Cfb totals week # 1

[ballerhanz]

Damn varkey be getting lit up in this thread

 

[sdf]

Nobody is looking to fight. I'm quite a peaceful man. But when your name gets called out for BULLSHIT....i will defend myself and not back down from anyone.

stop entering his threads. it's that simple.

it takes a bigger man to just walk away. you dont have to be a tough guy about it. you two just need to put each other on ignore. it makes everyone's life here at RX that much better...

 

[coffeetea]

Hi Guys - I am playing a Total for Thursday going against the big move - this game opened up 67 it is down to 62 w.kentucky top receiver danger field played sporadically last week he is probable this week anyway I am playing ov 62

i also played maryland ov but it is up to 68 1/2 I played
at a much better number - i would say wait to see if it comes down but I do not believe it will come down and I do not recommend playing at bad numbers - but if it should come down ov is a play -

i usually make a new a new thread every week - let me know what is better same thread every week or my usual new thread each week -
What do u think sdf or anyone else

GL ALL

 

[CoachPotato]

good luck. i got it @65.5

 

[Betallsports]

Let's keep the thread on Subject...

Varky, stay out of Coffee's thread

 

[sdf]

Hi Guys - I am playing a Total for Thursday going against the big move - this game opened up 67 it is down to 62 w.kentucky top receiver danger field played sporadically last week he is probable this week anyway I am playing ov 62

i also played maryland ov but it is up to 68 1/2 I played
at a much better number - i would say wait to see if it comes down but I do not believe it will come down and I do not recommend playing at bad numbers - but if it should come down ov is a play -

i usually make a new a new thread every week - let me know what is better same thread every week or my usual new thread each week -
What do u think sdf or anyone else

GL ALL

new thread is good. glad I got on that MD over early. I have WKy under 66 too....Guess I'll shoot for the middle here with the over 61.5

good luck!

 

[coffeetea]

Let's keep the thread on Subject...

Varky, stay out of Coffee's thread

Ty Betallsports - but u deleted some of my best writing -

)

 

[coffeetea]

good luck. i got it @65.5

GL to you - I see 70 1/2 now - now all they have to do is play and go over

GL ALL

 

[coffeetea]

new thread is good. glad I got on that MD over early. I have WKy under 66 too....Guess I'll shoot for the middle here with the over 61.5

good luck!

Last week wky played an sec team a bad one but still sec - this week I believe doughty will be able to throw and driskel should have a big day - I hope I am correct ) I see Mary at 70 1/2 did not think it would come down I could go for a big middle but will not - Ihave way the best of it and looks like a dead ov - once again now they have to play game )

GL ALL

 

[cloverleaf]

A 'GOOD' totals man has a better chance of winning in CFB than a side player. Unfortunately, most bettors won't spend the time to learn how to play totals...me included.

I like Western Kentucky over 61 (5Dimes). Opened at 67 and can't believe the big boys were off that much.

GL all with your plays...........

 

[coffeetea]

enjoy your posts and glad that they finally kicked that trash (Varkeyboy) out of your threads.....I agree with SDF with making a new thread each week for your totals. Played WKU tonight at 61.

TY sportsfantatic I Totally agree - It's great that u guys all went over a better number than I did - I thought at 62 it would not go lower - obviously I have a lot of opposition -

GL ALL

 

[coffeetea]

A 'GOOD' totals man has a better chance of winning in CFB than a side player. Unfortunately, most bettors won't spend the time to learn how to play totals...me included.

I like Western Kentucky over 61 (5Dimes). Opened at 67 and can't believe the big boys were off that much.

GL all with your plays...........

I agree - a long time ago to long ) I realized that bm's were afraid of Totals - I realized that at that time they would take $10,000 on a side and maybe up to $2,000 on a Total - this told me they were afraid of Totals - It is not necessarily they were wrong I hope I am right and I hope they were wrong with the low number on Maryland - I will be posting more plays - fortunately I have had an excellent opening week and have a huge cushion and I believe everything I posted here has won - I am looking forward to another successful football season - now I am going to toot my own horn and not about CFB but in pro football I have finished in the money 3 times in the Las Vegas Hilton pro football contest and one of those was second place - I haven't played in the contest the last few years - it's a bitch to get older but the alternative is worse -

GL ALL

 

[aircamp]

I agree - a long time ago to long ) I realized that bm's were afraid of Totals - I realized that at that time they would take $10,000 on a side and maybe up to $2,000 on a Total - this told me they were afraid of Totals - It is not necessarily they were wrong I hope I am right and I hope they were wrong with the low number on Maryland - I will be posting more plays - fortunately I have had an excellent opening week and have a huge cushion and I believe everything I posted here has won - I am looking forward to another successful football season - now I am going to toot my own horn and not about CFB but in pro football I have finished in the money 3 times in the Las Vegas Hilton pro football contest and one of those was second place - I haven't played in the contest the last few years - it's a bitch to get older but the alternative is worse -

GL ALL

hey coffee- thanks for posting your plays and insight- you have intrigued me with your comment above about BM and totals for college FB. i am not a frequent poster but wanted to ask you a question about your strategy. I can see where your head was at with the W. kentucky play going against a heavy public move and playing the over (i think thats what happened at least, ha). However, it seems you did not follow this same suit and are doing the opposite with the maryland play as you are going with the public in the heavy move. so this is where i am confused.. do you follow with public after big moves and sometimes against? if so, what is the factor that leans you one way or the other? if you don't mind explaining your reasoning it would be greatly appreciated!

