Hello,
I have been betting online sports for about 3 months or so. I started out with $65 at matchbook and am now upto about $200. Here is my system.
I use units of $1. I take a piece of paper and write down the picks of about 10-20 cappers a day. All these cappers are from therx or covers. I also use some of the paid cappers that BookieBuster has been posting. All of the cappers how positive records in the sport I am betting. (baseball right now) I then go through the schedual and circle each team that each capper picked. (if they made a pick on that game)
Say the Cubs and Braves are playing.
If 3 winning cappers picked the Braves and none pick the Cubs, I put 3 units on the Braves.
If 5 cappers pick the Braves, none pick the cubs, I put $5 units on the Braves.
If 5 cappers pick the Braves, and 1 pick the Cubs I would put 3 units on them.
If 3 cappers pick the Braves and 1 pick the cubs I dont bet the game.
If there is only 1 or 2 cappers that bet the game I dont bet the game.
This system has worked so far. These last few weeks have been pretty bad though. However when I look at individual cappers that I follow they have mostly have been winning.
This leads to my question. Should I pick just a few of the best cappers I follow and follow their plays every every day? This would take less time and may be (?) more effective.
However I feel that if many good cappers agree their must be value and a good chance of winning. If many of them dissaggree their must be little value.
Anyone have any thoughts on ways to tweek the system?
Thanks for your help and/or comments!!!
O, and a big thanx to Bookie Buster, SDS, Boxslayer, Tommarrows Newspaper, Choptalk, and all the others I have been following!
Briton
I have been betting online sports for about 3 months or so. I started out with $65 at matchbook and am now upto about $200. Here is my system.
I use units of $1. I take a piece of paper and write down the picks of about 10-20 cappers a day. All these cappers are from therx or covers. I also use some of the paid cappers that BookieBuster has been posting. All of the cappers how positive records in the sport I am betting. (baseball right now) I then go through the schedual and circle each team that each capper picked. (if they made a pick on that game)
Say the Cubs and Braves are playing.
If 3 winning cappers picked the Braves and none pick the Cubs, I put 3 units on the Braves.
If 5 cappers pick the Braves, none pick the cubs, I put $5 units on the Braves.
If 5 cappers pick the Braves, and 1 pick the Cubs I would put 3 units on them.
If 3 cappers pick the Braves and 1 pick the cubs I dont bet the game.
If there is only 1 or 2 cappers that bet the game I dont bet the game.
This system has worked so far. These last few weeks have been pretty bad though. However when I look at individual cappers that I follow they have mostly have been winning.
This leads to my question. Should I pick just a few of the best cappers I follow and follow their plays every every day? This would take less time and may be (?) more effective.
However I feel that if many good cappers agree their must be value and a good chance of winning. If many of them dissaggree their must be little value.
Anyone have any thoughts on ways to tweek the system?
Thanks for your help and/or comments!!!
O, and a big thanx to Bookie Buster, SDS, Boxslayer, Tommarrows Newspaper, Choptalk, and all the others I have been following!
Briton