Bush Approval Data Thread (second attempt)

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,497
Tokens
The website I was linking to in the previous thread changed the file on me, and it was too old to edit, so I present you with:

Bush Approval Rating

MyHTML4.gif


The numbers are dropping faster than I expected! We should be back to his post-razor-thin election numbers soon, hopefully hitting all time lows near the election.

That is, unless someone blows up a building or a country, the only two poll spikes he has recieved.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
he's fvcking said it himself, this nitwit has come out of the political closet time and again with his verbal gymanstics, and i quote: (You dont need to have read freudian slip of the tongue subconcious theory to figure out that when one uses a positive word for such a horrific event, it's no accident in his mind. Besides he's even said it was a faboulus year for him.)

"TRIFECTA [ TOP ]
This repeat offense features Dubya comparing the triple tragedies of war, recession and national emergency to winning big (with a "trifecta") at the horse track.

1. Lucky me. I hit the trifecta. (Mid-September 2001)

2. You know, I was campaigning in Chicago and somebody asked me, is there ever any time where the budget might have to go into deficit? I said only if we were at war or had a national emergency or were in recession. Little did I realize we'd get the trifecta. (Feb. 27, 2002)

3. You know, I remember campaigning in Chicago and somebody said, would you ever spend a deficit? And I said, only if we're at war or we had a recession or there was a national emergency. Little did I realize we'd get the trifecta. (Mar. 1, 2002)

4. I was campaigning in Chicago one time and a fellow said, would you ever allow for deficit spending, would that ever enter your vocabulary? I said, well, under certain circumstances. Only if we're at war or there was a national emergency or there was a recession. Little did I realize we'd draw the trifecta. (Mar. 27, 2002)

5. I'll never forget one time in Chicago when a reporter said, would you ever deficit spend? And I said, well, only -- only if we were at war, only if there were a national emergency, or only if there is a recession. Never did I believe we'd get the trifecta. (Mar. 27, 2002)

6. You know, when I was campaigning in Chicago, in the general election, somebody said, "Would you ever deficit spend?" I said, "Well, only if we were at war, or there was a national emergency, or we were in a recession." Little did I realize we'd get the trifecta. (Mar. 29, 2002)

7. I remember campaigning in Chicago one time, and the guy said, would you ever deficit spend? I said, well, only if we were at war, or the country was in recession, or there was a national emergency. I didn't realize we were going to get the trifecta. We're dealing with the issue of our economy, and I want you to know that we're dealing with the issue of war and our national emergency, as well. (Apr. 3, 2002)

8. I remember campaigning in Chicago one time, and the guy said, would you ever deficit spend? I said, well, only if we were at war, or the country was in recession, or there was a national emergency. I didn't realize we were going to get the trifecta. (Apr. 4, 2002)

9. The recession -- no question, I remember when I was campaigning, I said, would you ever deficit spend? And I said, yes, only if there were a time of war, or recession, or a national emergency. Never thought we'd get -- And so we have a temporary deficit in our budget, because we are at war, we're recovering, our economy is recovering, and we've had a national emergency. Never did I dream we'd have the trifecta. (Apr. 16, 2002)

10. You know, when I was campaigning in Chicago one time, they said, would you ever have a deficit? I said, I hope not. I said, I think it's important for us to make -- to work hard to have a balanced budget. But I said, yes, I'd have a deficit if I were the President only if we were at war, or in a recession, or in times of emergency. I didn't think I was going to draw the trifecta. (Apr. 29, 2002)

11. I remember in Chicago they said to me, would you ever have deficit spending. I said, only if there was a war, or a national emergency, or a recession. Never did I realize we'd get the trifecta. (May 1, 2002)

12. You know, I remember campaigning in Chicago and somebody said, would you ever spend a deficit? And I said, only if we're at war or we had a recession or there was a national emergency. Little did I realize we'd get the trifecta. (May 1, 2002)

13. Obviously, we've got budget matters. You know, when I was running for President, in Chicago, somebody said, would you ever have deficit spending? I said, only if we were at war, or only if we had a recession, or only if we had a national emergency. Never did I dream we'd get the trifecta. (May 10, 2002)

14. I remember -- I remember campaigning in Chicago, and one of the reporters said, would you ever deficit spend? I said only -- only in times of war, in times of economic insecurity as a result of a recession, or in times of national emergency. Never did I dream we'd have a trifecta. (June 7, 2002)

15. You know, we -- these are extraordinary times. I remember campaigning and somebody said, would you ever deficit spend? I said, only if there was a war, or a recession, or a national emergency. I didn't think we were going to get the trifecta. (June 13, 2002)

16. You know, when I was one time campaigning in Chicago, a reporter said, would you ever have a deficit? And I said, I can't imagine it, but there would be one if we had a war, or a national emergency, or a recession. Never did I dream we'd get the trifecta. (June 14, 2002) "
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JackDee:
he's fvcking said it himself, this nitwit has come out of the political closet time and again with his verbal gymanstics, and i quote: (You dont need to have read freudian slip of the tongue subconcious theory to figure out that when one uses a positive word for such a horrific event, it's no accident in his mind. Besides he's even said it was a faboulus year for him.)"<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Taking quotes out of context is always so much fun.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
You are one slow bloke shotgun, i gather you are not a philosopher or grammarian. All the quotes are "in context", the comparison is there in all of them, that of the horrific tragedy of 9/11 with a very positive occurence, winning big in the fvcking trifecta. So, either dubya is so immensely stupid as to not have any subconscious understanding of the positive tinge a word such as trifecta has, which what with the coke and booze and the genetic handicap has a slight possibility, or, what i think is the case, his words are very telling.