also, sorry for the somewhat elementary questions here i am not very seasoned as you probably can tell :think2:

 

[coffeetea]

hey coffee- thanks for posting your plays and insight- you have intrigued me with your comment above about BM and totals for college FB. i am not a frequent poster but wanted to ask you a question about your strategy. I can see where your head was at with the W. kentucky play going against a heavy public move and playing the over (i think thats what happened at least, ha). However, it seems you did not follow this same suit and are doing the opposite with the maryland play as you are going with the public in the heavy move. so this is where i am confused.. do you follow with public after big moves and sometimes against? if so, what is the factor that leans you one way or the other? if you don't mind explaining your reasoning it would be greatly appreciated!

also, sorry for the somewhat elementary questions here i am not very seasoned as you probably can tell :think2:[/QUOTE
eve ov

 

[coffeetea]

hey coffee- thanks for posting your plays and insight- you have intrigued me with your comment above about BM and totals for college FB. i am not a frequent poster but wanted to ask you a question about your strategy. I can see where your head was at with the W. kentucky play going against a heavy public move and playing the over (i think thats what happened at least, ha). However, it seems you did not follow this same suit and are doing the opposite with the maryland play as you are going with the public in the heavy move. so this is where i am confused.. do you follow with public after big moves and sometimes against? if so, what is the factor that leans you one way or the other? if you don't mind explaining your reasoning it would be greatly appreciated!

also, sorry for the somewhat elementary questions here i am not very seasoned as you probably can tell :think2:[/QUOTE
eve ov

Shit my iPad is jittery this am and have to write what I wrote again It was deleted - maybe betallsports is controlling my iPad )

 

[FearTheRaven]

gl coffee, always enjoy your insight.

 

[coffeetea]

bet

Shit my iPad is jittery this am and have to write what I wrote again It was deleted - maybe betallsports is controlling my iPad )

ok try one more time - these early moves are NOT the public they are sharps looking for what they perceive as value - I make my own numbers and Follow my numbers - it usually is a good idea to fade the public - I believe the only. way to win is to have a good opinion make your numbers and then play where there is value - an example from last week I believe I played Tenn ov 61 I posted Tenn is now 63 1-2 If it comes back down it is a good bet I believe it went to 70 if it opens 61 and goes to 70 going ov 70 is a bad play no value - some here went ov 69 and won but that is a terrible play even though it went ov and they won I a happy they won but bad play - similar this week to the Maryland game this game opened 63 1/2 it is now 70 to go ov 70 is a bad play even if the game goes ov and they win - when u see someone post they have gone ov 68 1-2 or 69 or whatever this is a bad play even if they win - so know. The openers and if someone goes ov or un a bad number it should tell u they should not be followed - now if one is a recreational gambler and has some extra cash and want to have fun and this is part of there social/entertainment it doesn't matter what number u play at and in that case pick your own games and enjoy BUT anyone u see playing at bad numbers stay away from - they are hazardous to your bankrol - one other thing those that make unrealistic claims also stay away from - I hope I have been helpful - my friends say in my past life I must have been a teacher - )

GL ALL

 

[sdf]

I agree - a long time ago to long ) I realized that bm's were afraid of Totals - I realized that at that time they would take $10,000 on a side and maybe up to $2,000 on a Total - this told me they were afraid of Totals - It is not necessarily they were wrong I hope I am right and I hope they were wrong with the low number on Maryland - I will be posting more plays - fortunately I have had an excellent opening week and have a huge cushion and I believe everything I posted here has won - I am looking forward to another successful football season - now I am going to toot my own horn and not about CFB but in pro football I have finished in the money 3 times in the Las Vegas Hilton pro football contest and one of those was second place - I haven't played in the contest the last few years - it's a bitch to get older but the alternative is worse -

GL ALL

great info. hope to see you post more plays at the numbers you got to see if they are in line with mine. we're already opposite 1 game!

the totals market is much sharper these days and books are less afraid to put totals up early and on all games. still easier to beat than sides IMO but books are starting to catch up

 

[aircamp]

bet

ok try one more time - these early moves are NOT the public they are sharps looking for what they perceive as value - I make my own numbers and Follow my numbers - it usually is a good idea to fade the public - I believe the only. way to win is to have a good opinion make your numbers and then play where there is value - an example from last week I believe I played Tenn ov 61 I posted Tenn is now 63 1-2 If it comes back down it is a good bet I believe it went to 70 if it opens 61 and goes to 70 going ov 70 is a bad play no value - some here went ov 69 and won but that is a terrible play even though it went ov and they won I a happy they won but bad play - similar this week to the Maryland game this game opened 63 1/2 it is now 70 to go ov 70 is a bad play even if the game goes ov and they win - when u see someone post they have gone ov 68 1-2 or 69 or whatever this is a bad play even if they win - so know. The openers and if someone goes ov or un a bad number it should tell u they should not be followed - now if one is a recreational gambler and has some extra cash and want to have fun and this is part of there social/entertainment it doesn't matter what number u play at and in that case pick your own games and enjoy BUT anyone u see playing at bad numbers stay away from - they are hazardous to your bankrol - one other thing those that make unrealistic claims also stay away from - I hope I have been helpful - my friends say in my past life I must have been a teacher - )

GL ALL

Got it Thanks for the clarification GL with the rest of the season! Il be following your plays closely for sure

 

[Tappy]

As soon as I looked at the Tennessee game, my first instinct was over, that is why I played the under... Usually when the public has an obvious bet, it is always safest to go the opposite way more often than not. I think Tennessee straight up is a good bet also.