mental fn disorder. These women should counter sue for attempted sexual assault
https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/07/19/canadas-bizarre-trans-waxing-controversy/
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/the-truth-about-jessica-yaniv-is-beginning-to-emerge/
[FONT="]
In 2018, Jessica (formerly Jonathan) Yaniv filed 16 human rights complaints with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, charging various waxing and esthetic salon workers with transphobic discrimination for declining to provide waxing and other beautification services to her male genitals.
[/FONT][FONT="]Each of these salons or salon workers had specifically indicated they only provided intimate area services to female clients, or had challenged Yaniv on her gender due to her then-male name being used on social media, and male presenting photograph. It is worth noting that Yaniv used male pronouns and her male name on her LinkedIn and various social media as late as [/FONT]November of 2018[FONT="].
[/FONT][FONT="]Of the 16 defendants, many are women of colour with religious and/or cultural backgrounds which would have regulated or otherwise made it strictly uncomfortable to have close interaction with male genitals.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]However, and as discussed by JCCF lawyer John Carpay for The Post Millennial in late 2018, it is both professionally and personally legitimate for any female esthetician to limit their services to female genitalia.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Yaniv’s complaints were effectively asserting that it should be made a legal precedent that female estheticians not be allowed to refuse male-bodied clients. Not on religious grounds. Not on cultural grounds. Not because of their comfort level. Not even because they did not have the professional skills or equipment required to successfully perform the very specific “manzillian” procedure. They simply should not be allowed to refuse contact with a penis, period.
[/FONT]
https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/07/19/canadas-bizarre-trans-waxing-controversy/
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/the-truth-about-jessica-yaniv-is-beginning-to-emerge/
[FONT="]
In 2018, Jessica (formerly Jonathan) Yaniv filed 16 human rights complaints with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, charging various waxing and esthetic salon workers with transphobic discrimination for declining to provide waxing and other beautification services to her male genitals.
[/FONT][FONT="]Each of these salons or salon workers had specifically indicated they only provided intimate area services to female clients, or had challenged Yaniv on her gender due to her then-male name being used on social media, and male presenting photograph. It is worth noting that Yaniv used male pronouns and her male name on her LinkedIn and various social media as late as [/FONT]November of 2018[FONT="].
[/FONT][FONT="]Of the 16 defendants, many are women of colour with religious and/or cultural backgrounds which would have regulated or otherwise made it strictly uncomfortable to have close interaction with male genitals.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]However, and as discussed by JCCF lawyer John Carpay for The Post Millennial in late 2018, it is both professionally and personally legitimate for any female esthetician to limit their services to female genitalia.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Yaniv’s complaints were effectively asserting that it should be made a legal precedent that female estheticians not be allowed to refuse male-bodied clients. Not on religious grounds. Not on cultural grounds. Not because of their comfort level. Not even because they did not have the professional skills or equipment required to successfully perform the very specific “manzillian” procedure. They simply should not be allowed to refuse contact with a penis, period.