Alright, let me put it even more simply and blundly, your house burns down, your car break down and you md tells you you got a bad case of genital herpes, would you call your friends and in all seriousness and somberness tell them, "Guys i hit the jackpot"?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
Jack, we've seen the quote on TV. It wasn't meant as a positive term given the context of the subject. Keep trying though. I always enjoy seeing such corybantic bitterness at work. One of these days the mud you throw just may stick.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
2,954
Tokens
"Jack, we've seen the quote on TV."
THE quote, he's said it AT LEAST 16 documented times.

"It wasn't meant as a positive term given the context of the subject."
Υou are slower than show. It OBVIOUSLY was not meant to be considered as a positive term, but it TRIFECTA IS A POSITIVE TERM BY ITSELF, GET IT, IT'S AT LEAST ONE OF THE WORST AND MOST TRAGICOMIC BLUNDERS I VE COME ACROSS, TO EVEN MENTION THE WORD TRIFECTA IN THE SAME PARAGRAPH IS GROTESQUE, LET ALONE COMPARE IT TO THE 9/11 TRAGEDY. THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF DEATHS IN WHAT IS ARGUABLY AMERICAS WORST COLLECTIVE MASS GRAVE AND THIS DICK IS ONCE AGAIN DEMONSTRATING AN UTTERLY DISGRACEFUL DISRESPECT FOR THE VICTIMS, TALKING ABOUT HIS SORRY SELF AND THE "TRIFECTA".
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
FSB,
I've thinking about that graph & I hope I'm wrong here, but unless we catch OBL and/or Sadam & the Dems don't get in another BJ scandal I can seriously see an "Iran Conflict" coming next Spring.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
The way the Democrats luck has been runnig lately, GW will catch Saddam next year on Nov. 1st. Not that I don't want to see Saddam get his,because I most certainly do, but why should it effect who will sit in the White House.? I know politics. 9-11 made Rudy and GW much more popular than ever, what I laugh about is when people say what if Al Gore was president and 9-11 happened. Well what if he was, you think we would be teaching Farsi in our public schools right now? Of course he would have dealt with it, how well, we will never know. I have gotten over the Fla. fiasco, I can only say if the Republicans did'nt steal the election it is safe to say if at least fell off a truck. Well enough of this rant, I hope the numbers continue to even out and let the COUNTRY choose in 2004, not the Supreme Court.


wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,497
Tokens
Wil, these numbers should be right about where they were right AFTER the 2000 election right before the 2004 election. It will be equally close (as far as electoral votes go)
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
I agree, except Global politics being so volatile, anything can happen. Domestically GWB is in trouble, no question, but if some sort of patriotic ferver overtakes the Nation from his having to order American troops into harms way again, it will only give him higher approval numbers.- or - We could see a repeat of 1992, when GW sr. went from all time high numbers after the Gulf war to dismal numbers by election time, 2 years later, it just depends on events yet to unfold on the world stage. Right now we are looking at quite a few Global hot spots, lets hope things calm down and we can have an elcetion grounded on issues that effect the quality of life in the United States and not some third world country on the other side of the globe. Don't get wrong I care about foreign policy, but do not want it to decide who wins this election.
Time will tell.


wil.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
My biggest bet ever was GW to win the 2000 election over Gore!!! When I got the bet down he was the dog at +120 I believe. I'll wait until the dems have got their man picked, the media then hypes him ( her ) up and will lay it back down on GW. Winner once - winner twice. Keep bashing Bush and lay your money on the dem so the odds go my way please. Thank you.

That win on Bush was the most exciting win in my short seven year gambling history. I see another one coming only next years will be much less stressful.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
I will say you got your money's worth, almost three months before a "winner" was declared by a 5 to 4 vote by the Supreme Court. Not exactly a rocking chair win. On a more serious note, I am afraid all the waiting and pleading with Democrats will not make GB a dog this time around, he is the incumbent and will be a hefty favorite. BTW. whatever you do do'nt lay more than 1 electoral vote.

wil.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jointpleasure:
My biggest bet ever was GW to win the 2000 election over Gore!!! When I got the bet down he was the dog at +120 I believe. I'll wait until the dems have got their man picked, the media then hypes him ( her ) up and will lay it back down on GW. Winner once - winner twice. Keep bashing Bush and lay your money on the dem so the odds go my way please. Thank you.

That win on Bush was the most exciting win in my short seven year gambling history. I see another one coming only next years will be much less stressful.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Ironically his little Nazi administration will probably make your wagering illegal ... unless of course you like the 40% payback of your state lotto
1036316054.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,153
Messages
13,564,656
Members
100,752
Latest member
gamebet888host
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com