tendency for cockiness at the best of times. Canadian public loves <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Calgary</st1lace></st1:City> and frowns on this edition of the Bombers. I think Reid gets 150 here and Winnipeg has a shot at the win. As stated elsewhere I am a (nervous) fan of QB Leflors as well and think he'll be a productive CFL QB. I’ll take <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City> with the 5.5 points.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o> </o>
This week:
<o> </o>
<st1:City w:st="on">Calgary</st1:City> @ <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City>: Always a big fan of home dogs and never a huge fan of the Stamps on the road. They’ve messed around with their defense and have some injuries and have a tendency for cockiness at the best of times. Canadian public loves <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Calgary</st1lace></st1:City> and frowns on this edition of the Bombers. I think Reid gets 150 here and Winnipeg has a shot at the win. As stated elsewhere I am a (nervous) fan of QB Leflors as well and think he'll be a productive CFL QB. I’ll take <st1:City w:st="on"><st1lace w:st="on">Winnipeg</st1lace></st1:City> with the 5.5 points.